Stoofer's 3rd Law

This forum is for discussion related to the game.
User avatar
Primate
Primate
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Primate
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3909
Joined: April 25, 2006
Location: Notts, UK.

Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:25 am

Post by Primate »

Complexity, yes. I don't think a setup with a large
number
of power roles gives the scum sufficient advantage though, especially if any of those abilities are remotely testable. You end with a situation where it's 'confirm your abilty or die'.
User avatar
Primate
Primate
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Primate
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3909
Joined: April 25, 2006
Location: Notts, UK.

Post Post #21 (isolation #1) » Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:59 am

Post by Primate »

Zindaras wrote:I've actually noticed this before. There is obviously another Stoofer's constant here. I think a good game that would've proved this would have been Mini 372, by Kain. We never got to the part where we did a mass claim, but my role was disbelieved because of balance and such.
it kinda disproves the complexity aspect a little though. If someone had just claimed 'billy bunroe, doc', with no additional details, they would have been lynched straightaway, after the wifom discussions. A similar thing happened in higher mathmatics mafia, where the roles were all so complicated that the scum had to go with simple claims.

Return to “Mafia Discussion”