Open 331: No Lynching Town - Game Over!

[glowball]

NO! I compromised yesterday and ended up hammering izak. I want Packbat lynched and if I am wrong then you can lynch me or I'll sheep you

[Ellibereth]

He's been opportunistically putting people at L-1. His join date suggests he should have more sense than that. It's like he switches to whatever wagon he thinks will be lynched. THEN when I called him out for it and voted him, he OMGUS me without the vote but by association claiming that I am Hip's scumpartner.

Is it still these reasons?

[Empking]

NO! I compromised yesterday and ended up hammering izak. I want Packbat lynched and if I am wrong then you can lynch me or I'll sheep you

But you're probably right.

[glowball]

@ellibereth...Yes, that and I have a problem with people who post first after kills but that's just a little thing

@emp... then let's lynch packbat a scum lynch is a scum lynch

[Ellibereth]

post first after kills?
and let me pull up old response to that wait

[glowball]

oh goodness, I don't care if you disagree. I want him lynched. PERIOD.

[Ellibereth]

wait I never responded to it before, though I did. >.>
and callllllm down glowwww, hypocrite me wants to wait for Packbat to dance around a little.
Time helps.

[glowball]

I am calm. I am just tired of all of this. There is no reason to want CSL lynched and emp wanted him hammered on page 1, that was silly. Packbat is throwing around shit cases. Hiplop is floating through the game. The only person I even really think is town is you Ellibereth but you are working my last nerve.

[hiplop]

how am i floating..my case has been pretty obvious all game ._.

[Empking]

@emp... then let's lynch packbat a scum lynch is a scum lynch

CSL will be easier to lynch.

[Fenchurch]

First Vote Count of Day Two

CSL - 2 (Empking, hiplop)

hiplop - 1 (Packbat)
Packbat - 1 (glowball)

Not voting: 2 (CSL, Ellibereth)

With six alive, it will take four votes to lynch.

Deadline is: Wednesday, 21 September at 17:07 GMT.

[glowball]

@emp... then let's lynch packbat a scum lynch is a scum lynch

CSL will be easier to lynch.

why is that because you and hiplop are working together?

[hiplop]

EMP killing packbat would be just as easy probably.

[glowball]

No I just see Emp lining up lynches. He wants CSL lynched and did since page 1 with no reasoning. Now he wants CSL lynched and will give me Packbat tomorrow, knowing full and well that if we mislynch today tomorrow is lylo. Not to mention Emp wasn't on the hiplop wagon yesterday. I might go for a hiplop wagon, just to out emp since he's never placed his vote there.

VOTE: hiplop

[CSL]

Vote: hiplop

Hammer, please. I'm not having him not lynched again. Throw away your wimp hats and hammer this fool.

[hiplop]

you just hammered CSL

[glowball]

No he didnt. Thats only 3 votes, it takes 4 to lynch.

[hiplop]

oh my bad

[Empking]

@emp... then let's lynch packbat a scum lynch is a scum lynch

CSL will be easier to lynch.

why is that because you and hiplop are working together?

That makes no sense. If we were working together and that's why CSL was easier we could've just moved onto Pack. The problem is that Elli doesn't find Pack scummy.

[Ellibereth]

pack reply to glow's casemathing
then I'll decide
to vote you or hip or csl
though I already have a good idea of who in my head

[Packbat]

pack reply to glow's casemathing
then I'll decide
to vote you or hip or csl
though I already have a good idea of who in my head

Casemathing? Are you talking about the L-1 votes? I've placed more L-1 votes than anyone else, but I've placed more

votes

than anyone else - and if you look at L-1 + L-2 votes, I'm in the middle of the pack. It's a statistical anomaly, nothing more.

[Ellibereth]

i think that's not the only reason he wants you dead.

[Packbat]

He disagrees with my cases? Help me out, here - I'm looking through glowball's ISO and I'm not finding much else.

(a) If you're wondering why I changed my vote right when he talked to me (#162, "I have a bad feeling about" being his entire case at that point), I have a general rule: whenever someone asks me "why are you doing

x

?", I translate that to "should you be doing

x

?" and answer that question instead.

(b) If you're wondering about the contradiction between my dropping an L-1 vote and my not wanting a quick hammer - I'm not afraid of L-1. I didn't want a

hammer

at just that second, but it wouldn't be a huge problem if we had got one, particularly if (as I believed at that point) there was a reasonable likelihood it would be on scum. In a game where even the newest player was fairly aware of hammer possibilities, I had no fear of an accident, and

intention

is likely to be informative. In other words: the cost of a hammer times the

risk

of a hammer was less than the benefit of the L-1, in my reckoning.

Give me something to work with, here. The last time he gave an explicit case it was for the L-1 thing and that's it.

[Ellibereth]

that's your discussion with him
i don't get why I had to be the one to initiate it.
(I'll read through that later, starcraft beckons >.>)

[glowball]

HEY Ellibereth, I changed my vote. Hammer hiplop.