Mafia 61: No Theme - Game over!

[Raging Rabbit]

Vote:Mole

Vote: Cheesefan

.

You should know I dislike unexplained votes

[Raging Rabbit]

Vote: Paper

. Coz I am rock. And/or roll. But definitely a bit of funk.

You should vote scissors, then.

FOS: TJM

for crap logic.

[Raging Rabbit]

You should lay low, then. Claiming rock is just stupid...

[Raging Rabbit]

Vote: IH

Why? Cause he is scum

The Kangaroo is always right.

I don't like the "IH is scum!!1" thing one bit, and find you more suspicious than Twito for jumping on it.

You're also a newb, and therefore not part of that in-joke.

FOS: Twito

, mostly for spamming the thread.

Unvote, vote: pevergreen

.

[Raging Rabbit]

Rabbit: That just seems like a newb wanting to fit into the group, rather than someone being scum.

And what role makes you want to fit in the most? Scum, of course. Bloody conformists.

[Raging Rabbit]

unvote, vote:Raging Rabbit

= | I don't like your logic.

Why?

It's not a very strong case or anything, just better than a random vote for my money.

You are absolutely right there is no way I would be spamming the thread if I were to be town.
Unvote
Vote: RR
IH is scum removed from sig. We can lynch him later on, he is not that annoying.

Not if you're town and helpful, no. The primary intention of the FOS was getting you to stop, which I'm glad you did, though you are a bit scummy for pushing that logic enough to actually make people follow you.

I can't help but feeling there are ulterior motives for that vote... *cough*boardgamemafia*cough*

RR, what type of logic is that...

Disagree? Explain why.

...and why only Twito, I know some people who were spamming just as much.

But Twito's the spammer king (10 posts so far), and did a pretty good job of distracting the town. It was mostly to get him to stop, as I said.

[Raging Rabbit]

The FOS doesn't really make any difference to me. There is nuttin you can do to change the way I'm sorry to disappoint you. It will only encourage me.

You seem to have stopped the "IH is scum!!1" thing, so my main objective is achieved.

[Raging Rabbit]

Yes we passed first couple of pages so it has stopped.

Maybe it's just a coincidence you stopped it right after I FOSed you, I'm satisfied either way.

Thanks to you of course for spamming us through those couple of pages.

You have thrice as many spam posts as me.

[Raging Rabbit]

Thanks.

What's ftw?

[Raging Rabbit]

You calling me new when I signed up before you.... confused.

You're too new to be part of that in joke, so I didn't like how you joined the IH wagon. The fact that I'm also a noob is irrelevant, I'm not part of that in joke either.

I get on the IH/Twito thing because its the same at my other mafia site. The two main players vote each other first in every game. It's funny.

It's certainly possible you were just trying an MS style joke vote, but that vote still smells a little fishy and as I said you're better than a random vote for my money.

[Raging Rabbit]

Btw, Twito - DP seems to find you scummier than I do, why address my FOS but not his vote?
Also, if you accept my explanation for the FOS, why are you still voting me?

[Raging Rabbit]

Well, you're better than a random vote for me.

Why?

Lots of peole seem to dislike my vote on pevergreen (I'm on 6 votes atm), none of them has yet to explain exactly why that is. What's wrong with my logic?

[Raging Rabbit]

I don't accept your explanation for the FOS. FOS means Finger of Suspicion and I don't see how me spamming is suspicious meaning that you ain't really hunting scum.

It is a bit suspicious since you pushed it hard enough for people to start following you (DP's point, basically), but I mostly figured it was just threatning enough to get you to stop. It's not like a page 3 FOS is that big a deal.

DP's explanation for his vote however makes sence if he is seeing me and IH triade for the first time

True. You also have no real way to defend yourself other than saying it's a joke now that I think of it, you I'll concede the point.

I dislike with logic behind that vote aswell.

Why

?

But your wagon is idd growing so nice and fast that I'm getting suspicious about it.

It is growing rather uncomfortably fast, yes.

Then again you are gonna tell me I can't possibly be suspicious of people joining wagon in which I'm already in but that's just bullshit.

