Give me a night that I was recruited. Humor me.
Addon: I was expecting an answer to this, xvart.
ConSpiracy wrote:Cobbler wrote:Is there a reason they'd have it in a cult-game? ConSpiracy is super-tunneling town.
Okay. What would you have done if you were the second wagon last day with about 3 players that actively suspected you?
Right, fake-claim the most anti-cult power ever.
I don't know if you've heard about WoW-cult mafia, but the GF got as fake-claim acult doc...
Maybe so, but I think you both are independently scummy of each other but after Cobbler proposed his plan your vote sitting on Cobbler is giving me pause about your alignment. Like I said, the relationship will have to be evaluated after the flip. I recall someone (not sure who, maybe you) that has been moderately vocal about Cobbler needing to be lynched since D1 but there has been neither threat of nor push for his lynch.Flameaxe wrote:I like the part where xvart attempts to set up a second lynch.
If you were recruited it would have had to have been N3 or earlier based on what I think you are hiding.Flameaxe wrote:Give me a night that I was recruited. Humor me.
Addon: I was expecting an answer to this, xvart.
ConSpiracy wrote:bvoigt wrote:If I'm not mistaken, we're talking about your argument that the cult recruiters would have an unrecruitable PM for fakeclaiming purposes. Even though LLD confirmed the unrecruitable "flavor word," you were saying that I would have had fakeclaim information available. So no, we weren't talking about the cult doc aspect.
That's why I saidunrecruitabledoc. There hasn't been an recruitable doc in last game (and most likely not in this one either)
xvart wrote:What's scummy is it relies on all those power roles you listed being town already (which is nearly half the town), not to mention directing all of our power roles to doing something else. The classic "look at my left hand while I steal your wallet with my right hand" sort of scam.
Yos wrote:Zdenek: Has been fairly inactive all game. Claimed "pharmacist", with a "50% chance of succeeding at protecting someone". Hasn't clarified what that means, but it doesn't really make any sense either. Why would Flay put in one single role with percentage chance of success into a game like this with no other roles like that? That would be a REALLY odd decision. I think he's probably lying cult as well.
Magister Ludi wrote:Hello, I'd like to hear more opinion on xvart. Am I voting town? Do you agree with me that he is cult? Put some reads out there people,
xvart wrote:Hell, Kinetic could have tried to recruit DGB last night and failed for one reason or another (ABR recruit already?).
bvoigt wrote:
@Yos: So, do xvart and Cobbler both seem like N0 recruits to you?
Also, I would suggest a Bunnylover vig, but that's just my 2 cents.
Battousai wrote:ML- I hit scum, er, someone about to become scum so it sorta counts. Why do you say we need help, when town was only able to lynch one cult (w/o investigation). Do you disagree with anyone being scum?
NS- Why did you kill Andrius?
Bv- I've been trying to kill bunny, but someone always does something that puts them ahead.
Do you know how your vig ability works when you target a location? Also, why didn't you target Yos2 or LLD the following nights after failing to kill them the previous night?Nobody Special, 3204 wrote:I'm a Vig. I can either target a person OR a location; I've been targeting people, as locations aren't guaranteed to have any effect.
If you take a look at most all of my other games I've had a similar posting pattern of what I suppose could be described as moderate lurking (due to excessive work responsibilities and it being my busiest time of year), with the exception of one or two games where I have gotten in pissing matches with other players. I'm also having difficulty honing my "cult hunting" skills.Magister Ludi, 3207 wrote:I think it is likely he was recruited just because he came under such heavy attack, and has sat around and not acted the same because he didn't espect to re-draw any heat. I also think his posting style is more indicative of cult wanting to comment on the game than town wanting to piece it together and break it apart.
bvoigt, 3209 wrote:@xvart: What caused you to say this? It seems odd, since Kinetic was convinced that DGB was an ABR recruit, and I cult doc'ed her N1.
xvart wrote:Hell, Kinetic could have tried to recruit DGB last night and failed for one reason or another (ABR recruit already?).
This is where the logic in me being cult starts to fall apart. It's being said that I am cult because of my play deviating, but I'm not a likely cult recruit N1 because of the suspicion I took D1. You said my play deviated starting D2 when it is highly unlikely I was recruited due to the suspicion I was under the previous day. But if I was recruited night 3 or 4 the reason you think I am cult is not sound since the cult behavior you think I am exhibiting started before you think I could have been recruited.Herodotus wrote:I don't think the day one wagon would prevent xvart from being recruited on night 3 or 4.
xvart wrote:bvoigt, 3209 wrote:@xvart: What caused you to say this? It seems odd, since Kinetic was convinced that DGB was an ABR recruit, and I cult doc'ed her N1.
xvart wrote:Hell, Kinetic could have tried to recruit DGB last night and failed for one reason or another (ABR recruit already?).
You said my point exactly. If Kinetic legitimately believed that DBG was an ABR recruit it could have been because he attempted to recruit DBG and failed, therefor thinking she had already been recruited. And the relevance of you cult doctoring DGB is what since at the time nobody knew you cult doc'ed anyone?
Amrun wrote:Okaaay the fun has arrived.
The fun has not read. Wheeee.
The fun quite frankly has no idea what is going on. Someone give me a quick what-I-need-to-know summary?