Another Mafia Game Needlessly Ruined: Please Read.

JordanA24 · Post Post #11 (isolation #0) » Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:06 am

This would explain why a lot of people have been ripping the hell out of Meta recently.

Unfortuantly, this is an inevitable side effect of the site becoming more popular, I think there is only one way of combating this, which is permaban, I really hope we don't get many idiots who ruin the games just for the hell of it and don't care about getting banned.

I like your idea SSF, but sadly I don't think it would be enough.

JordanA24 · Post Post #58 (isolation #1) » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:00 am

Maz Medias wrote:Let me counter exemplify:
If Meta had been GF and fingered a townie and a scum, and you, as cop, investigate the one that was a townie, what is your reaction then? If he's fingered two townies, he's gotten you to waste two investigations. It's not an altogether useless play.

Finally, I want to point out that in the other two instances, PMs were posted. Meta did not post a PM, or break
any rules whatsoever
.

EDIT: The fact that the town set out the correct play that you provided simply means that the game could have wrapped up and Meta's behavior held at fault for the scum loss.

This is completely irrelevent Maz, in this case, Meta fingered his actual scumbuddies, the cop would have investigated one of them, post it in thread, game over.

JordanA24 · Post Post #61 (isolation #2) » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:10 am

I'll say this one more time, Katy's game had a cop that was still alive, there probs wasn't a scum roleblocker, and if there was, they didn't know who the cop was. Katy did the only possible thing, which was abandon the game, it doesn't matter how excellent the scum were, there was no way of salvaging the game.

Mods don't neccessarily have to pounce on unorthodox play, you're right on that count, but you're very wrong by saying Katy didn't do the right thing.

JordanA24 · Post Post #173 (isolation #3) » Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:06 pm

Quagmire wrote:glork talks a lot and says absolutely nothing --

maz is right and everyone else is wrong --

finally, jesus christ, people -- it's a fucking game. get over yourselves. metatron should not have to apologize, hurrikaty should quit bitching and acting like she's "tough" and "hard nosed", and the rest of you should quit debating over whether or not this guy should be banned

because he shouldn't

because you guys need to quit being little girls

Oh yes, a fucking game that many people put lots of effort into to have someone ruin it over a hissy fit. Yep, Katy should apologise immediatly to the person who ruined her game, that she designed, got back running after a crash, and put more effort than anyone else did. Katy has no right to feel angry for that doesn't she.

Get real.

JordanA24 · Post Post #182 (isolation #4) » Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:02 am

Quagmire wrote:Also you directly turn your discussion from "people trying to have fun" to "look at all of the work put into this game", which makes absolutely no sense

Er, yes it does, people put work into a game SO they can have fun with it, you make no sense.

JordanA24 · Post Post #190 (isolation #5) » Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:34 am

Quagmire wrote:
JordanA24 wrote:
Quagmire wrote:Also you directly turn your discussion from "people trying to have fun" to "look at all of the work put into this game", which makes absolutely no sense
Er, yes it does, people put work into a game SO they can have fun with it, you make no sense.
yeah, but when you slave over the game (which apparently hurri katy has -- there's no way that you slave over a game for three months) that much, how can it possibly be rewarding? everyone's going to forget the game you've created in two weeks.

especially when you
know
that this might happen

Quag PLEASE for the sake of humanity, DO NOT BREED. Seriously, you're arguments are so mindbogglingly stupid, I'm not even going to bother arguing with you anymore:

Someone once wrote: Don't bother arguing with an idiot, they'll drag you down to their level and win on experience.

JordanA24 · Post Post #191 (isolation #6) » Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:35 am

Vote: We ignore any more posts from Quagmire

JordanA24 · Post Post #205 (isolation #7) » Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:33 am

zu_Faul wrote:
JordanA24 wrote:
Vote: We ignore any more posts from Quagmire
Right, if someone disagrees with you, just ignore them and pretend to live your on your happy pink farm with happy pink ponies and such.

It's not that he disagree's with me, it's the fact he's being such a buffoon about it.