Try to keep our other games out of this one, please. I promise to try as well.

[Raging Rabbit]

Unvote

fos:RR

the way u are acting, it is like you are scum. you are trying to get someone lynched for trying to fit in???

Err, no. I'm voting him for jumping on what looked liked the start of a wagon, and he doesn't have the "It's a joke!" excuse since he isn't a part of that joke.

Not the strongest logic ever, I know, but it's certainly better than nothing and I can't see what's so inherently wrong with it. Can someone please open my eyes?

[Raging Rabbit]

We are not starting fresh from 0 info. I have played with plenty of people here before and I'm not ignoring the information that provides me with. It's not unfair information coz everyone here is able to read past games if they wish.
I'm however not going to quote ongoing games or something stupid like that, don't worry.

I'd explain the difference since I think it's very distinct, but don't feel too much like quoting other games either. Until we know each other's alignment there it's also not too useful to draw information from that game, IMO.

[Raging Rabbit]

I'm not referring to any game in particular.

You are, actually.

I'm also going to quote other ended games if I feel it's useful.

Generally speaking, nothing wrong with that. We don't have any completed games with each other, though.

[Raging Rabbit]

I'm not referring to only you in particular. You taking this so personally is rising my scumwibes about you again.

Then again you are gonna tell me I can't possibly be suspicious of people joining wagon in which I'm already in but that's just bullshit.

What's this, then?

ffs, im getting damn sick of these stupid arguments between Raging Rabbit and Twito. Im sure that one oif them is Mafia-possibly both, in opposing groups. I'm going to Unvote, Vote: Raging Rabbit, because i generally dislike the way he almost bullies Twito.

I'd really like you to show me how I'm bullying Twito, otherwise I'm gonna count this as another no-logic vote. I don't think it's even possible to actually be bullied through the interent, unless you have a real weak character and I assure you Twito's very stubborn. Also, I'm sure he doens't want you as his bodyguard.

I actually think it's very possible we're both pro-town, I'm not all that suspicious of Twito in this games as you might have noticed, just arguing points I consider to be worthy to argue with.

FOS: BM

for casting a 7th vote with very feeble reasoning. Would've been a vote if I didn't know you're prone to crap logic, but worry not - keep it up and I'll vote you soon enough.

I would again like to ask my wagoners to explain what's so wrong with my pevergreen vote.

[Raging Rabbit]

I actually feel bullied, have a real weak character and want a bodyguard.

I'm pretty sure you're just pissed off at me for reasons that have nothing to do with this game. Do you honestly want BM as your bodyguard? You hate the guy...

[Raging Rabbit]

I'm actually just playing mafia which doesn't really have anything to do with personal feelings. I'm not pissed off at you, don't worry. I will only lynch you if I think you are scummy.

I don't hate you, either. I also really don't fancy the idea of being your arch nemesis or something, so I'm hoping we'll never resort to that.

I still think your reference to our other game was unfair, but I trust it won't repeat itself.

Do you honestly feel bullied by our little argument in this game?

unvote, vote:BM

Quit wagoning you shameless wagoner!
Also you others, FOS:Pever, Keysmath

Stop it! You shouldn't jump on a wagon that far advanced when we're barely out of the random stage!

I really don't get why you'd make such a post without unvoting me yourself.

@RR:I didn't like your logic of putting a vote on someone for trying to be in the joke, but not being there. How is that even... better than a random vote vote?

I'm voting him for jumping on your wagon that made it to like 4 or 5 votes without any reason. Your other wagoners have the excuse of it being a joke, pevergreen doesn't. If there's anything wrong with this logic, I'd love for you to explain just what.

Unvote vote:RR
Let us lynch of one these two. I'm tired of people arguing about stupid things.

Huh? That's like, 7th vote purely for being annoyed with me and Twito? Now

this

is helluva lot better than a random vote.

Unvote, vote blahgo

.

[Raging Rabbit]

unvote, vote:BM

Quit wagoning you shameless wagoner!
Also you others, FOS:Pever, Keysmath

Stop it! You shouldn't jump on a wagon that far advanced when we're barely out of the random stage!

