NY 193 : Werewolf Mania (GAME OVER- TOWN WIN)
-
-
JarJarDrinks
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 26, Almost50 wrote:VOTE: BlackStar
He came close to beating the town in our most recent game. If he's a WW he knows how hide it well.In post 27, SilverWolf wrote:VOTE: ika
While I agree JarJar sucks as a character, getting ika sorted is priority for me.
Either of these somewhat serious? They don't feel too RVS-y to me.-
-
JarJarDrinks
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Slight town points for Xkfyu. I like how he responded to Robster trying to get a wagon on me. Scum might worry about how a pile on might look @ this point. He just went "fuck it" and threw a vote down.
Then I don't really like how in the next few posts bebop and bluerose kind of ignore it and try to keep RVS going a bit longer. Bluerose looks a little worse cause bebop @ least acknowledged my wagon.
VOTE: TheBlueRose-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 53, TheBlueRose wrote:Hadn't given it much though due to leaving for a prior engagement that evening. Other then the ones you have already stated, what is your opinion on everyone else that is both on and off your wagon?
Nobody on it seems too scummy to me. But if scum is on my wagon, I'd guess IAI. Just cause his vote on me seemed very non-confrontational. Robster and Snarks are trying to ruffle some feathers.
But this is another post of yours I don't like very much and it looks like fake-scumhunting to me.
"what is your opinion on everyone else that is both on and off your wagon?" is such a garbage question this early into the game.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 58, Almost50 wrote:I -of course- haven't yet formed an opinion on anyone. However,those who played with me before will know my golden rule: When in doubt; vote an inactive. We have 2 players who have yet to sign-in. Scum tend to this for one of two reasons: 1- wait till the game is progressing well to jump in and blend in with ease, OR 2- They don't like being scum so they opt-out and get replaced. Just saying.
Agree w/ the sentiment but not a fan of the bolded. Reads too much like "Guys, this is totally my meta so don't go reading anything into it."-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 64, Almost50 wrote:@JarJar: How would you have phrased it?? And why would you not read anything into it? And if you ignore the bolded, what WOULD you have read into it?
"My golden rule is:" <---- If it was worded like that, I wouldn't have raised my eyebrow.
"Policy lynch Lurker" is something could make people scumread you. You saying "those who played with me before will know..." could be a way to cut off that line of thinking before it starts. Basically letting people know that what you're saying isn't alignment indicative.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 68, Nero Cain wrote:In post 55, JarJarDrinks wrote:"what is your opinion on everyone else that is both on and off your wagon?" is such a garbage question this early into the game.
I really don't agree giving that yo have already formed opinions of atleast 2 (or 3 if you count IAI) players.
Right. I formed opinions on TWO or THREE players. He's asking for my opinion on EVERYONE ELSE. How could I possibly have an opinion on that many people?
Like I can understand asking about others ON the wagon. But on and OFF the wagon?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 69, Almost50 wrote:@JarJar: Actually; it IS alignment indicative (albeit a weak tell) especially in my case. If I was scum and knew there to be one of my associates in an inactive spot I would've -at least- waited a bit longer before I pointed it out. But your explanation makes perfect sense too.
Bad Bad post.
First off, telling us that his post IS alignment indicative. You don't get to give yourself townpoints dude.
Second, How in the world can it actually be alignment indicative when we have no idea if the inactives are scum? You seem to KNOW that you should be getting townpoints for recommending a policy lynch on scum.
Third, you say that if you were scum, you would have waited a bit longer. But why? If you were scum, wouldn't it make sense to do it earlier to "warn" ur buddy that he needs to start posting more? What does waiting gain you?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 81, ika wrote:kiser is not reading good to know
Whatcha mean?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 88, BlackStar wrote:It doesn't worry me. Its just annoying because you're so focused on me thatyou won't be paying attention to the actual scum.
He can't BE the actual scum?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 87, Almost50 wrote:@Keyser: A bit of both. I needed a reason to place my RSV, so I checked the players list. I only played before with Snarky, BeBop & BlackStar. Other candidates were Silver(Wolf) & ika (both have wolves in their avatars, so a good reason for anRSVvote). I also considered you, but then I'm not sure if we do have mafia in the game to begin with, so quickly dashed you out.
