It's not taunting.In post 3250, Wake1 wrote:Not sure how I feel about dramonic's 3230, insofar as he may be taunting WT with that last line (when something seems to go beyond what is necessary, it makes you wonder).
I told you why i was scumreading Kuroi and you agreed that it was scummy but needed to hear Kuroi's side of the story.In post 3252, Wake1 wrote:Can you rephrase the question so I can understand you're asking me?
Hey, context is everything. Kuroi's response to being called our was to immediately spam posts upon a read through and latch onto the most trivial thing and tunnel. His posts before that were pushing lurker lynches with no specific names. He's appeared randomly suggesting he is keeping up with the thread, but picking fights and not analyzing players. Luna was his biggest scumread but he had missed her claim allegedly. He's not looking at players but throwing mud. When called out on it, he acts like I am engaging in a personal vendetta.In post 3250, Wake1 wrote:From what I cared to read Kuroi was complaining about a phrase and, unless there's a solid pattern of said player doing that as Scum it really means little. Also guy's here's a newsflash: pushing someone at a weak angle doesn't mean you're Scum. Just understand that. Kuroi's weak case doesn't mean he's Scum and I'd be more concerned about anyone who thinks somehow being wrong or ineffective in Mafia means you're Scum. It's NAI.
If you were respecting a response, you should have stated you wanted it.In post 3254, Luna Fox wrote:I told you why i was scumreading Kuroi and you agreed that it was scummy but needed to hear Kuroi's side of the story.In post 3252, Wake1 wrote:Can you rephrase the question so I can understand you're asking me?
I also provided relevant quotes from that time.
I still have yet to hear an answer from you about it.
Yeah yeah yada yada. You could have stopped with just the first sentence, the rest was unnecessary, i wasn't demanding a response, im still waiting for it and was reminding you of that in case you had forgotten.In post 3256, Wake1 wrote:If you were respecting a response, you should have stated you wanted it.In post 3254, Luna Fox wrote:I told you why i was scumreading Kuroi and you agreed that it was scummy but needed to hear Kuroi's side of the story.In post 3252, Wake1 wrote:Can you rephrase the question so I can understand you're asking me?
I also provided relevant quotes from that time.
I still have yet to hear an answer from you about it.
I'm not a gumball machine. You don't put a quarter in and get a Dubble Bubble in return.
Getting feedback is nice, but I don't demand to always have it in response to my posts.
And if you were assuming to get feedback, that's certainly not a question to be answered. If it were a question you still haven't provided one, so if it IS out there lost in the ether I suggest you go get it or you start modifying your approach with me.
What if he's like that in general tho?In post 3255, Titus wrote: Being wrong is NAI. Picking on something trivial and blowing it out of proportion as your sole attempt at contribution, well...
Yeah well you can't always get what you want. I'm still aware of Expedience being a chicken and sniping with 'Scummy' and then running away when I confronted him on it. Not sure how many Townies take up guerrilla tactics but OK then.In post 3255, Luna Fox wrote:Yeah yeah yada yada. You could have stopped with just the first sentence, the rest was unnecessary, i wasn't demanding a response, im still waiting for it and was reminding you of that in case you had forgotten.In post 3256, Wake1 wrote:If you were respecting a response, you should have stated you wanted it.In post 3254, Luna Fox wrote:I told you why i was scumreading Kuroi and you agreed that it was scummy but needed to hear Kuroi's side of the story.In post 3252, Wake1 wrote:Can you rephrase the question so I can understand you're asking me?
I also provided relevant quotes from that time.
I still have yet to hear an answer from you about it.
I'm not a gumball machine. You don't put a quarter in and get a Dubble Bubble in return.
Getting feedback is nice, but I don't demand to always have it in response to my posts.
And if you were assuming to get feedback, that's certainly not a question to be answered. If it were a question you still haven't provided one, so if it IS out there lost in the ether I suggest you go get it or you start modifying your approach with me.
This isn't aIn post 3256, Wayward Thinker wrote:Luna and Wake looks like TvT.
OK, but TlT doesn't quite have the same ring to it.In post 3260, Wake1 wrote:This isn't aIn post 3256, Wayward Thinker wrote:Luna and Wake looks like TvT.vanything.
It's alesson.