I really don't get why you'd make such a post without unvoting me yourself.

Only you did unvote, and I'm an idiot. Sorry.

[Raging Rabbit]

useless at catching scum?
so far, on this site, i have been proven right about 1/2 of my Mafia suspicions. Pretty solid record for someone who's play-style seems beneath contempt....

I don't care what your record is, coincidences happen. In your only other game I'm aware of, your logic sucks on a regualr basis. If you really are pro town, You should really start thinking more before coming out with these far fetched theories.

anyway, RR, if you think im Mafia vote for me. If you dont, dont vote for me.

You can point out suspicons and faulty logic without voting, you know.

Dont just threaten to OMGUS me, for no reason other than that i voted for you.

I'm not saying you're suspicious for voting me alone, I'm saying your suspicious for putting me on 7 vote with very shaky logic.

My vote stands because i still think ur the scummiest person here

Why

? Where exactly am I "bullying Twito"?

(although that image is held through several games i share with you)

We only share one other game, and you're not voting me there.

[Raging Rabbit]

I read that like 10 times decided that I don't understand it as to me it looked like unvote at the same post you quoted and decided not to ask about it.

Weird, I'd have figured you'd go for me guns blazing.

Anyway, friends?

[Raging Rabbit]

Friends. <3 Believe me I have nothing personal againts you.

[hint to all]None of the 'scummers has asked me to be their valentine yet[/B]

<3

You'll excuse me if I pass on that...

[Raging Rabbit]

Then again getting into a scrap with Twito makes sence.

We're both equally guilty of that, and it wasn't much of a scrap either.

Dice Roll:
Original Roll String: 1d21
1 21-Sided Dice Results: 16

I'd like to nominate this for most useless post of the game so far and that's saying a lot.

Seriously though, we're 5 pages into the thread and that was your first post unless I'm much mistaken. Why random vote without giving us any input whatsoever?

[Raging Rabbit]

I voted Raging Rabbit a while back.

Why

?

[Raging Rabbit]

Umm, because it's my first post? Duh. 5 pages isn't very far, and I open 99% of my games with the dice roll, unless I'm replacing into a game. I'm not about to change that any time soon.

Adaptation is a very important thing, you should give it a try sometime.

While I'm willing to accept the die role thing is your regular playstyle, a page five random vote with so many other real stuff going on is completely useless and therefore scummy.

[Raging Rabbit]

Alright you wagoners, you're doing it again! You jump off of RR and jump onto Blahgo! Quit following two or three peoples logic.

I don't suspect the blahgo wagoners thus far. He's wagon makes a lot more sense than my yet-to-be-explained one imo, and he isn't in any real danger of a lynch atm. Voting him seems a better tactic than standing around whistling...

RR, please explain how something useless is scummy. TWITO IS USELESS, and he's not speed lynched!

Scum are more prone to play useless townies, nay? Also, uselessness should always be somewhat suspected imo, since it helps get people to stop being useless.

I don't find Twito useless thus far, just really spam-my.

[Raging Rabbit]

I didn't vote blahgo because I wanted to see how the wagon would develope. I finds it's developing scummy. I'll stick to RR as I see scum trying to replace RR wagon with blahgo wagon. I'm not yet ready to name people who would be this scum on blahgo wagon nor ignoring the option of blahgo actually being scum. His wagon does include RR tho.

I see people jumping off an unexplained wagon and moving to a far better one. Not sure what's wrong with that.

I find people jumping on MoS for his dice roll scummy. Especially if they keep pushing after explanation. MoS where do you find those always so sweet dice rolls I used to use them and had the page in my favourites but lost and I'd like to use them again. Btw RR is one of those people jumping on MoS coz of this but not voting. I believe this to be based on blahgo wagon being hotter.

Random vote on page 5 = useless and scummy, 7th vote for bad reason = useless and way scummier. I rest my case.

I'm sure you understand why I'm keeping my vote on RR.

