Stoofer's 3rd Law

This forum is for discussion related to the game.
User avatar
HackerHuck
HackerHuck
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
HackerHuck
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2830
Joined: July 26, 2006
Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver

Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:03 pm

Post by HackerHuck »

Zindaras wrote:I've actually noticed this before. There is obviously another Stoofer's constant here. I think a good game that would've proved this would have been Mini 372, by Kain. We never got to the part where we did a mass claim, but my role was disbelieved because of balance and such.
I'd disagree on that one. Part of it was the bizarre role, but the way you acted to fit in with that role seemed very scummy.

I also disagree with the 'confirm your ability or die' benefitting the town. If the scum have a roleblocker, that in essence gives them the ability to sabotage any proving of pro-town abilities.
User avatar
HackerHuck
HackerHuck
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
HackerHuck
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2830
Joined: July 26, 2006
Location: On the outskirts of Vancouver

Post Post #37 (isolation #1) » Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:59 pm

Post by HackerHuck »

This all sounds much like the law of diminishing returns...

Return to “Mafia Discussion”