Mini 422 - Paranoia Mafia - Game Over
-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
Way to try to be on both wagons. I'm getting happier with my Mojo vote.Mojo wrote: Well, I am a happiness officer. So if it makes you happy...
Vote: Playswithsquirrels
Got anything to say for yourself Squirrels?
Stark, are you nervous because you're late for your Secret Society meeting?
Are you serious?Mojo wrote: PWS, your answer does not compute.
Are you a mutant? If so, are you registered?
Are you a member of a secret society?
Do you wear fur hats during night cycles?
What is your clearance level?
Appearantly you ARE serious.Mojo wrote: PWS, you chose to ignore all my questions (post 75). Those were serious questions (except maybe the third one) and I expect serious answers.
What's your reason for that FOS?Sarcastro wrote: What's a squirrel? FoS: Cogito Ergo Sum-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
Ok, I'm satisfied with how you handle my accusations, soMojo wrote: Other than the fact that my question about stark's nervousness is a joke taken from the Pen&Paper Paranoia, I didn't express any desire to join the stark wagon.
I didn't vote him, I didn't FOS him and I made no remark about me being suspicious of him.
The fact that you use such a ridiculous accusation in order to push for a wagon on me makes me very suspicious of you.unvote Mojo. The unvote has nothing to do with you expressing suspicousness of me, though.
I haven't said that. I asked you for the reason for the FOS. Are you implying that squirrels are something you shouldn't have knowledge of?Sarcastro wrote: I believe my reason is right there. Are you implying you know what a squirrel is? FoS: dahen-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
Sarcastro - You are picking up my track against Mojo, but I just left it you see. I might get back to it, but I think he handled the pressure quite well. However, we need to here from the inactive players like MM. Where is he?
Team leader, please request a prod on MM.
Friend computer, your previous vote count made me so happy. Can we have another?-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
Ok. Reread as promised.
I'll type as I read:
p1
nothing of interest
p2
Barromanstrikes me as a little scummy when over-explaining his vote on CES and even calling it stupid.
p3
[/i]PWS defends[/i] himself weirdly to what seems like a normal D1-wagon by CES+Sarc. He seems to actually suggest that they are both scums (or I am missing some irony).
starkpoints out that M4yhem is defending PWS. This could be to later have a reason for a vote.
Stevievotes Stark for the above. Stark replies he is not nervous.
p4
Mojoasks PWS for lots of role info.
Barromancontinues to question M4yhem votes but says nothing constructive himself. Scum defending townie seems possible.
SarcFOSes Mojo, but later admits it was without much of a reason.
Steviedefends PWS. Says he looks bad but prefers other lynch.
Sarctakes the opportunity to FOS Stevie based on the above.
PWSrefuses to claim (with added "at this time")
Starkadmits lurking.
p5
Barromancontinues his hunt for explanations. His own explanation isn't much, though.
dahen(me)with his first post accuses Mojo. So far in the re-read I wonder why I didn't attack Barroman or Sarc instead.
To be continued-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
p6
M4yhemsuspects me, Barroman and Stark. Asks CES to vote Stark.
CESmoves his vote to Stark per Myhem's request.
DHsays nothing of where he stands.
Barromanchanges his vote to M4yhem because he doesn't like his attitude.
M4yhemnow moves his vote to me for no new reason. And no reason why he unvotes Stark.
Barromannow questions M4yhem's reason for voting me.
Mazsays is a scum-tell and votes M4yhem for that.
At this point I think Barroman makes his life very easy by just asking for explanations all the time. However, I'm getting a town vibe from him (not for defending me, though). At this point, Sarc, MM or Stark seems like good choices.-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
You don't seem to have read the introduction to my posts.Sarcastro wrote: FoS: dahen
How on earth do you figure that MM, Stark and I are good lynches? I don't see any explanation, just a summary of what's happened so far.
Also, how would you like to put your money where your mouth is and actually vote for someone? I would suggest Stevie, seeing as how he's scum, but M4yhem seems to be a popular choice among those who prefer to lynch pro-town players.
I said that I wrote my thoughts as I read page by page. I still haven't come to the last pages, so why would I NOW vote someone that was a suspect on page 6?