I think your playstyle is to generally ignore logic and analyze wagon advancements instead. I'm getting the feeling that whether I say I suspect X for reasons that make sense or because god told me to, you'd register it in the same exact way - "RR suspecting X", which you later use to figure out who's scum with mostly mathematical reasoning. I don't think it's a very wise way to play (I still <3 you, though).

It's especially unwise given my playstyle, which is basically to point out any logical fallacies I see. I'm therefore usually gonna be throwing minor suspicions at a whole bunch of people, and if you keep registering these as "RR suspecting X" instead of listening to my logic I'm getting the feeling you'll find me scummy in all our games together. I'm not asking you to change your playstyle, but since I'm not gonna be changing mine anytime soon I'd like for you to learn to adapt me.

[Raging Rabbit]

My scumdar in last 10 games where I've been lynching people has been 100% correct so I really trust it.

I hate to disagree with you again, but I really dislike that logic. You almost sound like BM.

RR, they don't provide reasons or anything. It's just WAGONWAGONWAGON. They get over 3 votes, and the wagoners attack.

Than they're stupid and bad for the town.

Like Fritz.

Fritz is special. Special in a bad-for-the-town-y way, but still.

[Raging Rabbit]

Errr, that's what I was saying. You said that the blorzspjaf(bloargh) wagoners weren't too bad, because they were wagoning for a good reason (which is apparently undivulged) and your wagon was worse.

I misunderstood you, then. I figure the blorajkag wagoners just agree that 7th vote for no good reason is very scummy, and agreeing with good logic isn't a scummy thing to do unless you overdo it, which they aren't since it's still early day 1.

[Raging Rabbit]

lol, didn't see there's a page 7...

.....YOU JUST LURKED AND HOPPED BANDWAGONS WITH LITTLE JUSTIFICATION!

unvote, vote:Zarvok

I really don't think he did, his logic's fine as far as I'm concerned.

1.There wasn't really a wagon.

It sorta was. The next best thing at that time, at least.

2.That was a random vote. Do you consider this scummy?

Personally I don't, just saying you did have a bit of a wagon there.

3.How is he more scummy than the three people who said it before him?

His logic sucked more than any of theirs, and that's saying a lot. Also, higher number of vote=scummier.

I feel like you're doing the same thing as him. Hopping onto a bandwagon. In case you haven't been able to tell, I've been TRYING to go after you guys for just about this whole game about just bandwagoning. Mostly for the new people, because this 21 player game seems loaded down to the core with them....

You have no idea how much I've been arguing with unexplained wagoning recently, I just feel that isn't the case here.

[Raging Rabbit]

1) This is possibly true, but there were a bunch of people voting IH. A few random "IH IS SCUM!!!" votes at the beginning appear to be something to expect around here, but it still concerns me after the first few, no need to bandwagon when there are other equally good random votes

2) He was still random voting on page 3? After he had already randomvoted once? He himself pointed out it was a bandwagon vote.

3) The more votes on a wagon, the more scummy the next vote seems. The first vote isn't a wagon at all, it doesn't seem particularly scummy, but as a wagon gets bigger, the potential to jump on it for a quick lynch exists.

In summary: it's not enough to reason about each individual post, it's the pattern of hopping from bandwagon to bandwagon that seems concerning. My vote is different than his, since I provide a thought out and reasoned justification for it based on his voting pattern, whereas his votes come with no explanation whatsoever. These two things seem very different to me...

:goodposting: (was posted simultaneously with mine)

I'd just like to note that even his scummy vote for me alone is enough of a reason to vote him, imo.

[Raging Rabbit]

Why don't you tell me who is acting scummy instead of attacking people over a freaking dice roll.

blahgo is. You should generally decide that on your own, though...

This is exactly why I DO use the dice roll, because I am sick and tired of people calling me scum for making a random vote that's based off anything, even if I just pointed at a name and typed it up. The dice function is completely random, so there is no indication of alignment when the vote is cast.

The problem isn't your reason for random voting, the problem is you random voted

at all

. On page 5, that's completely useless.

I hadn't even read the thread yet.

If you just didn't have the time but wanted to let us know you were in the game, why random vote intead of just posting "I'm here, will read when I have the time"?

