Execution Mafia: Days of the Cold War GAMEOVER

[Codfish]

1. He's completely unopen to discussion. Anti-town.

You're not exactly being open to discussion either, merely making motions against the two people who have said anything against you.

[Codfish]

EBWOP: Anything against what you've said.

[Codfish]

SK, my straight out opinion of vezok was that he's a leaning VI townie until I read the MoI vote and adjoining text.
That's just a weird and obvious contradiction. FoS.

[Codfish]

By adjoining text I mean post 27. While you've already said it in a roundabout way, post 27 is a straight out contradiction of the MoI vote which I don't like, so I'm getting stronger scummy vibes/VI vibes from vezok. As of which between scum/idiot, IMO it's too early to tell.

[Codfish]

@ Quil, I don't see vezok elected the way it's going.

And as for you,

1. You're against any discussion outside of "Go vezok Go!"
2. You're clearly defending a person with scum reads from SK and I.

Open your eyes.

[Codfish]

I didn't attack you, merely question you. I flipped since vezok contradicted which is a much clearer thing to be looking at.

[Codfish]

@ Quil, I don't see vezok elected the way it's going.

And as for you,

1. You're against any discussion outside of "Go vezok Go!"₁
2. You're clearly defending a person with scum reads from SK and I.²

Open your eyes.

¹ Where has there been any other discussion that doesn't regard vesok; how have I been against it?
² How have I been defending vezok? Why are you speaking for SK?

Don't twist my words. I clearly stated that you're against non-pro-vezok discussion. Of course there hasn't been non-vezok discussion.
You've been being pro-vezok ie defending vezok. The facts are laid out for you and you're basically ignoring them.

I'm not speaking for SK, just along similar lines after the inconsistencies from vezok. His conclusion may be the same as mine; that doesn't necessarily mean I'm being his loyal dog or he mine.

My posts are in no way scummy, Quil; you merely seem to be reacting against my push against vezok with a push of your own. What I was going to say was you're trying to garner favour with vezok here, but SK got in while I was posting, so I'd be repeating him.

[Codfish]

I'd actually rather kill Quil right now, on the chance that he's buddying to vezok because he's scum and knows vezok is town.

Why would vezok act like that if he's town? I'm for vezok kill and Quil later.

[Codfish]

Last sentence of post 44, you agree with what you just quoted. But now you disagree.

Conceded. However, you yourself stated that it was "a chance" that Quil is garnering favour. A removal of incompetence is more secure.

@ Quil, This has been done to death. His posts get scratchier as they go along and you still buddy-buddy him.

[Codfish]

I'll ad hom all I want.

I don't really see how explaining how you two are wrong about vezok is buddying him.

You can take a stab at my question since Codfish seems to have brushed it aside in favour of making sweeping statements.

I think I've noticed a pattern emerging in his posting, actually. More on that soon.

To counter you before you start, yes, I'm posting passively active. I'm not nitpicking as of now since I'd prefer to wait for some other people to come on. No need to state the obvious.

On the matter of stating the obvious, I brushed your question aside since it has been done to death and your current defense is basically cyclical ie "Vezok is town" => "I discredit your statements such that I can deflect argument and promote vezok" => "Because vezok is town" and so forth.

Having read 55 while typing, erroneous cyclical reasoning comes out about my posting habits since you've picked a false premise to begin with and gone back to it.

I'll give a full response to you later, as I don't exactly like typing too much on an iPhone.

[Codfish]

@Quil, your false premise is that I flipped _with_ SK and therefore I'm budding him. Your entire argument is based on this.
The fact that I poked him and vezok early on and he responded well whereas vezok did not is all I need and all you should need.

Now that we're on cyclical reasoning, explain to me how "vezok is town" ==> "I'm town and I agree" ==> "You're scum because you don't" ==> ":. Vezok is town" is NOT the most cyclical crap we can see?


Any sort of contradiction you draw out of my recently posts is the result of mischaracterization.

1/2 don't contradict since enough time passed between them; you've disregarded the fact that vezok slipped in between those posts.
The rest are you trying to pull straws. I made a statement and gave the other side of the coin. 3/4 5/6 are the same thing; I made a statement of two options and went for that which is most secure.

[Codfish]

Define opportunistic scum.

[Codfish]

^ Sigh, should start every post with this.

[Codfish]

CC, How can Quil be town if vezok and I are scum?
Quil is the only one playing buddy buddy here; it's to vezok and not to me. You even said yourself that vezok contradicted. So then, what is Quil, the defender of the scum? Not scum?

[Codfish]

V/LA 'til Friday arvo at best, still reading as much as possible.