Kast
Kast wrote:@Greyice-
How about you cut the crap and play the game? Flailing around randomly D1 like an idiot is just going to waste time and peg you for a useless VI. If you're scum, then keep it up, but if you're town, you're just going to hurt your credibility when you try to play seriously later. In either case, you're just setting yourself up as lynch bait (either as a mislynch or a sacrificial bus) and that's clearly not playing to your win con.
This is a serious overreaction to something that was blatantly sarcastic, but I don't see why GreyICE reacted to Kast's questions as he did, which was a spark for the above.
Why not just answer Kast's original questions and be done with it? I kinda see Kast being used as a scapegoat for trying to understand things better.
Amrun
Amrun's
Post 70 feels very odd to me. Then to beg people not to answer the question in
Post 72 just reeks of backpedaling when she says "this could lead us somewhere I don't want to go."
Stevie
StevieT92 wrote:I'm not getting a really scummy read of Kast, but I don't think the wagon is completely unfounded, however I wouldn't like it to see it get out of hand.
Fencesitting at it's finest. No reasons given as to why you find Kast town or why you don't think the wagon is completely unfounded.
Get off the fence, sir.
StevieT92 wrote:If you want to see why I think the cult mention is a scum tell, then read my posts. That cult post has derailed a lot of our day one discussion. Its a scumtell and I'm not the only one who thinks that. If you disagree with that it's fine but to attack me over that is ridiculous.
While I agree with the derailment of discussion statement and the fact that cult mentions (in any other case) are scummy, in this particular case (and as the person who all of this b.s. is about), you are seriously wrong in this matter.
GreyICE
GreyICE wrote:Kast posts suck. This is a good reason to lynch.
You've done nothing but say things like this about Kast. How about a legitimate case rather than saying things like this?
GreyICE wrote:Those questions are stupid. I specifically track/watch on night kills. If someone isn't KILLED at night, why would I watch/track to them?
As for roleblocking all watchers by inserting my name, NO. Why the FUCK wouldn't I mention that if I did THAT?!? I fucking just show up on the list of people. If it's me+1, then +1 is scum. If it's just me, lynch me and you'll have a confirmed Mafia Ninja and/or confirmed scum fakeclaiming.
I'm not really sure where all the negativity is coming from, but if you had just answered in the first place, then things wouldn't have gotten this far.
GreyICE wrote:Drew those questions were still noise designed to look town, they were stupid as SIN.
How so? You could have easily given the above answer well before when you did it, rather than refuse, refuse, refuse.
Refusing to answer or giving people a hard time when they ask a question is quite anti-town to me. Why play to that?
Nocmen
Nocmen wrote:Amrun wrote:Kast's posts seem pretty reasonable to me and I don't see what all the fuss is about.
Nice pun, though.
Why do you think his posts are townlike? He hasn't given much reads, aside from calling Grey a VI. Besides that, I find much of his posts hypocritical and overreacting about discussion on previous games and the claim.
She didn't say anything about his posts being townlike. Just that they are reasonable.
I'm a bit concerned about your assumptions here.
Nocmen wrote:Masons now too? Why the hell would you out that fact for no good reason?
Seriously.
Pomegranate
Pomegranate wrote:GI's posts suck, considering he isn't answering valid questions, and he's criticizing Kast, who is making sense and stuff. GI continuously avoids/brushes off legitimate questions.
I definitely agree. The more I think about it, the more the footing of this Kast wagon is crumbling.
Celebloki
Celebloki wrote:Starbuck seems to still be very sensitive over this and has done nothing but attack others for bringing it up with her posts. Again I don't find this town or scummy, just drama from previous games that doesn't need to be here.
Agreed, but I wasn't attacking anyone about it. My issue is that ever since that game, I cannot play a game where that specific instance is not brought up within a new game. I'm frankly tired of seeing it.
If it was a topic that needed to be brought up, then it should have been brought up in the sign up thread (rather than here) before the game started.
I think Amrun's claims of it being an RVS hello are crap, especially when she said that "I have no personal problem with Starbuck, but that warrants an RVS warning that such things will not be tolerated a second time." That statement alone proved to me that it wasn't just an "RVS hello" as she tried to make it out to be.
I understand the use of meta, but that one game, in no way, defines my meta as a whole.