If you didn't read the first 5 pages on general principle, well, shame on you.

Uh, who cares? 7 games isn't all that much. I've played in nearly 100 on mafiascum alone, if you count ongoing games. Clearly you haven't had a lot of experience with mafia if you think anything important is going to happen in the first 5 pages.

I don't much care for these "whose got the bigger dick" arguments. There's been tons if important stuff going on in those pages, and saying otherwise without even bothering to read them is just stupid.

If anything, you should be thanking me for somehow sparking discussion with a random vote instead of FOSing me for it.

That's quite a twisted way to look on things. The

only

reason your random vote sparked discussion is that it's worthy of a FOS...

[Raging Rabbit]

[quote"IH"]Raging Rabbit, that reply to MoS's post would probably have more oomph behind it if his post was aimed at you. [/quote]

I don't care what who it was aimed at, I'm responding to everything I consider bad logic. Also, I was one of the people who suspected his 5 page random vote so it was aimed at me in a way.

Also, I don't believe you ever answered my question. Why do you think Useless=Scummy? 1 useless action.

I did, actually:

Scum are more prone to play useless townies, nay? Also, uselessness should always be somewhat suspected imo, since it helps get people to stop being useless.

Why do you encourage him to talk MORE?

<3

Can I ask why? I'm just curious. It seems to me that IH made some unfounded accusations and I showed how he was mistaken. I guess my tone was a little extreme and the "crap logic" bit was over the top - was that it?

My take - the FOS was a bit OMGUSy and over the edge, otherwise it wans't that scummy.

So the scum will get fed up with my badgering and nagging and give up. Duh.

I honestly like your playstyle.

[Raging Rabbit]

IH, I've been scum and I am scum yet, I never been annoyed enough to gve up.

I'm confused, are you claiming mafia?

[Raging Rabbit]

I've been scum refers to being scum in mafia games. I am scum refers to how I act in real life, and playstyle/lifestyle.

So you're claiming mafia in

real life

? Better not lynch you than, I really rather fancy staying alive and am sorta afraid of the consequences. You don't know where I live, though, so I may reconsider. Are you New Yorkish or Italian mafia, btw?

[Raging Rabbit]

No, I am not mafia in real life i mea nthat in real life I act what would be considered scummy on these forums.

Sorry Mr. Corleone, it's too late for you to back down know.

Seriously though, this defence sucks.

[Raging Rabbit]

Things that are supposed to coviced us you're not mafia = defense.
Claiming mafia in real life = bad defence.

[Raging Rabbit]

I'm actually set on my blahgo post. I really don't like what he is trying to say. In my eyes he admitted to being scum and is now trying to create a bullshit reason why he said that. And since I was second to vote for him I don't think I count for his band wagoning.

I really don't think anyone would be stupid enough to actually claim mafia.

That doesn't make his "I'm also scum in RL!" defence any less crappy, though.

[Raging Rabbit]

....

unvote, Vote:Raging Rabbit

Are you kidding me? He didn't just claim he was mafia in real life. He expressed in really butchered English that he plays mafia in REAL LIFE. He's not sure what is considered suspicious on forum mafia and real life mafia.

Blahgo that was also just a joke.

Dude

, there's this slightest chance I was being, like, sarcastic or somethin'. I enjoyed making blahgo Corleone jokes quite a bit, acutally.

His defence still sucks, though, I hope you realize that.

[Raging Rabbit]

Errr, I never saw a defence. I saw him taking my joke about annoying the mafia into confessing as truth.

I believe there was some kind of point about him not acting like that as scum in RL mafia or somethin' like that, and you seemed to agree in your last post.

Even if it was a joke, what's wrong with replying to it with another joke? Why vote me for trying to be funny?

[Raging Rabbit]

I merely asked that in response to the claim that several people were acting scummy. I find it hard to believe that there can be so many true suspects that early in the game, so I pushed him to back up his claim. Note that he has yet to respond to that part of my post.

Regardless, you still haven't chosen to share with us who do you cosider suspicious, nor have you given any indication of reading the first 5 pages. Any reson for that?