Seriously though; do I really need to explain my RSV vote at all? I mean, you're the second person to ask about this particular vote. How on Earth could it be a "serious" vote back then based on what has been posted up to that point?
what is this replying to?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 90, JarJarDrinks wrote:what is this replying to?
nvrmnd. It's from 3 keysor posts ago.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 93, BlackStar wrote:In post 89, JarJarDrinks wrote:In post 88, BlackStar wrote:It doesn't worry me. Its just annoying because you're so focused on me thatyou won't be paying attention to the actual scum.
He can't BE the actual scum?
I'm kind of getting that feeling from him. He mentioned that he was "tunneling me" until I proved that I'm town. There's no need to be solely fixated on one person this early in the game, so he might be thinking that he can somehow find one flawed thing that I say and use it to make the town mislynch me. Or maybe he just really is paranoid haha.
Meh, IDK. It's very scumslip-ish to me. You shouldn't be townreading him.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 102, Almost50 wrote:@JarJar: Helping you out?
Are you scum-claiming?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 110, Almost50 wrote:If I was scum I believe I've already made it damn too hard for my scum partners to defend me. I'm the most obvious lynch target by far.
See, if you understand this then you should also understand what this does if you're town.
If you're town, then being the most obvious lynch target gives scum an easy "out". They can just vote for you and there'd be nothing scummy about it.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 145, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Next, almost50. Read his meta before digging too deep into this. I'm not going to attempt to read him day 1 after defending him last game only to find out he was scum, but this sort of play seems normal for him.
Have you seen his town meta?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 151, JarJarDrinks wrote:In post 145, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Next, almost50. Read his meta before digging too deep into this. I'm not going to attempt to read him day 1 after defending him last game only to find out he was scum, but this sort of play seems normal for him.
Have you seen his town meta?
K so the reason I asked this is cause Bebop says "this sort of play seems normal for him". BUT if he's only ever been scum w/ him then he doesn't really know what his "normal" play is.
In fact, he should be super suspicious of him if this is similar to the game where he defended him when he was scum.
I'm normally not a huge meta diver but I decided that it seemed relevant this game and I'd say that this type of play looks alot more like Almost50s scum game then his town game.
Check his ISO from the scum game. In particular:
Spoiler:
and
Spoiler:
looks damn familiar.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 174, Almost50 wrote:You mean you can't even figure THAT out??
No, you have a scum and town game on MS. And nobody asked you for it. Why do you want us to read it?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 180, Almost50 wrote:In post 179, JarJarDrinks wrote:Though I might as well ask: Do u have a scum game on that site u can link to?
Nope. The one you found here was my one and only game I have ever been handed a scum role. All my other games on and off MS I was 100% town aligned.
what was this quote referring to:Well, considering you have never played with scum-me you cannot really say if I act this way when I'm scum. In fact, feel free to check my only game as scum in my entire mafia history (the one modded by flubber) to see if I play this way as scum-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 183, TheBlueRose wrote:I had only asked since you did have some ideas flowing. Sure it was far to early to have reads on everyone, but you stated some about people who were on and off your wagon. Not everyone sure, but some.
Got any reads u wanna share?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 209, BlackStar wrote:To answer the question, I think that there's no way that scum would be as obvious about it as Almost seems to be, so he's probably town.
I would say 9 out of 10 times when a player offers to martyr, it's town. But it usually feels like it comes from frustrated town. Something is off about it here, like it just feels very calculated.
And @Almost. If you are town, please stop saying that we can lynch you or that we should leave you alone cause you're our "insurance policy" lynch. It's very anti-town. I can tell you right now, the last thing anyone should do is ignore you for the whole phase and then lynch you. Mislynching is bad for the town, even if it is VT. So that's the last thing you should want.
But I'll lay off you for now and see how u start acting when ur not being pressured.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 210, TheBlueRose wrote:Almost50-As far as I'm concerned it looks like he iseitherjust a panicking defeated town who is struggling to get himself together this game, giving off very anti-town vibes. Now I'm not doubting the fact he is scum, but I feel his play is a little over the top and dramatic for being scum. Yet, I can understand that if he is town why isn't he using his time to actual use. Sure defending himself and what not, but if he really thinks he is going to get lynched I'd think he'd at least put in some effort, no?
