Succession Mafia II: OVER!

[Katsuki]

HOLY HELL
THOSE DGB/CR INTERACTIONS ARE TERRIBAD.
WE HAVE CULT HERE FOLKS.

VOTE: DGB

[Bunnylover]

Im here and reading.

[Porochaz]

we're lynching one of flameaxe, fritzler, ooba, porochaz, or populartajo.

I forget, why exactly are we limiting a lynch down to a list you, from what I can tell, arbitrarily came up with? Why exactly should I be following your lead here?

Queue post from Hero saying your scummy for thinking that.

Huh? He didn't receive his scummy for thinking that. That would violate causality.

Have you no response to any part of the case against you?

I already answered what was worth answering before you made your case. Your explanation made it clear that you arbitrarily ruled out a lot of people and your only voting for people who are left. I have no interest in trying to argue against randomness and have more interest in lynching someone like DGB who there is a case against in that anything she has done within this game has either been unhelpful or has "fallen through" or Cobbler for the claim and then making fairly terrible posts with the frequency of the common cold.

[Cobblerfone]

@Cobbler: Why even unvote? There is no threat of Ludi being lynched before you get back. Also why the vote on LL?

I was beginning to be lukewarm about Ludi, and LL was because she's gone AWOL.

HOLY HELL
THOSE DGB/CR INTERACTIONS ARE TERRIBAD.
WE HAVE CULT HERE FOLKS.

VOTE: DGB

Holy cow, can you be anymore obvious?

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Katsuki

[Herodotus]

we're lynching one of flameaxe, fritzler, ooba, porochaz, or populartajo.

I forget, why exactly are we limiting a lynch down to a list you, from what I can tell, arbitrarily came up with? Why exactly should I be following your lead here?

Cough cough cough.

We're limiting the lynch to the list I arbitrarily came up with because my guilty result was on one of the people from that list. (The other names were included because they fit a similar profile, and not because they are particularly suspicious.)
You should follow my lead because this is a smalltown game, so my claim is supported by the flavour.

I see that no one else finds any of those five suspicious.

That's why the CR recruited this person.

It also means I didn't stand a chance of drawing people to the lynch we need without claiming; my attempts to do so were the reason for my obsession with getting people to focus on a small group.

[Seraphim]

Holy fuck who is it?

[Cobblerfone]

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Porochaz

?

That is the one, right? If Poro or whoever isn't cult then lynch Hero tomorrow. Unless he admits to gambitting before the lynch. I believe that accounts for all but a few scenarios.

[Porochaz]

I really like my DGB vote. But your making it so SO difficult. This isn't an either or thing. Your voting me without even looking properly. You don't have a case, you don't know whether your supposed to be voting me and you have yet another terrible post to the collection. At least hero tried to make up some reason before voting me.

[ThAdmiral]

I don't believe people are still voting cobbler!

[ThAdmiral]

Wait, hero claimed a guilty on poro?

vote: poro

[bvoigt]

If I say they might stop acting suspicious.

Oh yeah, I almost forgot. My suspect. It's Lady Lambadelta. She was extremely verbose on day one, and now it's almost like she's left the game. Her latest post is just a vote for me with nothing else with no explanation even though she thought I was town on day one.

LLD didn't even post between these two posts. What made you change your mind and decide to announce your suspicions?

HOLY HELL
THOSE DGB/CR INTERACTIONS ARE TERRIBAD.
WE HAVE CULT HERE FOLKS.

VOTE: DGB

What about their interactions? I still don't find DGB scummy at all.

UNVOTE: Cobblerfone
VOTE: Porochaz

[Cobblerfone]

LLD didn't even post between these two posts. What made you change your mind and decide to announce your suspicions?

I'll post who they are tomorrow if they haven't posted til then.

[Porochaz]

He hasn't actually claimed anything on me.

[Cobblerfone]

He's claimed he's got a guilty, and he's voting you. Though I'd still like confirmation from Hero.

[bvoigt]

LLD didn't even post between these two posts. What made you change your mind and decide to announce your suspicions?

I'll post who they are tomorrow if they haven't posted til then.

Oh, I missed that, sorry. Still don't see the point, but whatever.