How about you provide a reason that doesn't require another game for scum reading Kuroi when you've been pledging your vote to the highest bidder instead of posting cases?In post 2897, Titus wrote:Then you can keep going through and ignoring all the people saying you're scum with Klingon to comment on a narrative retelling. Or you could actually discuss reads.In post 2892, KuroiXHF wrote:The psychotic thing is not game-relevant. We've already touched upon that subject and I'm not going to discuss that with you.In post 2877, Titus wrote:@Nero,
My opinion, yes. I believe I have said so. It's a meta observation from someone who hates meta routinely. Nor should you have to read gunslingers. I didn't go full ham on Kuroi until he called Mollie psychotic to discredit her, until then I was meh whichever scumread. I don't think Kuroi makes that mistake again though.
Tbh, I feel like I cannot talk about any of my strengths in this game because lol cult.
@Cerb, Read Tim's observations. Klingon mentions Kuroi maybe all of once scumreading him. Zero interaction there. The void emptiness of interactions says something. Kuroi and Kling don't really try to sort each other.
Nope showing you are actively reading and not commenting on the scumhunting seemed like the way to go.
Have anything to say about what you allegedly want to talk about?
Apparently you need an lesson in courtesy and manners however ^_^In post 3260, Wake1 wrote:This isn't aIn post 3256, Wayward Thinker wrote:Luna and Wake looks like TvT.vanything.
It's alesson.
Look Cephrir can avoid posting reads again instead changes words of Kuroi's thoughts.In post 2905, Cephrir wrote:In post 2903, KuroiXHF wrote:I am actually scum, and the other leading wagons are too. Look over here, wouldn't you rather go for a nice tasty lurker lynch?
I shall also point you in the direction of: 2646In post 3263, MathBlade wrote:How about you provide a reason that doesn't require another game for scum reading Kuroi
At your request of not quoting the first post, I can tell you there is at least one faction considered town, there is at least one faction considered scum, and that players considered town hold the majority on N1.In post 3147, MathBlade wrote:@Mod: How many factions are in this game? Without quoting the first post because people don't read or just don't read?
) Look, there is a good chance that I get flipped day 1 so I thought it might help for me to comment on reads as I see them. You disagree?In post 3265, dramonic wrote:Well T|T doesn't give the illusion that you're contributing to the game, so it's more accurate.
So who are you scum reading right now and why? I see you saying "I town read X" (paraphrase) all day after pushing various lynches.In post 2916, Luna Fox wrote:I have a bad feeling about this sudden surge of votes on Klingon.
Correct me if im wrong but when i read the reasoning seemed to be something about she thinking Kuroi was CW to WT but then thinking Kuroi was scum (or was that in reverse?)
In post 3270, MathBlade wrote:So who are you scum reading right now and why? I see you saying "I town read X" (paraphrase) all day after pushing various lynches.In post 2916, Luna Fox wrote:I have a bad feeling about this sudden surge of votes on Klingon.
Correct me if im wrong but when i read the reasoning seemed to be something about she thinking Kuroi was CW to WT but then thinking Kuroi was scum (or was that in reverse?)
Are you just ignoring me now?In post 3267, Luna Fox wrote:I shall also point you in the direction of: 2646In post 3263, MathBlade wrote:How about you provide a reason that doesn't require another game for scum reading Kuroi
She "ignored" my case on Kuroi. She is doing the read and post thing. I swear like half the fucking posts are people asking to fetch, me fetching, or lame ass catch up posts, which only perpetuates the cycle.In post 3271, Luna Fox wrote:In post 3270, MathBlade wrote:So who are you scum reading right now and why? I see you saying "I town read X" (paraphrase) all day after pushing various lynches.In post 2916, Luna Fox wrote:I have a bad feeling about this sudden surge of votes on Klingon.
Correct me if im wrong but when i read the reasoning seemed to be something about she thinking Kuroi was CW to WT but then thinking Kuroi was scum (or was that in reverse?)Are you just ignoring me now?In post 3267, Luna Fox wrote:I shall also point you in the direction of: 2646In post 3263, MathBlade wrote:How about you provide a reason that doesn't require another game for scum reading Kuroi
How would preventing a mislynch be bad for the game state? I'd rather iron out those grievances rather than mislynch. Do I expect 100% OMG almighty from the sky post the damn role PM in the thread levels of confirmed no. But reasons are good.In post 2926, Titus wrote:I'm about a 7-9. Same as Kuroi and Wake.
That being said, if you feel better on Kuroi, stay there. I don't have a guilty. We're both voting scum.
While I'd hate a WT lynch, I cannot prove their town without greatly damaging the health of the game state. We have town mostly working together.