How did the word "either" get in there? Were you originally gonna give him a null read but changed ur mind?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 242, SilverWolf wrote:I'm not even sure why this is an issue. I've already explained it. We have a hydra together, we've played together a lot, we are friends, so it is very easy for us to read each other.
How can U not be sure why it's an issue? You tell us you have a townread on someone so people question you about it. That's like, yaknow, mafia.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 248, Almost50 wrote:8. BeBopReBop RhubarbPie : 4 posts. Very weak town lean. Being wary of me is only natural.
Yup, not sure why he'd think ur wary of him.In post 249, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Except that I soft defended you.
O_o make better life choices .In post 249, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:I write up some notes after myjob interview tomorrow(wish me luck!). Right now its3 am and I'm heading to sleep.
j/k good luck to ya
Seems weird that you'd defend his play in this game then. Why would you think this sort of play was normal for him? I feel like seeing that his play this game was similar to the scum game u played w/ him should give you the OPPOSITE opinion.In post 249, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:In post 151, JarJarDrinks wrote:In post 145, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Next, almost50. Read his meta before digging too deep into this. I'm not going to attempt to read him day 1 after defending him last game only to find out he was scum, but this sort of play seems normal for him.
Have you seen his town meta?
Only a little of what I read of his town game on this site. I haven't bothered with his off site games.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 264, Almost50 wrote:I think it pretty obvious I read JarJar as town all along, and that my vote on him was to make my point go through to him.
I didn't get that impression:You really think it was OBVIOUS that you were townreading me?Spoiler:
And you're basically admitting that you voted me for ONE reason: to save your own ass. Which totally conflicts with your whole "sacrifice me" attitude.
And I know I said I'd lay off you but this shit can't be ignored.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 275, Almost50 wrote:Now someone else managed to bring you back to the same point, and -I think- you should be more concerned about them and why they needed to make a U-turn to this same point when it has been "temporarily" put on the shelf for later on.
So you think I should this post from IAI is something that I should find scummy?
Spoiler:
Do YOU find it scummy? Cause to me, it looks like a natural question to ask.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 216, SilverWolf wrote:Hi ika!!!!
Sure, I also have to re-ISO and re-read but JarJar andAlmost50 are prob town at this pointand Blackstar looks a little off to me.
Let me know what you come up with and if you agree or not.
Why the townlean on Almost?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 287, I Am Innocent wrote:Nero why can't you vote?
Twice now the mod has you listed as a no voter yet you had votes cast both times?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 288, ika wrote:In post 287, I Am Innocent wrote:Nero why can't you vote?
Twice now the mod has you listed as a no voter yet you had votes cast both times?
hes scum. if you want to wagon that i can be happy to oblige. i could prob also get silver to join up
What does your response have to do w/ what IAI is asking?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
This is all written before this SEER claim business. Will analyze all that in a bit.
Xkfyu- Town. Already stated how I liked his "Fuck it" vote for me. And I see plenty of good scumhunting.
Keysor- Town. As he pointed out, he's seeing the same things from people that I am. He's also trying to get people to expound on their posts which lines up w/ my read of his town meta
IAI- Townlean. I like his questioning of Almost and Keysor.
Ricastle- Townlean. Only a few posts but I like em. No fluff and pretty confrontational. Need more though
Robster- null. Nothing really scummy from Robster. Maybe a slight townlean but not enough content to make a real read.
Snarky- null. Basically the same as Robster but leaning slightly scum instead cause his posts have zero content.
Zulfy- null. Again, No content so no real read.
Nero- null. I like his point about bebop. I don't like his attitude about Ika. He's never pro-town regardless of alignment yet he's also easy to read?
SilverWolf- null. Started off scummy (106 feels very opportunistic even though I pretty much agree w/ the points). Then started townreading him cause I like his analysis of people defending ika. Not really crazy about his Zulf vote now.