I'm merely keeping with tradition . I agree that it was completely useless. In fact, I'll take it one step further and assert that random voting in and of itself is completely useless, regardless of when it happens. However, nearly everyone does it. Does that mean we are all scum?

Random voting early in the game is a good way to get some discussion going, since it can lead to jokewagons and stuff. There's also nothing better to do. Random votes on page 5 are completely and utterly useless, and while I realize you were trying to keep with tradition you really should've placed your vote on someone you actually consider suspicious right now.

Because I always open games with a dice roll vote, and it serves the same purpose as saying that I'm here, because posting at all says I'm here.

Aren't you inclined to say a bit more than that when entering the game at page 5, though?

Please fine-tune your sarcasm-meter. It was subtle, I know.

Sneaky bastard.

[Raging Rabbit]

Unvote: Mos.

I see that you really think it was ok to open up with a random vote on the 5th page, though this is a game of mafia and not a discussion on whether or not that it is a good idea. So, I will drop my vote off of you.

While I agree it definitely wasn't a good idea, I also agree it wasn't all that suspicious. I'm mostly trying to make MoS acknowledge his mistake or possibly give something up in the argument, though I'll keep my eye on him in the future.

For a much better target, people may want to look at B. Corleone.

[Raging Rabbit]

*Important Note* Peole often seem to mistake my tone over the internet and find me offensive. Don't do the same mistake, I never ever try to insult anyone. I'm a really sarcastic guy, and you'll have to adjust your humor detectors if you want us to have fun together. */Important Note*

I has come to my attention that many people seem to find my attempts at humor annoying. If the general consensus in the town is that my jokes are making the game less fun, I'll obviously cut them down a fair bit. I'll appreciate further input on this.

[Raging Rabbit]

...and then again it looks like he himself is pushing for Blahgo lynch as a joke at the same time?

I'm pushing for a blahgo lynch because he put me on seven votes make us shut up. I answered his defence with a joke because it wasn't any good anyways.

<3 RR's humor (Rather the humor than just the normal RR ya know)

<3 Twito's smile.

There may be a new "Rate RR's Playstyle" thread coming up, you and all the other scumchat people who think I'm an asshole are welcome to try and change me there.

[Raging Rabbit]

I merely asked that in response to the claim that several people were acting scummy. I find it hard to believe that there can be so many true suspects that early in the game, so I pushed him to back up his claim. Note that he has yet to respond to that part of my post.

Regardless, you still haven't chosen to share with us who do you cosider suspicious, nor have you given any indication of reading the first 5 pages. Any reson for that?

I hardly have time to find someone suspicious when the game is being cluttered by pointless attacks on me.

I'm merely keeping with tradition . I agree that it was completely useless. In fact, I'll take it one step further and assert that random voting in and of itself is completely useless, regardless of when it happens. However, nearly everyone does it. Does that mean we are all scum?

Random voting early in the game is a good way to get some discussion going, since it can lead to jokewagons and stuff. There's also nothing better to do. Random votes on page 5 are completely and utterly useless, and while I realize you were trying to keep with tradition you really should've placed your vote on someone you actually consider suspicious right now.

I already explained that I highly doubted anyone was going to do something truly voteworthy in a mere 5 pages, and if they had, I could just

change my vote

. Fascinating concept, I know.

Because I always open games with a dice roll vote, and it serves the same purpose as saying that I'm here, because posting at all says I'm here.

Aren't you inclined to say a bit more than that when entering the game at page 5, though?

Nope.

Well, that's just too bad. You're sorta lazy.

[Raging Rabbit]

Maybe there is a sorta fight club thing going on and i am mafia but dont know it.

Does that make me, like, your very own Tyler Durden?

[Raging Rabbit]

*Blatant Advertising*

There's now a Mafia Strategy Thread discussing my game philosophy. Y'all may be interested in checking it out.

*/Blatant Advertising*

Now lets get back to actually playing the game.

[Raging Rabbit]

Vote blahgo.

[Raging Rabbit]

Unless you can't come up with any logical reason to do that.

