Policy Discussion: Invitationals

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #1 (isolation #0) » Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:42 am

1: yes. It requires people to do their best and be respected (and for those who want it: ego boosting)
2: 1 half a year/every 3 months?
3: Basic normal. It requires the "real" skill
4: Polling... Make sign ups and let everyone sign up... then make groups of 10 and let them vote for the three best players (checkbox!) and repeat until you have the amount of players you want...

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #12 (isolation #1) » Mon Jan 22, 2007 6:32 am

Well, it'll be worth it. And I agree with glork's point 4.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #26 (isolation #2) » Tue Jan 23, 2007 8:45 pm

There is no "best" player... The only thing that exists is "best player in the game", and even that is questionable.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #28 (isolation #3) » Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:34 pm

"Best player" is flawed. There are people who put more effort into the game then others, people who helped the 'scum community the last couple of years and people who are just sorta "common names". I think these kind of categories are better then just "best player".

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #36 (isolation #4) » Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:34 pm

Why not make a game where everyone who wants to play in it can sign up... just basic roles but nobody left out (thus no "omg, i'm not in, I hate you"). Yes, it will be a big game then, but I think i'd be fun.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #72 (isolation #5) » Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:19 pm

omg... i'm getting flashbacks... of something zin and glork might know about...