I will continue my analysis. Then I will draw conclusions. Then I will vote. Until then you are free to discuss my thoughts or ignore them, whatever makes you happy.-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
Time to continue my analysis:
p7
Mayhemexplains that from the source material he thought that all mutants were anti-computer and thus bad guys.
Mojosteps in and says that only registered mutants are non-threats to computer. He also says he is happy with his vote on PWS.
Barromanvotes Mayhem for attitude.
Mayhemvotes Dahen for attempt to mastermind.
MMsays not every PC is a mutant, but that every PC is a SS-member.
Mayhemsays that SS-members are traitors and that traitors are anti-town.
Barromanquestions Mayhem's vote on Dahen.
Diamondhawksees bastard modding as possible.
Sarcastroaccuses Mojo for meaningless PWS vote.
starksays it's obvious that the pro-computer agents are mafia.
MMvotes Mayhem for rolling eyes.
We have quite a lot of setup speculation here to look at.
Mayhem says SS-members are traitors.
Mayhem says Traitors are anti-town.
stark says that Pro-computer agents are anti-town.
DiamondHawk believes the Communists are mafia.
Coron says that you can (and are) treasonous without being anti-computer and I assume he means anti-town.-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
p8
Sarcdoesn't want to talk game mechanics until later for fear of helping scum in fake-claiming. Votes Mojo for wanting too much info.
Barromandoesn't like MM's rollseye-vote on Mayhem
Mayhemfoses Stark for thinking pro-computers are scum.
MMsays nobody seems scummy.
Diamondhawkdefends dahen and suspects Mayhem a little. Also thinks it's too early to speculate on setup.
Sarcastro strikes me as a good player. He points out pro-town stuff in a manner I attempt as town just as well as scum. The choice of conclusions drawn from it is what's interesting. His vote on Mojo is consistent with the vote-those-who-speculate-too-much-too-early-strategy. I still thinks Sarcastro has voted a lot based on templates like this. I'll continue to watch his moves.
I don't care about Mayhem's roll-smiley, but I do care about his defense that "you can't seriously use it as evidence". The thing is that you can't use anything as evidence. The fact that you seem to think in terms of evidence when at this point everything is hunches and interpretations is at least somewhat scummy to me.-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
p9
Mayhemclarifies his vote on me and Barrowman and also says he don't think Mojo is scum because of asking stupid questions.
Mojoaccuses Mayhem for being to certain Mojo is town.
CESFoses Mayhem for trivializing scum tells.
PWSjumps in to vote Stark for saying nothing.
Actually, Mayhem votes me for capitilizing in a similar way that I accuse Sarcastro of doing. I see that as pro-town, but I don't like how he has stuck with that. There's plenty more happening to consider. Also, I also agree with him suspecting Barrowman for looking for reasons, but as I said a couple of pages back, I got a pro-town vibe from Barrowman that I will stick with.
I will, however, defend Mayhem from Mojo's accusation that he is too certain that Mojo is town. That's not how I read his post (#204). I read it as he don't think Mojo's behaviour suggest that he is scum, and that he therefore is neutral rather than town. This makes Mojo's and Sarcastro's jump on Mayhem look bad. But I could be wrong.
I don't understand how PWS can be so inactive as he is and then in #211 accuse Stark for merely saying he is there. There is a lot more interesting stuff going on, and that even if you only look at Stark.-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
Continuing, since I want this written down before nightfall:
p10
Mayhemvotes Stevie for killing for smile.
Then NOTHING happens for a long time. This is important. We don't know today why, but I think we will know more later in the game. If Mayhem is town I think most scum are already on his wagon at this point. If Mayhem is scum, then scum might be waiting for somebody else to accuse. Anybody who suddenly would start to look elsewhere would be a suspect later on.
Sarcastrostates Mojo+Stevie as scum pair.
Barromanalso analyses the stall and votes Stevie to test him.
CESsilently votes Mayhem
dahenposts analyses
p11
Sarcastrofoses dahen for lack of conclusions (but they are coming)
Seferreplaces Mayhem and states that he didn't like Mayhem's play style. He votes Mojo for using a fact in a wrong way.