[Raging Rabbit]

Unless you're either scum or just an idiot?

[Raging Rabbit]

So a 7th vote for basically no reason makes perfect sense to you?

[Raging Rabbit]

The two of you are incredibly original.

[Raging Rabbit]

I'm starting to get the feeling that you are purposely trying to get the game off track, first by your pointless attack on me

Pointless? How so? It's not like I'm pushing for your lynch or anything, I'm just pointing out a play I consider useless.

then with these more recent posts that have nothing to do with this game at all.

Now lets get back to actually playing the game.

???

[Raging Rabbit]

You have posted more distracting posts since then, so you clearly weren't sincere.

Also, FoS: Fircoal, Cheesefan They are also both guilty of this.

BINGO.

Let's have a look at your logic here, shall we:

1. The Infallbile RagingRabbit - 2 joke posts in that (I consider my discussion wih Firecoal relevant), one of which ("Jack's Boiling Cheese") I still consider really funny - you people should be warned I'll never ever pass up on a chance for a Fight Club reference. Anyway, for 2 posts

I'm

obviously the one worthy of a vote.
2. Cheesefan & Firecoal - Like, lots and lost of spam. Really, they should both be standig in the corner feeling all ashamed of themselves. However, you FOS them and keep your vote on the poor bunny...
3.

TWITO

- 5 completely irrelevant posts in before your vote on me, not counting his recent poetical genius. Not worthy of

any

reference?! *cough*scumbuddies*cough*

BIGASSFOS: MOS, smaller fos: Twito

.

[Raging Rabbit]

Rampaging Rabbit,
lynching him will be a habit,
you know you want it to stab it,
oh the horrible wabbit,
we need a destruction kit,
to demolish the raging rabbit,
the raging piece of shit,
in this thread he doesn't fit,
get rid of that chit.

I just found out by sucking hard on MMM: Haiku that my poetic skilz are mostly limited to Hebrew, but otherwise I'd kick your ass.

MoS: Oh no! A 3rd irrelevant post when Twito's only on, like, 8. You should obviously keep your vote on me...

[Raging Rabbit]

Dear Twito and Firecoal, thanks for all your lovely ad hominem. It's always nice to be appreciated. Extremely amusing to note that the two of you are actually blaming me for spamming (hypocrisy alert!), and that Firecoal even manged to miss my point against MoS so very very completely.

xoxo,
Da Infallible RagingRabbit

[Raging Rabbit]

mmm. I'm EXTREMELY happy with my vote on Raging Rabbit.

= )

That's nice. Any comment on MoS comfortably voting me for the most fallacious reason eva, though?

[Raging Rabbit]

While I know Twito far too well to actually expect anything other than pure ad hominem, can any of the other 6 (!!1) guys corrently voting me back themselves up with

anything

other than not liking my vote on pevergreen? Anyone even has an opinion on blahgo voting me to get me and Twito to shut up and/or MoS voting me for something 3 other guys are way more guilty of, while completely forgetting to even mention Twito (with

both

votes putting me at the kinda dangerous lynch -4)? Anyone at all?

[Raging Rabbit]

OK, I'm gonna be frank here - the wagon on me has no base other than people calling me annoying and the pevergreen vote. If you honestly want to lynch me for that, go ahead. There's nothing I can actually say to defend myself from ad hominem. Not gonna argue with Twito anymore, since it's so incredibly useless.

Ta.

[Raging Rabbit]

[quote="IH"]err, no not really I don't find it fallacious at all. You said "Let's get down to playing the game." You have posted some very distracting posts that really didn't have anything to do with the game. MoS Seems to be accusing you of that.

How is this fallacious?
[quote]

MoS accused the whole group of people who spammed on page 9 (?) for distracting the game. Lets have a look at the group:

1. RR - 2 joke posts and strategy thread advertisment (I'm not counting the argument with Firecoal since it was sorta relevant).
2. Cheesefan & Firecoal - Lots and lots of irrelevant stuff. Like 10 each.
3. TWITO - 5 completely irrelevant posts.

