Open 320- Tit for Tat: Game Over!

IH · Post Post #7 (isolation #0) » Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:25 am

vote: darkcoffeejazz

Because the godot theme is now playing in my mind

IH · Post Post #17 (isolation #1) » Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:18 am

No lynch should only be used to get an extra day close to endgame situations or to let power roles 'prove' themselves
I think it's the mod's problem to be honest, and advocating a lynch on an inactive for BEING inactive is scummy
I'll let you know what is "lurky"

on that note

unvote, vote:VisceraEyes

IH · Post Post #22 (isolation #2) » Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:18 pm

No, that was a serious vote. Questions are one thing, but those questions in particular actually all boil down to "How much can I get away with?"

IH · Post Post #40 (isolation #3) » Wed Jul 13, 2011 5:01 am

No, the reason I feel No Lynch is viable in that scenario is because lynching someone based on no scummy behavior gives no information. All it does is diminish town's number by one...and then another at night. If there's no clear candidate, then there's no information to be had from the flip. Sure, there's a 2/9 chance that we'll hit scum...absolutely. But there's a 7/9 chances of hitting a townie that would otherwise be alive to soak up the night-kill that night. And the night-kill gives just as much information if not more than the lynch in that scenario, because then the 1-2 power-roles will have time to do their work. Speaking of power-roles, with no clear lynch candidate there's a 1-2/9 chance of hitting one of THEM as well with a lynch on d1.

I see it more as you're giving the scum a free kill with even less information to look back on (EG, confirming someones role and looking back on their play)