BeBop- scumlean. I dont like his soft meta defense of Almost. I've stated why. Also I agree w/ nero that his RVS unvote comment was very LAMIST
BlackStar- scumlean. I think there's a chance that 88 was a scumslip. Though that would make Almost town which is the not the way I'm leaning
ika- scumlean. His townread on silver doesn't feel very genuine. He's kinda just throwing votes around w/ no real reasoning. He mostly ignored everything w/ Almost. Just lots of fluff in his posts.
Almost50- scum. I've posted plenty about Almost so not gonna rehash it all here.
Bluerose- scum.
- Point about ignoring my wagon stands.
- Him using the word "either" in that post points to him not really believing in his reads.
- He's townreading me for pressuring Almost who he is also townreading.
- He says keysors posts don't really look like scumhunting even though keysor and I are posting similar stuff and he's townreading me.
- He questions the Ika/Silver "sorting party" which seems good on the surface. But then they give him a non-answer and he pretty much backs off
Basically his posts seem designed to not get on anyone's bad side-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 329, Xkfyu wrote:In post 305, ika wrote:HEY NERO HOW ABOUT YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP AND STOP TRYING TO LYNCHT EH FUCKIGN SEER
Yeah sorry, I'm not buying it.
I kinda think I am. Seems like a silly risk to take w/o being anywhere near a Hammer. He get's countered and we lynch him.
This I'm w/ u onIn post 330, Xkfyu wrote:In post 314, SilverWolf wrote:Thanks for outing a PR there Nero.
You neither.
This is a statement that you make to admonish someone that you believe is town. Not to someone that you just voted for.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 338, ika wrote:no i encoaurage a seer to CC me
yeah this is pretty town.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 284, JarJarDrinks wrote:In post 216, SilverWolf wrote:Hi ika!!!!
Sure, I also have to re-ISO and re-read but JarJar andAlmost50 are prob town at this pointand Blackstar looks a little off to me.
Let me know what you come up with and if you agree or not.
Why the townlean on Almost?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 345, SilverWolf wrote:In post 343, JarJarDrinks wrote:In post 284, JarJarDrinks wrote:In post 216, SilverWolf wrote:Hi ika!!!!
Sure, I also have to re-ISO and re-read but JarJar andAlmost50 are prob town at this pointand Blackstar looks a little off to me.
Let me know what you come up with and if you agree or not.
Why the townlean on Almost?
Because of the way he's trying to self sacrifice himselfand the way he claimed VT just doesn't strike me as any benefit to scum. It looks very genuine to me.
Really, cause you didn't seem to like em very much earlier:
In post 114, SilverWolf wrote:In post 110, Almost50 wrote:In post 104, JarJarDrinks wrote:Are you scum-claiming?
I realize I did call myself an idiot, but scum claiming to be scum this early would make them the KING OF IDIOTS, which I don't claim to be.
What I'm saying is I'm 100% town, but -since nobody should/would- take my word for it, I"m offering you a short-cut. Instead of focusing on me you could invest your precious time on figuring out someone else with the comfort of knowing if your efforts are fruitless you can still vote someone (me) with mind ease.
Now what I would expect from the town-aligned peers is to gladly accept my offer. They have absolutely nothing to lose here. I haven't even asked for them to clear me, so they will simply scumhunt elsewhere for now and come back to vote me only if they can't scumread anyone else in the next week.
Do NOT let me be a hindrance to you. Remove me from your view for now. Put me aside as your insurance policy for a lynch to be executed on D1, but don't lay back & be content with it bc even if you lynch me now you get no clues from my flip either way.
P.S. If I was scum I believe I've already made it damn too hard for my scum partners to defend me. I'm the most obvious lynch target by far. A defenseless one to be more precise. Just move on for your next suspect. This is the best I could do for the town at this time.
Yeah, I hate all your posts.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 350, RadiantCowbells wrote:YOU ALL STOP THIS TILL I CAN READ.