Now, MoS suspects this whole bunch of people. His reaction - vote RR, FoS Cheesefan & Firecoal & IGNORE Twito. Doesn't make sense.

Still, like I said, want to lynch me for "being annoying"? That's totally fine.

[Raging Rabbit]

RR keeps repeating words "ad hominem" as his only defence.

Attack me with something that

isn't

irrelevant personal slander, I'll defend myself in a way that

isn't

calling ad hominem.

This is quite possibly my last direct response to you in this game.

[Raging Rabbit]

I want everyone on my wagon to consider the following question - if I get replaced, will you unvote me?

[Raging Rabbit]

Also, since instead of actually listening to what I'm trying to say people just use every single post of mine as an exuse to more bunnyhate, I probably won't be posting in this thread for quite a while.

Twito - dance your fucking heart out.

[Raging Rabbit]

I'm getting replaced here. If you want to lynch my replacement for being formerly me, go ahead.

Twito: your latest comment was one of the most hypocrital things I've ever seen. Just figured I'd let you know.

[Raging Rabbit]

It was a pretty dumb and pretty scummy play, and I feel I explained myself enough on it. Never voted you or pushed for your lynch, though.

[Raging Rabbit]

Only after his later" Vote RR, FOS CF, FC, IGNORE TWIT" move, that made a grand toatl of no sense at all.

But no one's apparantly interested in actually listening to me, so it'll probably be a whole lot easier for you to just lynch me/wait for my replacement.

[Raging Rabbit]

I'm counting on others not wanting to lynch me for being myself, but if they do there's obiously no need for a replacement.

[Raging Rabbit]

really could just be his playstyle.

!!!1

I critisize every bad play I see. Always. Regardless of alignment.

I don't see why no one's acknowledging what I consider obvious evidence that MoS's vote for me is like the most forced thing eva. Also, blahgo put me on 7 for the sole reason of "shutting me up". Again, I'm not sure if you guys are even reading my posts or just voting me to shut me up, but you have no good reason whatsoever to want me lynched, other than because I'm bloody RagingRabbit of course, and even that is getting solved since I'll soon be replaced.

[Raging Rabbit]

Maybe others don't coinsider your "obvious evidence" about MoS proper and don't think the vote was forced.
And I've actually read each and every one of your posts.
And we do have good reasons to get you lynched regardless of being RR.

And I'm really starting to like you it's nice to have someone posting rather than those noobs who don't post anything. Then again the repeating really is annoying.

You really should've explained why exactly do you disagree rather than ignored me altogether.

I've never ever gone for Truth By Repetition, mostly just Stop Fucking Ignoring Me By Repetition. Isn't working either, though.

[Raging Rabbit]

SV, just look at the following post:

While I know Twito far too well to actually expect anything other than pure ad hominem, can any of the other 6 (!!1) guys corrently voting me back themselves up with anything other than not liking my vote on pevergreen? Anyone even has an opinion on blahgo voting me to get me and Twito to shut up and/or MoS voting me for something 3 other guys are way more guilty of, while completely forgetting to even mention Twito (with both votes putting me at the kinda dangerous lynch -4)? Anyone at all?

The fact that no one even bothered to respond to this is my main reason for wanting replacement. I just can't be bothered to deal with personal attacks with no real basis. Sorry.

[Raging Rabbit]

I've faced much worse than that elsewhere (try replacing into a game where you face a ton of personal attacks and the person you replaced was at -1 who'd made a big scum-tell sometime), and stuck it out, and managed to out scum later on.

Having to deal with hatred towards someone else is very different off-play-wise than dealing with hatred toward yourself.

I've also realised that scum are generally the ones who asked for replacement when they're being attacked.

I'm having enough trouble in other games/this site in general atm, and am quite frankly downright suffering in this game atm. I don't see why I should keep this up when it's quite simply no longer any fun, but if you want to blame this on my alignment you're more than welcome to lynch my replacemet. Poor guy, but maybe he'll realize what's it's been like to be me lately. Again, sorry.

[Raging Rabbit]

Note: you should be annoyed with the lurkers who get replaced way more than with the hated bunnies, imho.