Open 23 - Masons and Monks (GAME OVER) - before 458

[Adel]

Original Roll String: 1d10

1 10-Sided Dice: (7) = 7

[Adel]

er...

vote:Adel

damnit.

[Adel]

Fos: LSU Tiger Josh, Sweenytodd and dylan41985

for forming a racist posse to frame and lynch a beautiful black man.

vote: now a ranger

for not having a random vote yet.

[Adel]

It is necessary for players to unvote before switching their votes.

I stand corrected. Thanks for catching that for me.

unvote: Adel Vote now a ranger

[Adel]

Aren't you supposed to be

NO ACCESS

right now?

[Adel]

This is turning out to be a very interesting vote! I could switch my vote to Adel, but I need some convincing.

unvote:now a ranger vote:dylan41985

[Adel]

Struck this girl like he was just testing the waters. No original opinion, no content, a post for posts sake. Not even a vote on record that could be useful for later analysis. No follow up. Scummiest action so far, in my opinion. Scum trying to find a place in the herd. Has my vote.

A shame, I was hoping my vote would convince him to vote for me, but I think the rest of y'all's votes have prevented that.

[Adel]

For the record, I used a random number generator, and

my

number came up. If I wasn't going to count my name I would've used a smaller spread of numbers, specifically 1d9 rather than 1d10. Next time I'll know better. Given my error (using 1d10) I made the more honest choice.

I think it is worth noticing who overreacted to it.

[Adel]

unvote:dylan41985 vote:now a ranger

[Adel]

You protest too much, hypocrite.

[Adel]

While I feel honored that you type my name out in each of your posts, I am afraid I do not understand your last comment. Care to explain?

[Adel]

[quote="J-man"

Vote:Adel

[/quote]
Oh, you forgot to unvote first, that is why your vote didn't appear in the votecount. I was confused for a minute.

[Adel]

Vote:Adel

Oh, you forgot to unvote first, that is why your vote didn't appear in the votecount. I was confused for a minute.

^that I was I meant a couple of posts ago, not a self vote.
Dang typos, I need to hit the preview button more often.

[Adel]

Sorry about that, I was waiting for NAR to squirm a little more. That is ther ifrst time I ever has to be prodded.

[Adel]

Huh. Why the unvote? I don't think there was any danger of him being hammered.

[Adel]

That is an amazing clear argument. I wasn't even considering him seriously, now you have me convinced.

unvote: NAR, Vote:J-Man

[Adel]

Don't forget he also metagames which is why I voted for him originally.

J-man or Sweenytodd?

[Adel]

FOS: NAR for putting J-man at -1 so quietly


unvote:J-man

Because I feel better at lynch -2. We don't have nearly enough information on anyone for me to feel like this is anything other than a potential quicklynch. Not pro-town.

At least let J-man make a single post before putting him at -1, and if you do put a freaking warning up.

[Adel]

EBWOP:

FOS: dylan41985 for putting J-man at -1 so quietly

Apologies to NAR.

[Adel]

It is so weird that you not only beat me to the post, but you called the FOS,

and

I screwed up Dylan's name and put your's in instead. Strange.

[Adel]

J-man: the little show you just put on isn't convincing, or very distracting.

*shrug*

vote:J-man

I think you are the one that needs to do some explaining. If other players are voting in a pattern that fits the profile of scum attempting to join bandwagons without attracting attention, the onus is upon

you

to prove it. Or try providing a decent case in your own defense.

Until you do I am perfectly happy seeing you at

-1 to lynch

[Adel]

now i can see that in this game people have become scared of -1 aswell... why? I would like somone to explain to me why -1 is soo taboo, and yes the -1 lynch is a tightrope to walk and it does apply a whole new type of pressure then even -2 so i think we need to understand this for other games we play, if we learn this early bandwagons can draw that much more content, there are two things that go along with a -1 tho first a warning it is

YOUR

( the voter) responsibility to ensure that everyone is sufficently warned that to vote is to hammer, very very dangerous early game.

{snip}

i would like you to explain why me changing my vote several times is such a scummy thing to to and convinced? pah that post merited no such esteem, all you have to do is look at the voting patterns of the general pop. and you find that my voting isn't unusual in the slightest.

Are the previous question you refer to buried somewhere in these paragraphs?

Try asking me an explicit question if you want a response from me.

Here is one for you: You stated that the town needs a leader, who do you think that leader should be?

[Adel]

in a seperate point i think we need to deal with adel, (yes im about to metagame) this game is an oddity for him imo, his first -1 lynch vote there is not a mention about im at -1 i find that odd coming from Adel then he unvotes... indescition??

The last time I voted for you was the first time I voted you to -1 to lynch, and I even bolded that you were -1 to lynch.

Does "indescition" = "indecision" or "indiscretion"

It is pretty clear that I unvoted you because down from -1 because dylan's vote was so suspect. I voted you back up to -1 because I feel it is probable enough that you are scum to warrant it.

Here is me meta-gaming you: J-man is capable of typing out a coherent post, yet he is choosing not to. Is appearing incompetent and confused part of his defense? It is possible. The repeated finger pointing and votes directed at me are interesting, when you aren't jumping on another's bandwagon you are trying to get one started on me. You've voted "Adel" three times in five pages. Why should anyone think your grudge against me has anything to do with my alignment in this game? I read your case against me and I see

@#!$!@%@!%$ vote for Adel because I do not like her #@!%#@#$@^%#@

...not very convincing.

[Adel]

ok i guess your right i haven't asked you any specific questions but then again i never expected to have to pull teeth either >.<

here are a couple questions for you:
1. Are you mafia? (if no continue)

i'll take the syntax of that question to mean that you are a werewolf.

Major Scum Tell

and no, I am not mafia.

2. Could you explain why Sweenytodds post is convincing?

He pointed out you voting pattern, and it that matches what I expect the active scum player to do.

3. Why did you not Alert that i was -1 the first time you did?

I put it in bold. That is the warning.

4. Who do you think the town leader should be?
(well my answer to this is i hope to god it doesn't become you, i don't trust you any father then i can throw you[@adel])

No-one independent thought is the best. The only people who can be 100% confident of another alignment are the mafia, and you and the other werewolf.

5. what do you think of Dylan's erratic posting and one liners?

Horrible play. Earned my vote already. There is a good chance that he is just a newbie who isn't very good at banging at the keyboard yet. I would like to see more pressure on him, after you are lynched. There is a chance that he is a mason or a monk, and I would like to get the good lynch out of the way before we risk outing any more power roles.

there i made it easy for you now ignore these and i will only have 1 conclusion to draw.

Now that I've answered them I expect you'll collect your next vote pretty soon.

[Adel]

what am I supposed to wait for you to say "I'm a werewolf"? Voting patterns and little slips are all we ever have to go off of day 1. I missed that you are at -2, but I'm very convinced of your guilt. Go ahead & meta-game me on this, it is very unusual thing for me to do, but I am sold thanks to your questions so I am pushing for an early lynch.

Until you do I am perfectly happy seeing you at

-1 to lynch

That is the warning in bold I was referring to. Did you miss it or are you trying to sow more confusion as a defense?

[Adel]

Bah! I'm dead. I'm

really

dead. gah.

[Adel]

Guardian you killed me the moment you replaced in? I thought we were friends!