[populartajo]

Vote Ludi

Not to sound like a parrot, but basically what batt said is my thoughts exactly.

CAN WE PLZ LYNCH THIS SCUMBAG?

[populartajo]

we're lynching one of flameaxe, fritzler, ooba, porochaz, or populartajo.

I forget, why exactly are we limiting a lynch down to a list you, from what I can tell, arbitrarily came up with? Why exactly should I be following your lead here?

Cough cough cough.

We're limiting the lynch to the list I arbitrarily came up with because my guilty result was on one of the people from that list. (The other names were included because they fit a similar profile, and not because they are particularly suspicious.)
You should follow my lead because this is a smalltown game, so my claim is supported by the flavour.

LETS COME UP WITH ALL THE GUNS IN THE TABALE INSTEAD OF DOING STUPID STUFF AND WASTING MY TIME.

[populartajo]

So, so far we have and please correct me if im wrong:

Serpahim wants Yosa to claim his target. Yosa hesitates but then claims that he targetted ooba and that he was roleblocked.

DGB claimed she didnt use her night action.

Ludi claims Seraphim is also highly likely scum at this point and that he has information that pretty much confirms he is lying about what he did last night. Then bakctracks. I THINK WE NED MORE INFORMATION HERE, LUDI CUZ I THINK YOU ARE TOWN AND YOU ARE DIGGING A DEEP GRAVE WITH THIS STUFF.

Hero claims he has a guilty on one of five players, votes porochaz and we are confused as fuck.

[Yosarian2]

We're limiting the lynch to the list I arbitrarily came up with because my guilty result was on one of the people from that list.

Wait...what?

Are you saying that you are a cop with a guilty, but you aren't going to tell us who you got a guilty on?

What the heck is going on in this game? Did everyone get "must talk in overly cryptic terms" as a post restriction or something?

[populartajo]

finally

I agree with Yosarian2.

[Kinetic]

Mmm, paranoia.

I love it when its so nice and thick,

[Fritzler]

We're limiting the lynch to the list I arbitrarily came up with because my guilty result was on one of the people from that list.

Wait...what?

Are you saying that you are a cop with a guilty, but you aren't going to tell us who you got a guilty on?

What the heck is going on in this game? Did everyone get "must talk in overly cryptic terms" as a post restriction or something?

I feel left out without a posting restriction of either being an idiot or being an idiot pretending to be a spy.

I am not moving my vote until he confirms who he got a guilty on.

[Flameaxe]

we're lynching one of flameaxe, fritzler, ooba, porochaz, or populartajo.

I forget, why exactly are we limiting a lynch down to a list you, from what I can tell, arbitrarily came up with? Why exactly should I be following your lead here?

Cough cough cough.

We're limiting the lynch to the list I arbitrarily came up with because my guilty result was on one of the people from that list. (The other names were included because they fit a similar profile, and not because they are particularly suspicious.)
You should follow my lead because this is a smalltown game, so my claim is supported by the flavour.

I see that no one else finds any of those five suspicious.

That's why the CR recruited this person.

It also means I didn't stand a chance of drawing people to the lynch we need without claiming; my attempts to do so were the reason for my obsession with getting people to focus on a small group.

I won't follow the CORRUPT cop in a smalltown game, thanks. (Even then, I doubt you can call this a smalltown game simply because we have professions listed on the first page. I've yet to see any connection between profession and role that can be seen as logical).

Yos' 1693 is 100% spot on as well.

[Lady Lambdadelta]

Do people not pay attention to Cobbler for some reason?

In the last two pages, he's changed his vote a insanely high amount of times, each time with less reasoning that the last.

The Katsuki vote was terribad. I don't even get what his reasoning for it was.

Cobbler needs rope, or a bullet between the eyes tonight.

[Cobblerfone]

Do people not pay attention to Cobbler for some reason?

In the last two pages, he's changed his vote a insanely high amount of times, each time with less reasoning that the last.

The Katsuki vote was terribad. I don't even get what his reasoning for it was.

Cobbler needs rope, or a bullet between the eyes tonight.

Have you played with scum!Katsuki? 'cause she was scum in my most recent completed game. Add in her somewhat changed style from D1 and I'm convinced. Now, where have you been, hmm?