Secret Society Mafia - Game Over

EtherealCookie · Post Post #15 (isolation #0) » Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:35 am

/Confirm

EtherealCookie · Post Post #74 (isolation #1) » Mon Sep 26, 2011 1:12 pm

Vote:Otolia

BECAUSEICAN

EtherealCookie · Post Post #83 (isolation #2) » Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:05 pm

What is this nonsense? How does he even know one of them is anti-town to start with?

EtherealCookie · Post Post #224 (isolation #3) » Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:36 am

I don't think a few votes with little substance to them pressured GW to claiming miller as a scum. Claiming miller earlier on would've been the right thing to do, but I don't exactly consider claiming miller a few pages in as some sort of scum tell.
I am content to switch my vote to Jakalope now. He stated that one of the three he chose were scum, and then later stated that he wasn't hundred percent positive about it but thought so, yet had little evidence for feeling that way except for "their interactions." It seems like a poor case made to appear as if scum hunting.

Unvote

Vote: TheJakalope

EtherealCookie · Post Post #305 (isolation #4) » Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:54 am

Unvote

Vote: IceGuy

EtherealCookie · Post Post #370 (isolation #5) » Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:04 pm

In post 357, IceGuy wrote:

Regarding opportunistic voting: I'm not talking about all people who are voting me, I'm talking about players such as EtherealCookie.

ISO #0: Confirming.
ISO #1: RVS.
ISO #2: One sentence regarding player in ISO #3.
ISO #3: Paragraph consisting mostly of things other people have said and voting a player who is in the center of criticism and gaining votes.
ISO #4: Vote on me without justification, just as my wagon is getting hot.

And I'm not saying "without justification I accept", I'm saying literally without justification:

In post 305, EtherealCookie wrote:
Unvote

Vote: IceGuy

That's not even pretending to scumhunt.

Or BBmolla:

ISO #0: Confirming.
ISO #1/#2: RVS.
ISO #3: Asking Muffin whether he is scum.
ISO #4: Stand-by post.
ISO #5: Accusing people of being scum because of their reactions to the question in ISO #3.
ISO #6: Defense as he got called out for little activity.
ISO #7: Preparing to join the Otolia wagon as it's getting hot.
ISO #8: Vote on me without justification, just as my wagon is getting hot:

In post 322, BBmolla wrote:UNVOTE:

VOTE: Iceguy

This is a lynch I can support atm.

I need to get a full reread here pretty soon, gonna try to take notes to gather all my thoughts.

Or Bogre (not voting me but has shown similar behavior):
ISO #0: Confirming.
ISO #1: Vote on Baby Spice with one-liner along the lines of "I agree", as the wagon is getting hot.
ISO #2: Same for Otolia.
ISO #3: One-sentence FOSing StefanB.
ISO #4: One-sentence question to Baby Spice.

Actually, you've been flipping out against everyone that's voted for you, not just those who have given no justification.