JordanA24 · Post Post #237 (isolation #8) » Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:03 pm

Quagmire wrote:
whoever the weird guy is with the m as an avatar wrote:It's not that he disagree's with me, it's the fact he's being such a buffoon about it.
buffoon about what? also, "disagree's"

Webster's Pocket Dictionary wrote:
Buf-foon'
: A clown or jester; a fool, jerk -
Buff-oon'er-y

n
-
Buff-oon'ish

adj.

Though these would fit nicely as well:

Webster's Pocket Dictionary wrote:
Fool

n.
One lacking common sense; A silly person -
vi.
To act silly. -
vt.
To mislead or cheat
-
Fool'ish

adj.

-Fool'ish-ly

adv.
-
Fool'ish-ness

n.

Webster's Pocket Dictionary wrote:
Id'i-ot

n.
One who is foolish or stupid; Formerly a classification for mental retardation, now considered offensive in that context.
Id-i-ot'ic

adj.
Foolish or stupid.

Webster's Pocket Dictionary wrote:
Mo'ron

n.
Someone regarded as stupid or very foolish.
-Mor-on'ic

adj.

-Mor-on'i-cal-ly

adv.

Webster's Pocket Dictionary wrote:
Stu'pid

adj.
Lacking intelligence; dull witted; tiresome or annoying
- Stup-id'i-ty, Stu'pid-ness
n.

-Stu'pid-ly
adv.

Get it?

Oh, and that "m" that you see as my avatar is not an m. It is the glyph for my star sign.

JordanA24 · Post Post #243 (isolation #9) » Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:32 am

Quagmire wrote:
JordanA24 wrote:
Quagmire wrote:
whoever the weird guy is with the m as an avatar wrote:It's not that he disagree's with me, it's the fact he's being such a buffoon about it.
buffoon about what? also, "disagree's"

Webster's Pocket Dictionary wrote:
Buf-foon'
: A clown or jester; a fool, jerk -
Buff-oon'er-y

n
-
Buff-oon'ish

adj.
Though these would fit nicely as well:

Webster's Pocket Dictionary wrote:
Fool

n.
One lacking common sense; A silly person -
vi.
To act silly. -
vt.
To mislead or cheat
-
Fool'ish

adj.

-Fool'ish-ly

adv.
-
Fool'ish-ness

n.

Webster's Pocket Dictionary wrote:
Id'i-ot

n.
One who is foolish or stupid; Formerly a classification for mental retardation, now considered offensive in that context.
Id-i-ot'ic

adj.
Foolish or stupid.

Webster's Pocket Dictionary wrote:
Mo'ron

n.
Someone regarded as stupid or very foolish.
-Mor-on'ic

adj.

-Mor-on'i-cal-ly

adv.

Webster's Pocket Dictionary wrote:
Stu'pid

adj.
Lacking intelligence; dull witted; tiresome or annoying
- Stup-id'i-ty, Stu'pid-ness
n.

-Stu'pid-ly
adv.
Get it?

Oh, and that "m" that you see as my avatar is not an m. It is the glyph for my star sign.

dictionary.com wrote:
tongue-in-cheek

adjective

1. cleverly amusing in tone; "a bantering tone"; "facetious remarks"; "tongue-in-cheek advice" [syn: bantering]

adverb

1. in a bantering fashion; "he spoke to her banteringly" [syn: banteringly]
2. not seriously; "I meant it facetiously" [syn: facetiously]
also, pooky's right that you're doing nothing but feeding the troll. you should shush while you're ahead (behind)

Haha, you called yourself a troll.

How on Earth am I behind? Most of the thread agrees with me, and think you're an idiot.

JordanA24 · Post Post #248 (isolation #10) » Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:41 am

mneme wrote:Jordan and Quag are both being extremely trollish.

Yeah, sorry about that, forgotten about the original subject. But stupidity like Quag's is pretty hard to ignore. But since I'm ahead (Oh yes I am Quag), I'll quit.