The Mafia Dating Game Show 2 - Game over!


User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #18 (isolation #0) » Thu Aug 11, 2011 5:09 am

Post by Maxous »

/confirm
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #80 (isolation #1) » Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:54 am

Post by Maxous »

Amrun is already making me nervous with her buddying.

mountainclimber - 37 wrote: Either:
1. You're scum & you're trying to frame me.
2. You're town & you're really suspicious of people.

And which do you think is more likely? (A "you are either scum or town" is quite captain obvious territory)

VOTE: Mastermind of Sin
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #87 (isolation #2) » Fri Aug 12, 2011 9:35 am

Post by Maxous »

Fourseen.. it's Vifam people were calling opportunistic not TMC.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #121 (isolation #3) » Sat Aug 13, 2011 8:18 am

Post by Maxous »

So Vifam has 7 votes by my count. Such quick wagons flip town more often than not (and his general posting looks town
anyway
)

You know I'm just gonna VOTE: Fourseen circumstance
It looked to me that he was sheeping town votes without paying attention(read:caring) to what he was sheeping.

@Amrun:
Thief is townz.

Tclaw is town. I totally agree.
If I had a third vote it would be on vifam.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #168 (isolation #4) » Sun Aug 14, 2011 1:00 am

Post by Maxous »

Amrun - stating that people are town based on one early post when that person is under no threat of a lynch and there is little reason to state they are town
is
buddying.

I disagree that Vifam is playing any sort of newbie card.
I think FC was above though. I agree with Lowell.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #201 (isolation #5) » Mon Aug 15, 2011 5:48 am

Post by Maxous »

Quilford - what the heck happened to your 'guarantee' here

Amrun - 173 wrote: As stated, I do find fourseen scummy, but why are you avoiding the vifam issue?

?
He looks like a day 1 mislynch TBH.
Don't agree with his reasoning and suspicions but he looks to be actively trying to find scum. Weak reasoning early game does'nt indicate mafia.
It's hard to word this next one - but scum don't usually become the centre of attention like he did early in the game attacking people for the first reasons he could find.(looked more like
actual
scumhunting)

ckd - 187 wrote: why do you think that vifam is not paying a newbie card?

Because I don't see when/where he has tried to justify his actions etc. by claiming he is inexperienced.

Mastermind of Sin - 189 wrote: Maxous needs more votes before we lynch Vifam.

Nope, that's you my white-knighting friend.
4 votes on the wagon. When Amrun asks who the scum is.
I can't be bothered to do a in-depth analysis.

You could of gave any reason or name as to who you thought was scum, but no, you did'nt actually have a reason to think that anyone was scum on the wagon.

Fourseen Circumstance wrote: unvote Lowell. Vote Maxious

I know I'm gonna love the explanation for this.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #204 (isolation #6) » Mon Aug 15, 2011 6:13 am

Post by Maxous »

Yes, you are voting Vifam
now.
But at the time you made the statement you did'nt say Vifam was scum.(in fact the implication I got is that you started thinking he is scum mostly becasue of his reasoning towards amrun)

I also don't get how the wagon was 'obviously opportunistic' rather than 4 townies simply being wrong and/or wanting to add pressure. (not saying they all are though). But this point is moot really.
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #210 (isolation #7) » Mon Aug 15, 2011 9:09 am

Post by Maxous »

Okay MoS, to clarify:
- you saw the wagon on TMC as weak/bad whatever and suspected there was scum pushing it
- at the time of this post you were watching to see which one it was
- you then saw Vifam do something else scummy so you figured it was him.

Is that accurate?
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #255 (isolation #8) » Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:09 pm

Post by Maxous »

Quilford - 251 wrote: In that post I meant to vote ckd,

I'm confused. Was that post a joke or did you actually think both(or one of them) was scum?
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #256 (isolation #9) » Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:13 pm

Post by Maxous »

Actually I'll re-phrase the question:
Were you seriously thinking CKD was scum or were you joking?
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #258 (isolation #10) » Tue Aug 16, 2011 12:03 am

Post by Maxous »

Still don't get this. In post 65 you were meant to vote CKD and you thought he was scum?
CKD had one post -
/confirm
will be gone until monday.


...Is my sarcasm meter broken or am I missing something?
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #284 (isolation #11) » Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:11 am

Post by Maxous »

IS do you actually think Vifam is scum or just voting?
I don't get the Vezok votes either.

As for Thief - if you're gonna be lynching somebody for 'not caring who is lynched', Fourseen Circumstance is a better lynch.
Just look at the ISO. Sheeping the policy lynch on Lowell, voting me for seemingly no reason and voting TMC for 'opportunistic play'. That's rubbish, nothing about his play was opportunistic. When I point this out here, FC does'nt correct me or state why he thought it was opportunitic - he says nothing.

unvote MoS
,
VOTE: Quilford

Why is CKD scum, Quilford?
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated
User avatar
Maxous
Maxous
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Maxous
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3975
Joined: November 11, 2010
Location: Ireland

Post Post #322 (isolation #12) » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:50 am

Post by Maxous »

1
2
3
4

What is missing?

@DX: Vifam is playing different how?
"
And before anyone bitches about me highlighting PoD's 437 when I replaced in and called everyone on my wagon communists, I remind you that communism is not alignment-indicative
" - Belisarius

wiki (actually) updated

Return to “Completed Large Theme Games”