You can't V/LA for 2 weeks
Albert
You can't V/LA for 2 weeks
In post 2094, dramonic wrote:WT's posts are full of ass-covering and preservation.
Also kuroi's fine and the people on that wagon are (for the most part) awful.
EDIT:
@Math: What makes me say Expe's mindset is town is that I've read his posts.
Town do plenty of naked votes.
@Nahdia: Please standby...
Those are for NahdiaIn post 1002, dramonic wrote:Because his logic is so completely stupid that even he wouldn't buy into it as scum.In post 1075, dramonic wrote:In post 1012, rb wrote:@everyone who is calling Expedience Town: Wtf are you seeing in him that's Town?
He doesn't provide reasons for anything he does, he barely responds to questions, he doesn't do anything that I can even perceive as pro-town.@Both: He's provided plenty of reasons. The fact those reasons are awful beyond belief doensn't mean they aren't there. They're beyond the point of no return, but they're there.In post 1030, Luna Fox wrote:I would buy that but on my only game with Exp he at least tried to read me and provided reasoning for his scumread on me "he didn't like my townhunting strategy coz he didnt understand it at the time", here he has provided no reasoning.In post 1002, dramonic wrote:Because his logic is so completely stupid that even he wouldn't buy into it as scum.
Don't break the spell it'shilarious
EDIT: You're full of hateIn post 1250, dramonic wrote:It's disturbing that you guys can read these posts and think Expe's scum and not deranged town. You guys ableist or something?
Right now I do believe we are friends.In post 935, Almost50 wrote:
... KC claims to be able to read me, so I'll let her decide on whether we should be friends of foes here.
In post 1919, Cephrir wrote:In post 1893, Titus wrote:The thought of 22 days of this is nausea inducing.In post 1890, Heartless wrote:Honestly, if things come to that on Day 1 I'm replacing out of this game.In post 1845, Luna Fox wrote:I'm trying to see if plurality lynch might be a factor here.
Let's lynch Kuroi.
VOTE: Kuroi
In general? Probably scum. I'm really not that great town, but I think it's because I'm less afraid to piss off people as town.In post 2099, Heartless wrote:kuroi, which alignment do you prefer playing?
in retrospect, his entrance where he came after us and then how he backed off kinda gives me a smokescreen feel nowIn post 2098, Titus wrote:@anti, that's my sole concern on this wagon. Why copper?
yep, from thumbing through a few of your completed games i can tellIn post 2106, KuroiXHF wrote:In general? Probably scum. I'm really not that great town, but I think it's because I'm less afraid to piss off people as town.In post 2099, Heartless wrote:kuroi, which alignment do you prefer playing?
Why do you ask?
What about non-humans that might be friendly to humans, hmm?In post 950, Almost50 wrote:Not liking this. We need to figure out who's who and whom they're aligned with. It's not like this is a simple "everyone plays for their own" kind of game.In post 815, davesaz wrote:Actually, when I look back at Mathblade's earlier post, umm what's up with "grouping" people so early anyway?
Which brings me to this simple announcement:
- To ALL Humans (regardless of your origin, tribe and what not): Do NOT drop by (i.e. do not try to visit me).
Non-Humans are welcome to try though
here, kitty kitty kitty kitty
You two are on the same scumteam, aren't you?In post 961, Wayward Thinker wrote:
It just seems like Exp is too "out there" to be Scum IMO. I have the same problem sometimes.
a50 wasn't even close to a naked vote. i called him scum for a few posts before then tth just happened to switch the vote over then.In post 2105, dramonic wrote:These are all preeeeeeeetty much naked votes.
I'll have to look at copper in more detail. My biggest concern is that I don't remember anything that Copper has done. That gives him a we didn't playtest this feel rather than his town games.In post 2107, Heartless wrote:in retrospect, his entrance where he came after us and then how he backed off kinda gives me a smokescreen feel nowIn post 2098, Titus wrote:@anti, that's my sole concern on this wagon. Why copper?
like... if ur gonna go balls deep and give a detail like "3 alarm bells" then why would you call the react test so soon? not to mention he sort of telegraphed it in his "dont prop them up" post
idk
In post 777, Expedience wrote:Titus is defending me indirectly and saying that Mathblade is confbiasing implies that she thinks that both Mathblade and I are town. Yet she has never stated this.In post 768, MathBlade wrote:How am I conf biasing here? I have suggested a theory of you three and potentially Nos on a different team.In post 761, Titus wrote:@Math, You're confbiasing. You do that and you're very frequently wrong, regardless of alignment and you then scumread whoever disagrees.
Confirmation bias requires a history not just a suggestion when it was my catchup post.
Explain to me how Expedience is town. Because I do not see how me posting my catchup reads upon replace in confirms Expedience as town.
In post 784, Expedience wrote:Titus just got called out for indirectly defending me, and rather than make her stance more clear (since she could easily get away with saying that she was only slightly townreading me or just considering possibilities), she just doubles down on the read with terrible reasoning.
In post 859, Expedience wrote:If you're town and aware that you have weaknesses like this, then you shouldn't be voting me.In post 838, Luna Fox wrote:Because he's been calling me scum for no reason and i don't like thatIn post 829, A Song of Ice and Fire wrote:someone explain why they felt the aggression and calling so many people scum is scummy
The emote is so out of place and leads to this interpretation.
This is scummy and shows a difference between stance and implied opinion.
