Open 331: No Lynching Town - Game Over!

Fenchurch · Post Post #200 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:58 am

Tenth Vote Count of Day One

hiplop - 3 (Packbat, CSL, izakthegoomba)

Packbat - 2 (glowball, Empking)
CSL - 1 (hiplop)

Not voting: 1 (Ellibereth)

With seven alive, it will take four votes to lynch.

Deadline is: Thursday, 8 September at 8:39 am GMT.

Packbat · Post Post #201 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:03 am

Empking wrote:I ser nothing in hip thst makes me want to vote him over glow

What makes you want to vote glowball over hiplop?

CSL · Post Post #202 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:05 am

You just admitted to skimming his posts.

Packbat wrote:Incidentally, completely separately from any interactions with glowball, there's reason to vote hiplop if you have a townread on CSL:

Packbat wrote:
hiplop wrote:
Packbat wrote:Err, if CSL's town, I'm gunning for
hiplop
, not either of the Es.

Wait, why?

I have townreads on Empking and Ellibereth. Whereas, if CSL is town,
your vote was well-timed to rejuvenate a popular wagon, and one bearing two voters far more flamboyant (and therefore noticeable) than yourself.

Now, ISO hiplop.

Empking · Post Post #203 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:07 am

CSL probably isnt town though.

Pack, Glow isnt a townread.

Packbat · Post Post #204 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:11 am

I

know

, Empking - why are you suspicious of glowball, though? I know why

I

am, but I don't recall your case on that slot.

Packbat · Post Post #205 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:13 am

*checks Empking's ISO*

Is it just the CSL connection?

Empking · Post Post #206 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:16 am

Packbat wrote:*checks Empking's ISO*

Is it just the CSL connection?

Iys your glow-hip conection. If I was to follow then I'd vote for glow rather than hip.

Packbat · Post Post #207 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:22 am

...then why glowball over hiplop?

Empking · Post Post #208 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:24 am

Because hip is a town read.

CSL · Post Post #209 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:26 am

Incompetency is going to be our downfall.

Packbat · Post Post #210 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 6:38 am

Empking wrote:Because hip is a town read.

Let me get this straight. You're saying:

1. glowball is scummy because of glowball's interactions with hiplop, which look like scumbuddy interactions.

2. hiplop is town.

...what?

Empking · Post Post #211 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 7:03 am

Both of them are guilty of that interaction. That doesn't mean that when you look at other factors they'll be equaly scummy.

I'm liking my vote.

izakthegoomba · Post Post #212 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:10 am

Well, I'm not liking your vote.

Pack's #210 highlights a major problem with you.

CSL · Post Post #213 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:12 am

CSL wrote:Incompetency is going to be our downfall.

Guess what, it's happening.

Empking · Post Post #214 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:34 am

CSL wrote:
CSL wrote:Incompetency is going to be our downfall.

Guess what, it's happening.

Yeah I don't think you dodging the lynch is very good either.

glowball · Post Post #215 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:49 am

omg this shouldn't be that hard. VOTE PACKBAT

CSL · Post Post #216 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:59 am

glowball, the more you push off of hiplop and not hammer him, the more a hiplop/you scumteam makes sense.

glowball · Post Post #217 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:01 am

And... I should care why?

izakthegoomba · Post Post #218 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:02 am

glow, if you hammer hiplop, I guarrantee I will vote Packbat tomorrow.

glowball · Post Post #219 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:03 am

or we can lynch PackBat today and get hiplop tomorrow if the circumstances seem fit.

glowball · Post Post #220 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:04 am

or HELL we can get me today so you guys can drop this hiplop scumteam thing and then tomorrow all of you sheep me to victory EVEN if I am dead you will kill PackBat> Izak>CSL

Packbat · Post Post #221 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:11 am

Packbat wrote:
glowball wrote:Uh huh... you guys definitely need more backing than that. The only one who's bothered to make any sort of a case is Packbat but he is just suspect

...half a second.

*checks dictionary*

Yep, that's hypocritical. Elaborate your case on me, please.

Still need this, glowball.

Packbat · Post Post #222 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:12 am

Also, many, many boos for all the 1v1 talk - that only makes sense when we can be confident that a pair of players contains exactly one scum, and no-one has offered any reason to think this is the case at

any

time the offer was made.

Empking · Post Post #223 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:13 am

glowball wrote:or HELL we can get me today so you guys can drop this hiplop scumteam thing and then tomorrow all of you sheep me to victory EVEN if I am dead you will kill PackBat> Izak>CSL

Yeah no way is it a glow/hip team

glowball · Post Post #224 (ISO) » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:14 am

Packbat wrote:
Packbat wrote:
glowball wrote:Uh huh... you guys definitely need more backing than that. The only one who's bothered to make any sort of a case is Packbat but he is just suspect

...half a second.

*checks dictionary*

Yep, that's hypocritical. Elaborate your case on me, please.

Still need this, glowball.

1. You are opportunistic and scummy.