Stevieunvotes Sefer because he likes the guy and want him around.
Mojois replaced by TCS, who votes Sefer for the setup discussion earlier.
Sarcastrois worried by Sefer dying as town but asks him to claim.
Seferclaims to not be a member of a SS.
TCSwants claims from SS members.
TCSwants Sarcastro to answer why Sefer is town and Stevie scum.
I think Sefer's vote on Mojo has a valid reason. The TCS vote on Sefer is also valid and the SS member thing could be worth something (by saying this I think you can infer that I'm a SS member). If we look at the stall, then Sefer is a good lynch since it will give us info.-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
p12
Sarcdoesn't want to publish case against Stevie but he says it's pretty good. I would like to hear it again or get a reference to an old post with the good case.
Sefervotes Stevie to get a lynch before dead-line.
TCSis happy with his vote on Sefer.
dahencontinues with analyses
Sarcastrosays dahen's analyses are interesting but doesn't say what he finds interesting.
It's here 3-3 between Sefer and Stevie
Seferuses machine empathy and double votes Stevie. (4-3)
MMunvotes Sefer.
Sarcastrowants a claim from Stevie.
Stevierefuses to claim.
I like to speculate on setups even though it sometimes bites me. I think double voters are normally town, which means that this speaks in Sefer's favor.
Assuming Sefer is town and scum didn't add to his wagon during the stall (meaning scum are potentially on wagon) the logical choice is between those on the wagon at the stall, which are:
stark, Barroman, MM, Stevie, TCS
CESlater joined the wagon.
starkunvoted without explanation.
I don't wantstarkto be forgotten.
I thinkBarromanis town.
MMhas barely posted at all.
CEShas posted a little more, but nothing substancial.
Steviehas not said much other than his theory against Mayhem/Sefer.
Stevie:I'd like to know what your current view on Sefer is and who you think should be lynched.
TCS/Mayhemhas interacted more with people and is a better lynch if we'd like information.
TCS:Same question to you as to Stevie.-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
There is an important difference between the two dead guys:
Stevie was a Communist and enemy to the Computer
Sefer was an enemy to the Computer.
Since the Computer is paranoid, it probably thinks everyone is a threat to the computer upon death investigation. However, only Communists are the real threat (at least that's how I interpret the material), which means that we should try to get rid of communists. That also means that Stevie was a real bad guy and Sefer a good guy, which seems logical.-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
TCS: You state two scenarios.
1. Communists are scum. You are town. Town should not lynch you.
2. Pro-computers are scum. You are scum. Town should lynch you.
Of course you are correct that town should lynch you in case two. But the problem is that you would be playing against your own win condition by supporting it. Scum can benefit from helping town and therefore getting trusted, but in this case you would be dead, and the trust would be wasted as soon as town saw you were scum.
This means that if you really think that 2 is a possibility, then you are playing really bad as scum. I don't think so, which means I think that you are probably very certain that number 1 is correct.
One reason that you can be sure of number 1 is if you are a communist and scum yourself. There is something that's not right about you.-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
PWS: Can you elaborate a little more on your reason for voting Sarc at this point?
You say that TCS is town if commies are scum. Then you say that you don't buy that just the communists are scum. I guess the use of the word "just" means that you DO believe that commies are scum, but that there might be other scum as well. Then I don't see why TCS couldn't be such a scum.
There is something wrong with your reasoning. Please explain to me if I have understood you incorrectly.-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
-
-
dahen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 646
- Joined: June 13, 2006
- Location: Linkoping, Sweden
Oh, I'm looking forward to the setup and results.
dahen PM wrote:Little does The Computer know that you are one of the members of the Sierra Club secret society
By being replaced, didn't I achieve the mission of escaping forever?Wiki wrote: Sierra Club (referred to as Seal Club in some editions): The computer restricts leaving Alpha Complex to green clearance and above, and then only for good reasons. So, aside from Troubleshooters who may be sent into the great outdoors, almost no one in Alpha Complex has seen so much as a blade of grass. This great mystique has led to the formation of the Sierra Club, devoted to sneaking out. Some want to escape forever, others try to bring the wonders of nature to the less fortunate inside.
Ok, maybe not.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.