Mini 452 NBA All-Stars Mafia-Game Over!

[A Papaya]

What's up people?

/Confirmed

[A Papaya]

I'll kick this off.

Random

Vote: McStab

[A Papaya]

Anybody got, uh, anything to say? XD

Not really.

OMG I SAID SOMETHING

[A Papaya]

Anybody got, uh, anything to say? XD

Not really.

OMG I SAID SOMETHING

Extremely funny, oh well... this starts off chat and finds mafia

I'll start it, ehh who

is

townie? Be honest......

So you're saying that you aren't?

[A Papaya]

Anybody got, uh, anything to say? XD

Not really.

OMG I SAID SOMETHING

Extremely funny, oh well... this starts off chat and finds mafia

I'll start it, ehh who

is

townie? Be honest......

So you're saying that you aren't?

Yes, I am a townie.... It's just starting the conv, and don't quote this, too many quotes

Yes, we know it was starting the conv, I got a half-sarcastic feeling from Papaya's post

So, our first implied roleclaim; vanilla townie?

And, finally, don't qu... oh, nevermind.

Bah, there's no way to prove that you're a vanilla townie through a role claim. So I don't know why NL tried.

[A Papaya]

There's always one....
I'm not going to say anything important, I just want to start off a new post quote link, the other one is too long...

Always one what? Vanilla Townie? Not ALWAYS...

[A Papaya]

No, I think he was making a smart-arse comment about us being childish

In which case he should of said 'There's always

two

'

Meh, well, in this game, it seems the only way to get a discussion going is to act childish...so it isn't that bad of a thing. Anyway, it's childish to vote for someone because they FoSed you in another game, which is why NL voted for me.

[A Papaya]

Also, NL, I recall you saying a post ago "just to start off a new POST QUOTE LINK"...

[A Papaya]

Wow...how little RAM do you have on your computer?

[A Papaya]

Who cares about the difference of the post count? Why are you in such a hurry to lynch?

[A Papaya]

Though I have seen you do that in another game so it could just be your playstyle.

[A Papaya]

Meh. I'll be back on tomorrow. See you guys for today.

[A Papaya]

The only reason I haven't voted NL yet is that he's always extremely scummy...and that's why I think he just sucks at Mafia. Which is also a good reason to lynch someone.

Vote: N-L

[A Papaya]

Yeah but I've been playing Mafia all over the web before I joined scum. It's not your join date that matter, it's your experience. Anyway, I do think that you've been acting scummy all game.

[A Papaya]

Unvote: N-L

He's new. He just PMed me about how he didn't think I was scum, which isn't allowed. And that means his new, not awesome. Don't lynch him.

Either that or he's like the awesomest person ever, which in that case we're screwed anyhow.

[A Papaya]

Well, since right now we don't have anything to go on, what with us not knowing who Nekka-Lucifer was, I'm going to

vote: mlaker

. I have two reasons for doing so:

1) Thok pretty much gave him a free pass to lurk by not requiring confirmation from him.
2) mlaker = Los Angeles Lakers = Kobe Bryant = wanted Shaq dead.

That is good logic, which means that the chance that Kobe's role is scum just went up 40%. Now to figure out who Kobe is...(or Who is Kobe)

Hmm, that's cool. So Kobe is probably Mafia...nicely done.

[A Papaya]

I have no idea who to vote for, no one sees that scummy. So I'm going to watch the discussion develop...but IH does seem the must scummy to me, so far.

[A Papaya]

Because I suck at this game. And it seems I have initiated a conversation.

[A Papaya]

I said no one seems "that scummy". That means that no one seems

very

scummy, but you still seem the scummiest. No contradictions there.

[A Papaya]

I'll explain my logic now, Fletcher.

This is my opinion.
Nekka Lucifer is an idiot, IMO. He doesn't help at all, and in every other game he is in, I get the impression that he is scum. He just isn't that good at mafia. Therefore, it's most likely he'll end up doing something stupid, even as a townie, and we'll waste a lynch later in the game, when it matters more, on him. That's why I wanted him out of the way now.

[A Papaya]

Papaya! When the HELL did you get the right to go round calling people idiots? The only grounds for that should be for flaming etc, not for 'playing badly'! Seriously, apologize; you don't even know who he is and you called him an idiot.

It's my opinion, which I think can be validly expressed.

@xyzzy: IMO, he's the best lynch we've got today.

[A Papaya]

@No Lynch:

It's a stupid idea. Because if we don't lynch anyone at all today, we're going to be in the same spot as we were, minus players from nightkills. It's lose-lose.

FOS: Everyone who voted No Lynch

[A Papaya]

What the hell? No Lynch buys us time? No it doesn't...scum will still NK. So we lose no matter what if we don't lynch...but if we lynch, we have an ok chance of success.

[A Papaya]

Well I did finally decide that NL probably wasn't scum, and didn't end up lynching him.

Possible backseat driving; a scum tell. Suspects IH but dosen't vote, might be useful later.

What? Umm...I suspected him, but not enough to vote. I forgot to FoS. How is that scummy?

Also, about my logic on lynching NL for being, IMO, a bad player: He'll probably become a liability later in the game, bandwagoning with whoever can protect him and voting randomly. Which can really mess up a game.

Also, Xdaamno, could we know see an analysis of Fletcher?

[A Papaya]

What? Umm...I suspected him, but not enough to vote. I forgot to FoS. How is that scummy?

Forgetting to FoS isn't scummy, but remember: we don't know that you forgot. Your alibi is only as good as your credibility.

I guess that's true. Well, nothing I can do about it now.

[A Papaya]

Sorry for being so inactive, I just generally don't post much day one, there's only minor missteps by the scum and/or townies, suspicions and random votes. Day two is much more interesting, and you can catch scum alot better, because who they kill in the night and who is lynched day one helps determine who's scum. I try to stay out of Day 1 because to me it's just a chance for a townie to be lynched quickly by a minor misstep. Now if something large happens, such as someone does a major scum tell, then I can see voting there, but until there's some evidence involving who got killed/lynched, I'm not really too active. I check the thread, I just don't see much to say.

What the hell?

Unvote (if voting); Vote: McStab

[A Papaya]

People are saying that we can vote No Lynch because this wasn't a normal D1.

That's wrong. I'm 90% sure that NL was town, that's why I unvoted him. Therefore, it's even more important to hit scum today.

If we miss scum today, the ration will be, after tonights NK:
7 Town
3 Scum
-----With an SK
5 Town
3 Scum
1 SK
-----Therefore, we need to lynch someone today.

Who? I would like everyone to come forward with whom they think is today's lynch, if No Lynch isn't a possibility. Right now, I'm pretty happy with my vote on McStab, pretty much for saying that D1 doesn't matter. That's really, really, anti-town.

[A Papaya]

I'm 90% sure that NL was town

I thought you were saying he was scum before? I'm sure you said he was scum after he got modkilled at some point, so the circumstances are the same.

I'll have to re-read for that one.

No, I said that he was scummy early on but revised my thoughts when he PMed me. Then I thought he was just stupid.

[A Papaya]

And Town.

Yes, just because he PMed me. Remember, everyone at first thought he was scummy for his playstyle. When he PMed me, I realized that his playstyle was just stupid, not scummy.

Also, I need to be replaced by sunday. Thanks.