Open 23 - Masons and Monks (GAME OVER) - before 458

Stewie · Post Post #9 (isolation #0) » Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:12 am

Vote: LSU Tiger Josh

Longest name.

PS: you'd figure one would keep oneself out of the random draw...

Stewie · Post Post #16 (isolation #1) » Fri Jun 08, 2007 4:59 pm

I think it's wrong what police do to wealthy black men.

Stewie · Post Post #38 (isolation #2) » Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:46 pm

dylan41985 wrote:This is turning out to be a very interesting vote! I could switch my vote to Adel, but I need some convincing.

This strikes me as suspicious. Non-committal, in a way. In addition, Adel really didn't do anything at all suspicious. Why would you want to get convinced to vote for him?

Stewie · Post Post #58 (isolation #3) » Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:52 am

J-man wrote:so what we going to kill the inactive now adel?

Vote:Adel

Explain?

MOD:

I am not voting myself. I'm voting tiger.

Stewie · Post Post #73 (isolation #4) » Sat Jun 16, 2007 6:18 am

How so? I'm not really seeing it.

Stewie · Post Post #89 (isolation #5) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:36 am

Unvote; vote: J-man

That's four out of six, so careful.

Stewie · Post Post #131 (isolation #6) » Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:45 am

dylan41985 wrote:I could have guessed that Adel would be killed next by the evils of the town, but wow - he had no chance.

I'm going to be gone all of next week and I don't know how much I'll be able to post.

I'm highly suspicious of Sir Tornado and Stewie though...

Why's that?

Stewie · Post Post #145 (isolation #7) » Tue Jun 26, 2007 4:14 pm

To have "more" of something, don't you need some of it to begin with?

Stewie · Post Post #150 (isolation #8) » Thu Jun 28, 2007 4:54 am

vote: ojpower

We are having trouble getting the game going, and someone lurking like that doesn't help.

Stewie · Post Post #192 (isolation #9) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:38 pm

JDodge wrote:
Sir Tornado wrote:The Greg, had Sweenytodd forced a no-lynch, the game would have been draged to a deadline, because the wolves would not have voted for a no-lynch. We had voted LSU at the very start of the day, so at deadline, being the oldest last vote, LSU would have been eliminated. There would not have been any NKs at night because of the immunity to Night kills. So, the next day, you would have 2 werewolves, 1 mafia and 1 mason. A WW win was inevitable unless Sweenytodd voted for a werewolf lynch.
Actually, the werewolves would've won anyways.

Kill Sweeny (no immunity) and then you have a 2-1 majority over the other scumgroup going into the next day.

Huh? There were no cross kills yet, so if there was no lynch then they would have targeted each other, you'd be back with 5 people the next day, another no lynch, and then the crosskilling would begin.

Stewie · Post Post #195 (isolation #10) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 10:52 am

Sir Tornado wrote:But, why would the scum vote for a no lynch?

They wouldn't, but the vote would be tied 2-2, with three to lynch. If a deadline comes into effect, then half the votes are needed... but since it's 2-2, there's two people, scum, who have enough for a lynch. I'm not sure if that would get both lynched, or neither, but there's really no reason to give the lynch to one team over the other.

Stewie · Post Post #199 (isolation #11) » Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 am

Not to mention it's a rather arbitrary way of choosing the winner.