Nocmen wrote:mykonian's post, with this playerlist, makes me ask the following questions about meta, to all of the players.
1. How often do you feel you use meta as an argument in Mafia?
2. Do you prefer proactive (using as a reason to investigate a player's actions) or reactive (using to backup/contradict what a player did) meta?
3. How often are you to research meta on a player whose meta you don't know in the game?
4. Do you prefer to use meta to defend a player as being town, or attack them for being scum?
And My answers:
1. Occasionally, only as needed in a tough situation, once or twice a game, but never in a high pressure situation like end game. I prefer to use it as a way of noting a disconnect in thinking/actions.
2. Reactive, I'll almost only use it as a way of backing up reasoning in the game.
3. Rarely. I try to use it when it's brought up, and see if I agree with it, if it's a player whose meta I don't know.
4. Both, leaning towards the attacking/scum arguements.
1) Very little.
2) proactive
3) If the meta is the reasoning behind the vote/wagoning, I don't mind looking it up.
4) Defend someone been town.
Fate wrote:VOTE: Katsuki
Ill confirm later.
Parabollocks is scum.
FATE Y U DO THIS?
U SAY U FIND SCUM, YET VOTE KATSUKI?!
Katsuki is obvious vig bait,y not go after scum first?
Ellibereth wrote:Hurricanes suck.
Though I should be blown back to normalcy latest sometime tomorrow.
Vote: No lynch
Obvious jester is obvious.
Because someone needs to vote you