SleepyKrew wrote:1. He's completely unopen to discussion. Anti-town.
You're not exactly being open to discussion either, merely making motions against the two people who have said anything against you.
Quilford wrote:Codfish wrote:@ Quil, I don't see vezok elected the way it's going.
And as for you,
1. You're against any discussion outside of "Go vezok Go!"1
2. You're clearly defending a person with scum reads from SK and I.2
Open your eyes.
1 Where has there been any other discussion that doesn't regard vesok; how have I been against it?
2 How have I been defending vezok? Why are you speaking for SK?
SleepyKrew wrote:Last sentence of post 44, you agree with what you just quoted. But now you disagree.
Quilford wrote:I'll ad hom all I want.
I don't really see how explaining how you two are wrong about vezok is buddying him.
You can take a stab at my question since Codfish seems to have brushed it aside in favour of making sweeping statements.
I think I've noticed a pattern emerging in his posting, actually. More on that soon.