395: Big Lebowski -- game is dead :(

warpdragon · Post Post #13 (isolation #0) » Mon Jan 01, 2007 5:43 am

/Confirm

warpdragon · Post Post #62 (isolation #1) » Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:55 pm

How much can scum really accomplish without any previous days or abilities to use? The connection is interesting, but I think it could be placed on the back burner until later in the game. Logically, I find Riktus's argument more legitimate, however, I do not think his conclusions warrant action. On the other hand, day one bandwagons are fun.

Vote Colonel Kurtz

warpdragon · Post Post #188 (isolation #2) » Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:36 am

chaotic_diablo wrote:
willows_weep wrote:OOo...I need to do a read through. But I do know that B_k is dead. He was the inventor. And pro-town. The mod said so
Oh look, a comment on the night kills, scumtell!

Didn't you just get through telling us that common scumtells (ie. voting no lynch; post 161) are not necessarily (if at all) scumtells?

Vote:c_d

warpdragon · Post Post #192 (isolation #3) » Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:53 pm

Then you're wrong. An experienced player voting no lynch isn't a scumtell.

Voting for a no lynch day 1, etc., is commonly (ie by at least a significant minority, if not a majority) considered a possible scum tell, as evidenced by the fact that this argument is taking place. You say that it is not a scum tell for an experienced player. It can be assumed that anyone who is not experienced is a newbie, and therefore are not subject to scumtells since they do not yet fully comprehend the game and its subtleties. Maybe the jump I take from this point to scumtells in general is a little large, but nevertheless you appear to be acting upon sarcasm (my original quote of you in conjunction with your vote in that same post), which is very odd.

warpdragon · Post Post #209 (isolation #4) » Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:17 am

Adele wrote:With 10 living, it takes 6 to lunch

Lunch?

C_D, the point was that you called it a scumtell in a very sarcastic tone (at least from my POV) and then voted on it.

warpdragon · Post Post #211 (isolation #5) » Sun Mar 11, 2007 11:13 am

The phrasing in

Oh look, a comment on the night kills, scumtell!

definitely seems sarcastic. Atticus seems to think so too.

warpdragon · Post Post #228 (isolation #6) » Wed Mar 14, 2007 3:46 pm

Yes, to all four sentences.

warpdragon · Post Post #253 (isolation #7) » Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:13 am

The Central Scrutinizer wrote:
unvote, vote: mastermind of sin

Care to explain that? And the C_D vote.

Unvote, vote tcc

warpdragon · Post Post #255 (isolation #8) » Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:21 am

The Central Scrutinizer wrote:
unvote, vote: mastermind of sin

Care to explain that? And the C_D vote.

Unvote, vote tcc

warpdragon · Post Post #256 (isolation #9) » Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:28 am

Argh double post.

Anyways, he's supposed to have them, but what about post 197?

warpdragon · Post Post #302 (isolation #10) » Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:50 pm

I've kind of been neglecting my posting duties because I haven't always been able to find the time. Its been a very busy few months.

Anyways, regarding the logic behind the whole TCC, when I initially voted him, I saw a contentless vote and jumped on it. When I decided not to unvote him after being reminded of his restriction, I was mainly looking at his going away post. He seemed to be asking the mod in the post itself. If I had a posting restriction, I would ask the mod in a PM, and then post if it was acceptable. It didn't feel right that he was asking right there. He had also violated the pattern of one unvote/vote per post in his second post and quoted in his fourth. Normally, this would mean that he was faking a restriction, and that would be scummy. However, it turned out that the mod was letting him slip up in his restrictions.

When I changed my vote off of CD there were several reasons. First, a scummier target presented himself, in my opinion. Secondly, a mason is a difficult claim to fake in the long run, especially in a mini. At best it is a stalling tactic. The exception is when a second scum also claims mason, but that is very risky. Thirdly, my vote on CD had also accomplished its goal, as of his post 227.

warpdragon · Post Post #305 (isolation #11) » Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:11 pm

Atticus wrote:Getting him to claim was your goal?

No, to admit that it could be misinterpreted.

warpdragon · Post Post #316 (isolation #12) » Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:51 am

You were already voting me, otherwise it would have been lynch -1. Is that what you want to occur? Do you want a claim? Also, could you show me where I contradicted myself?

warpdragon · Post Post #330 (isolation #13) » Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:34 pm

Right now there are two people voting me and the same two are calling for a claim. If some of the rest of the town wants a claim, I will claim.

warpdragon · Post Post #334 (isolation #14) » Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:48 am

Well, thats four.

I am the rug.

warpdragon · Post Post #342 (isolation #15) » Mon Apr 30, 2007 1:37 pm

Townie

And it does say rug, not carpet.

warpdragon · Post Post #345 (isolation #16) » Tue May 01, 2007 1:50 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:Hmm. It's a good name-claim, but I'm not sure if I believe that there are any vanillia townies left.

If there are any left? We haven't lost any to begin with.