i too urge everone to vote, but for some other non/confirmer.MeMe wrote:I urge everyone to
vote: perfect62834
let all who don't confirm perrish!
PlaysWithSquirrels wrote:Nothing says that. If you have a random hunch, then you should say so. Making up a reason that makes no sense is worse because you are going to get less support from other players and/or attract votes.meaning of life 42 wrote:so what says i'm not just throwing votes around on random hunches to get more info for us townies?PlaysWithSquirrels wrote:
Do I want to lynch him? Not at this juncture. Throwing votes around gets information for the town.
meaning of life 42 wrote:thats good, because we all know by now that lurking is intentional.........
*sarcasm*
its still the first day and some how PWS has managed to vote just about everyone and deny the fact that he has jumped votes.
my vote stays for now.
chamber wrote:And yet its my reason, deal with it or lynch me.meaning of life 42 wrote:chamber wrote:The crash killed my feel for the game, I was posting before it, I'll post again once I have it back.
i never have a feel for any of the games and yet i post...... losing a "feel" for a game is a bad excuse to me.
chamber wrote:And yet its my reason, deal with it or lynch me.meaning of life 42 wrote:chamber wrote:The crash killed my feel for the game, I was posting before it, I'll post again once I have it back.
i never have a feel for any of the games and yet i post...... losing a "feel" for a game is a bad excuse to me.
PlaysWithSquirrels wrote:Come again? How do you know he's telling the truth?meaning of life 42 wrote:chamber wrote: I'd rather the scum not get my role in the slim chance I make it.
hey, at least if they lynch you well see you weren't lying......
PlaysWithSquirrels wrote:I suggest we start with going after MoL for that obvious slip he just made.Sotty7 wrote:I agree 100% and it's really frustrating me. We are spending all this time talking about Chamber's play style while scum sit back rubbing there hands with glee. To be honest, I have no idea if Chamber is scum or not, I voted him early on because I felt like he was trying to blame the first site crash for his lurking when he already told us all lurking would be intentional. Now he's one of the main contributors to the game and although I don't agree with his whole play style, I also know from past experience it has no real bearing on his alignment.Unvote
Chamber – Who do you suspect in the game so far and why?
I think we actually need to push the focus back on to hunting scum and not on just how annoying Chamber's play style is.
PlaysWithSquirrels wrote:1. Your case against me is "he votes for a lot of people... and stuff." Bravo.meaning of life 42 wrote:way to turn all the attention onto me and off of your scummyness......... it was a simple mistake and people make them from time to time.
Confirm Vote: PWS
2. It's a slip that I wouldn't expect someone with as much experience as you have to make. You just implied you knew what Chamber's alignment was. You're right, that is a simple mistake for scum to make. You should pay better attention to what you are saying.
Patrick wrote:I just thought about this thing where if we have a tie two ppl will be lynched. Maybe that is something we could use? Not necessarily now, but it's worth remembering. I could see it being useful in some situations near the end of the game.
meaning of life 42 wrote:Patrick wrote:I just thought about this thing where if we have a tie two ppl will be lynched. Maybe that is something we could use? Not necessarily now, but it's worth remembering. I could see it being useful in some situations near the end of the game.
thats only if we take another 5 pages for one day and require a deadline in the future....
but its a though.
i don't think i had realized that perfect# hadn't posted at all....... and it was just kind of a random pick of people that hadn't spoken in a while.....but non the less the vote is no longer on you.bertrand wrote:any reason you chose me, who posted at least a bit, over perfect#, who I believe has posted 0 times all game?meaning of life 42 wrote: and since no 3 people find the same person scummy..........lets start with the lurkers.
unvote
vote: bertrand
sound good to you guys?
MeMe wrote:Originally, when DGB thought Y & Stoofer were tied at deadline, the thread was locked and it looked like they both were gonna melt. But when it turned out that Y would be the only one dying, the post was edited and an extension granted. Anyone have any thoughts on why that might be?