In this way this post is a scumclaim but I don't have the right words to describe it... I feel like I did a bad job of explaining.
In post 932, Expedience wrote:In post 824, davesaz wrote:Also @Expedience: 755 uses the word "someone" but I haven't seen you call it out."just curious", no dude you're quietly gathering evidence to paint him as scum and you're probably scum yourself.In post 927, RAM wrote:That is an incredibly weak point. Do you sincerely believe him talking about past games means he is scum here? I feel like it would have been far more contrived if he had said "last time I played as town (other than this game) was two months ago". Plus, it is arguable that using the words "the last time I did x" rather than "I haven't done x since" implies that THIS TIME x is the case. (Granted, I did not go reread those posts to see exactly what phrasing he used, I'm basing my interpretation off the exact phrasing you used to reference his comment)In post 921, Wayward Thinker wrote:It has come to my attention that rb may have scum slipped.
He said the last time he played as Town was 2 months ago. His first game he played he was Town which was May 17th, about 2 months ago.
Bad point is bad.
Cephrir, you quoted someone's list of reads(they had 3 town, and 1 scum) and you said you agreed with three of those reads, but did not specify which three. One of those town reads was on Expedience, and you later expressed positivity towards Nahdia's post attacking Expedience.
(Sorry, mobile, or I'd go back and get you the actual posts)
Anyways, just curious which three reads you agreed with from that post, and why you didn't specify it at the time...also curious about the nature of your enjoyment of that post by Nahdia. Did you agree with the Expedience read there? Or was there something else about it that you enjoyed?
Nahdia, when you wake up in the morning(and you specifically, not the other heads of your hydra), please explain this Expedience attack to me again, in a different fashion if at all possible. I don't really see the cause for the pressure on him (unless it's pressure for pressures sake, but that doesn't seem to be the case, a bunch of people appear to legitimately believe they're scum), and I'd like to understand this better. And since you started it, I feel hearing your reasoning in greater depth if at all possible would be most informative.
-Cerb
Pedit: well, it seems my first point was just addressed. Good.
VOTE: Luna Fox, I don't want to vote rb any more since he might be town.
Wayward Thinker is painfully town. Both of the largest wagons are trash and this is sad.
In post 938, Expedience wrote:Possibly the most indirect townclaim I have ever seen.In post 935, Almost50 wrote:4- Luna is probably on my side (not completely sure though)
5- Titus is probably town too.
Posts like these NahdiaIn post 988, Expedience wrote:Maybe if you repeat it enough times it'll become true.In post 978, Stormblade wrote:NO IT'S NOT. It's not about disagreeing with you. It's about you having a scum mindset. I never see town accuse someone of "not really scumreading them". It's such a disgusting way of framing a scumread. You're both discrediting scumreads on yourself and mudslinging someone else in one post, someone who happens to be fairly town, on that note. It's ridiculous. Your posts read strongly to me like someone who knows they are scum is making them. You absolutelyreekof scum motivation to me. I don't see the logic in your reads except in that you're trying to dismantle the wagon against you.
-Nahdia
I think it's a useful tell. It's not a way of framing a scumread, it's evidence to support a scumread. Luna Fox doesn't think that I'm scum but she's voting me, therefore she is scum.
Of course I'm going to "discredit my wagon" or whatever, I'm town.
Is the gladiate real?
I guess you're town though.
*elaborating: preference generally translates ----> effortIn post 2108, Heartless wrote:yep, from thumbing through a few of your completed games i can tellIn post 2106, KuroiXHF wrote:In general? Probably scum. I'm really not that great town, but I think it's because I'm less afraid to piss off people as town.In post 2099, Heartless wrote:kuroi, which alignment do you prefer playing?
Why do you ask?
Nope, I'm not Scum. But just in case you think I am, I have never been that obvious as Scum to give a teammate such a strong town read. In short, I'm not stupid, I just know when a Town player is misunderstood because I've been there.In post 2110, Klingoncelt wrote:You two are on the same scumteam, aren't you?In post 961, Wayward Thinker wrote:
It just seems like Exp is too "out there" to be Scum IMO. I have the same problem sometimes.
Admittedly, I'm learning that I have a hard time with games this quick-paced. Check my last Theme Park game. I died day one too.In post 2115, Heartless wrote:*elaborating: preference generally translates ----> effortIn post 2108, Heartless wrote:yep, from thumbing through a few of your completed games i can tellIn post 2106, KuroiXHF wrote:In general? Probably scum. I'm really not that great town, but I think it's because I'm less afraid to piss off people as town.In post 2099, Heartless wrote:kuroi, which alignment do you prefer playing?
Why do you ask?
and, no offense, but so far this looks comparatively low effort to me
This is very concerning, you received a bunch of unjustified town or leave alone reads so I had to tell them to stoo the prop. up, I explained why that shouldn't be a big deal even if it showed what I was up to cause you both can't control your dislike for scum that much, I should know, I badgered TTH in shaman for the whole game to get her out of her scum lurk mode with little success and I like to think I am a good motivator.In post 2107, Heartless wrote:in retrospect, his entrance where he came after us and then how he backed off kinda gives me a smokescreen feel nowIn post 2098, Titus wrote:@anti, that's my sole concern on this wagon. Why copper?
like... if ur gonna go balls deep and give a detail like "3 alarm bells" then why would you call the react test so soon? not to mention he sort of telegraphed it in his "dont prop them up" post