that fag!.
i luv vezok btw
jasonT1981 wrote:
1) Meransiel
2) vezokpiraka
3) MagnaofIllusion
4) PeregrineV
5) Pappums Leather Jacket
6) Zinger2099
7) chkballin
8) marco1610
9) Pvt Slate
10) Nero Cain
11) David Xanatos
12) easjo682
13) jilynne1991
14) Pinky and the Brain
15) ZeL1nK
16) andrew94
17) izakthegoomba
18) Pine
19) Chevre
20) ThAdmiral
21) Vifam
22) Rodion
23) Leonshade
24) ThreeIsFrench
25) killerjester
26) Oversoul
27) silverbullet999
chkballin wrote:Just some quick thoughts :
The recent claim has had a substantial effect on this hydra. The only thing we can agree on is that our Day 1 scumhunting/lynching efforts would be best placed elsewhere, although the severity of the Zinger problem is debatable. Our general thoughts are that the self-aligned jailkeeper claim is most likely true, however his win condition and/or subsequent details of fulfillment or lack thereof may have been slightly altered. Simply put: We think he is who he claims, but we don't trust him to be honest about what happens if he doesn't win since it seems a tad bit boring( but not impossible) that he would remain in the game if his target dies.
~BALLIN
junpei wrote:Junpei wrote:Alright Andrew, lets go through your terrible ISO.
andrew94 wrote:reading through, easjo682 first post is very sus. if you look at it. you will know it is wrong.
also, oversoul is not as clueless as she pretends to be. that dude was obviously joking
Easjo's first post said he was against character claims. Is that what you meant? That's scummy? Explain.
its scummy due to a mixture of gut and the fact that he was sitting on the fence early on. (im pretty sure someone agreed with me after)
andrew94 wrote:chkballing classic scum, posting huge wall of reads. i looked at some of them 'andrew lurking scum'. thats your reason?
early claim is null
magna post 308 town tell
leon post 307 scum tell. no unvote?
Scum = huge wall of reads? Just because you're lazy and refuse to even read walls enough to grasp the understandings of them doesn't mean that only scum use them. But I guess now me and David X are scum in your opinion too right? I noticed you haven't mentioned anything on it, if you think that's classic scum then shouldn't you be voting one of us? How about when Vifam posted his reads? You didn't vote him for that.
no some big walls with fluff< a small 2 sentence. i dont like your strawman argument after that
im pretty sure zingers not telling us the full thing.
i.e. theres 24 people in this game, and normally 1 lynch per day and 2 night kills at night.
this makes ur winning chance like 1%.
bS
Yeah andrew... we said this a while back...
im pretty sure i said that first
andrew94 wrote:i think zinger noted that many of us had said that with his claim, the chances of him winning are close to zero.
therefore, he claimed town JK.
dont think we should lynch him.
unvote vote chkballing
did you see hes last post?
What the fuck does this mean? He noticed that we said his win con was near impossible. So he claimed town JK. So we shouldn't lynch him? That's your reasoning?
i was thinking if he wasnt he wouldnt change back?
andrew94 wrote:1) he basically said what i said before and many others have said. then he sits on the fence
2) cos zinger change claim to town pr
1) You do that too
2) That's another common argument, proves my first point.
andrew94 wrote:you see, at L1 people claim.
if we are not lynching people who claim a pr, then who are we gonna lynch
scum can claim pr as well you know
This post. You say that we should lynch a town PR at some point, yet earlier you said that your reasoning for not voting Zinger was that he claimed a town PRwut? i asked a rheritorical question there, i said if we are not lynching a claimed pr, then WHO will we ever lynch
Junpei wrote:andrew94 wrote:unvote vote silver
respond to stuff when i get back
Also explain the vote when you get back.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Andrew wrote:@everyone you know how you demanded junpei's track. and he said vezok. what if vezok said he did go somewhere. who would you believe.
This is scummy strirring the pot. You’ve asking us to take sides in a theoretical scenario that hasn’t happened. Vezok and Junpei did not contradict each other.
im not 'stirring' the pot. i remember soeone saying 'if vezok says something else, junpei hangs'.
Andrew wrote:ok so moi outed me. cool. after wanting more votes on pappum.
Wanting more votes on another scummy candidate doesn’t mean I shouldn’t do what I think is best for Town. And at this stage I’m doubting very much you are Town. So I wanted to directly post the inforamtion.
fair enough
Andrew wrote:compare that to my posts in the thread
Are you asking me to compare them to the QT thread? I’m not clear on your point here.
in the game thread. my other game threads. all my QT threads. the 'lurk' as you call it, is not lurk. its coming on once a day
Andrew wrote:lol whats wrong with that
So as theortical Town Neighborizer you’d rather skip the ability to take a Town read into the QT to bounce reads off of Day 1 and instead want to hold off? Unless your ability is more restricted than you have indicated I don’t see a Town reason for doing that.
its not more restricted than i said. iwas thinking thinking thinking and thought you. as a theoritcal scum neighborizer, would instead grab a scum buddy or someone that lurks, or a crap guy? i noticed your good play in our vengeful game ages ago. theortically i wouldnt get some strong playes?
Scum on the other hand would have to balance the danger of bringing a Town player into the QT and risk getting fingered for play on two fronts (Thread and QT)
no they dont... how so.
Andrew wrote:because i dont even know what that is.i have scumhunting in the thread. you never intiated any reads on any players privately. all my reads i posted on the game
I didn’t initiate reads as a means of testing you. The other Neighborizer did offer reads up unbidden. You did not.
ok... did he then post those reads in the game thread?
Andrew wrote:i had a feeling i was the less town
So instead of trying to demonstrate through Pro-Town actions you just asked instead?
pro town is not town. if everyone acts pro town, who do you lynch. scum act pro town.
Andrew wrote:same as why i didnt wanna day recruit fast. and bro i asked jason and he said you could invite anyone. i then asked if one was scum, whether he could invite his scumbuddies. he said yea. hello??
Hello whut? You are the Neighborizer. You are the ONLY one who can invite someone to the QT. Why would you even be concerned about being able to invite a scum-buddy unless you are scum?
see my reply above to david
Andrew wrote:read again
I did read. You said, paraphrased “I saw something the other Neighborizer said that was a scum slip and implicated Player Y as scum with them. So I recruited Player Y”. In the same QT post (36 BTW) you said to the effect of “I believe you are scummy for what the other Neighborizor said”.
Why you didn’t just recruit a Town read of yours is beyond me.
i have no main town reads. i considered grabbing a null read, but i wanted to grab that particular guy to see what he said etc
Junpei wrote:Also you don't log on once a day andrew. Or if you do you certainly don't post in the thread once a day. A quick look of your ISO shows this.
ThAdmiral wrote:@ andrew:
1. Why did you recruit someone you had a scumread on, even one not set in stone, if you wanted to keep the integrity of the neighborhood?
You say you were worried, night 1 for example, that the person you recruited might have been scum, and that they could have exploited the knowledge of you and moi as neighbors and that is why you considered not recruiting. Therefore why wouldn't you want to recruit someone you were almost certain was town?
2. When did you start considering MoI as potential scum?
3. Why did you recruit MoI in the first place? (apologies if you've already answered that)