Stop what? You want us to pause the game while u catch up?
pedit: Nobody has cast a vote since you told us u were catching up-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 366, Nero Cain wrote:In post 365, BlackStar wrote:Stop fighting over trivial shit and work together so that we can figure out who is scum
^scum
probably. Should still listen to him.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 384, BlackStar wrote:In post 380, JarJarDrinks wrote:In post 366, Nero Cain wrote:In post 365, BlackStar wrote:Stop fighting over trivial shit and work together so that we can figure out who is scum
^scum
probably. Should still listen to him.
I think its pretty interesting that people keep saying that i'm scummy and then they don't explain why. Thanks for the second part of that post though
I've explained why I'm leaning scum on u.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 393, Nero Cain wrote:b/c I don't want Ika here if all he's going to do is sit there and fuss about how "bad" my play is.
YOU'RE doing the same thing. You're BOTH shitting up the thread so stop k?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
huh?In post 395, BlackStar wrote:How can you even see that as a scum slip?In the very next post i said that I thought he was scum at that point.the reason I worded post 88 like that is that I was playing devil's advocate.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 401, JarJarDrinks wrote:
huh?In post 395, BlackStar wrote:How can you even see that as a scum slip?In the very next post i said that I thought he was scum at that point.the reason I worded post 88 like that is that I was playing devil's advocate.
OK, I actually misread ur response. This actually makes it way worse.
Like how do make this statement to someone that you think is scum:
Its just annoying because you're so focused on me that you won't be paying attention to the actual scum.-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 410, BlackStar wrote:In post 408, JarJarDrinks wrote:In post 401, JarJarDrinks wrote:
huh?In post 395, BlackStar wrote:How can you even see that as a scum slip?In the very next post i said that I thought he was scum at that point.the reason I worded post 88 like that is that I was playing devil's advocate.
OK, I actually misread ur response. This actually makes it way worse.
Like how do make this statement to someone that you think is scum:
Its just annoying because you're so focused on me that you won't be paying attention to the actual scum.
...What?
Not sure what else I can say. I feel like my point here is pretty clear. You think he's scum. Yet you say you're annoyed because "he won't be paying attention to the actual scum".-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Back to this:
In post 363, SilverWolf wrote:Right, I didn't like that post. His later posts after that look better.118 and 196 don't strike me as something scum would push.What would be the benefit to it?
You're trying to turn this around. I'm not trying to debate Almosts towniness w/ you. I'm trying to figure out why you flipped your read of him. Cause these 2 statements seem to conflict
In post 345, SilverWolf wrote:Because of the way he's trying to self sacrifice himselfand the way he claimed VT just doesn't strike me as any benefit to scum. It looks very genuine to me.
Why did 97 ping you hard?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Like this seems like a pretty strong scumread for you to abandon.
In post 106, SilverWolf wrote:VOTE: Almost 50
Jesus, could this be any more scum? Damn
Like, 58 immediately wanting to target lurkers is scummy cuz most people haven't even posted yet and scum like to pick on inactives cuz it looks like scum hunting but gets almost no return pressure
69 78 "if I was scum" stuff is overly concerned about appearances and how people approach him
97 bugs the shit out of me as well, just pings hard
As I've said, this really looks like opportunistic scum.
Like town sentiment was very anti-Almost when u posted this and it looks like you trying to get on the wagon early. Then when town sentiment was more pro-Almost, you abandoned the read. And you gave no reason for switching to a townread until you were asked.
pedit: already ahead of u-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 423, BlackStar wrote:Did you not see the post where I said I was playingdevil's advocatethere?
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
fixed ur formatting
In post 436, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:In post 266, JarJarDrinks wrote:
Seems weird that you'd defend his play in this game then. Why would you think this sort of play was normal for him? I feel like seeing that his play this game was similar to the scum game u played w/ him should give you the OPPOSITE opinion.In post 436, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Only a little of what I read of his town game on this site. I haven't bothered with his off site games.
I plan on forming most of my read on almost based on his actions rather than tone.Its not so much that I think hes innocent as that I don't trust any opinion I have of him right now. 269 does make good points. I'll keep this in mind.
Then it seems even wierder that you'd tell people to check his meta. Like, we should pay attention to his tone but you're not gonna?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
C'mon. You're really implying that they are both scum and chose to drop cause they're being scumread?-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
JarJarDrinks Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-