Urgh. LLD goddamnit. no.
You're saying I'm active lurking? Well I might not be the factory of precious scumhunting walls but I have been pretty honest with my reads. This is how I play, I watch and I vote. Sometimes I ask questions. That's really it.
Two major points that I want to rebuff.
ISO 12: States that Amrun is scummy, keeps his vote there, and then says Re: the Iam Wagon -> "Looks bad, will likely be the lynch for today."
But keeps his vote on Amrun???
Look back up to ISO 1/2. Where I call him out for not pushing his wagon and sticking to it (being non-committal). He now SWITCHES HIS STANCE ENTIRELY, to avoid voting for Iam .
This is SCUM.
THERE WAS LITERALLY NO POINT FOR ME TO VOTE IAM AT THAT TIME. He was at L-3 and I didn't want the day to end any time soon. So I camped my vote on Amrun a while. So I ask you why is this scum?
ISO 22/23: !!! !!! !!! WARNING. SCUM DETECTED. He states he agrees that Klazam is "likely town" but tries to discredit him as confirmed town based on the iamausername flip. Does so with a weak meta reference. VERY SCUMMY.
The main point of this was to figure out why Regfan thought the result confirmed Klazam as town, which I found odd. Klazam ruined it by answering the question first.
ISO 40: MORE SCUM. "Is Andrius town?" and a unprecedented vote on Plum. I wouldn't find it scummy... except that he is now voting me for basically the same thing.
"Not explaining anything for your votes."
Hypocrisy is scummy in this sense.
This is not why I'm voting you. I'm voting you cause you're tunneling on town and hopelessly trying to twist every little thing I say into a scumtell. Like I said before this is the same exact bullshit you pulled in Camden: you take some innoccuous thing someone says, you see how you can twist it and turn it into a "scumslip" and voila you get yourself a nice little mislynch.
