DEFCON Mafia 4.0 - СЛАВА РОССИИ МАТЕРИ

Cheetory6 · Post Post #425 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 1:33 am

In post 410, hiplop wrote:
In post 403, Accountant wrote:Not to be crude but it kinda looked like you were sucking UT's dick there
thats exactly what i was doing

Lol.
What in the fuck am I reading.

McMenno · Post Post #426 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 2:06 am

In post 423, Accountant wrote:McMenno, what are your reads?

my only read is disappointment

Papa Zito · Post Post #427 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:02 am

oh my god WHY IS THIS 18 PAGES

Papa Zito · Post Post #428 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:30 am

Ok read it.

Nahdia and RedCoyote need death pronto. Have I got my nukes yet.

Accountant · Post Post #429 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:31 am

reasoning?

I feel like you skimmed given the timestamps between posts

xRECKONERx · Post Post #430 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:32 am

In post 369, GuyInFreezer wrote:
In post 323, xRECKONERx wrote:the guy who said "hey i finally rolled town in a large theme" is town
Why?

because scum don't make that post

xRECKONERx · Post Post #431 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:33 am

In post 387, Accountant wrote:Reck plz change ur vote

In post 388, Accountant wrote:I know you're town why are you anti-killing-scum

if i change it someone else is just gonna flip to anti-war anyway

xRECKONERx · Post Post #432 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:34 am

In post 405, Something_Smart wrote:discussion tabled for now- Reck

i feel likje this is my life in every mafia game i play gfd

ISO · Post Post #433 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:35 am

In post 410, hiplop wrote:
In post 403, Accountant wrote:Not to be crude but it kinda looked like you were sucking UT's dick there
thats exactly what i was doing

hot

In post 418, McMenno wrote:on page 6 and I think redcoyote is scum currently

no it's not because he's against total war

cheetory is town maybe

i feel like youre expecting this to be a Unique Special Snowflake Read sorry to disappoint you

cheetory is adorable and i just want to take him home with me

ISO · Post Post #434 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:35 am

i think you're town, reck!

Accountant · Post Post #435 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:40 am

Reck is town yeah

I'm having trouble sorting out whether mcmenno's behavior is playstyle or not

Papa Zito · Post Post #436 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:46 am

In post 429, Accountant wrote:reasoning?

I feel like you skimmed given the timestamps between posts

I'm sorry to hear you're a slow reader.

Though I admit I did skim everything mastin posted and I'm going to make sure we're not in another game together.

Accountant · Post Post #437 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:50 am

I guess it makes more sense if you ignored the mastin posts

Accountant · Post Post #438 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:50 am

Reasoning for the nahdia and rc scumreads tho?

McMenno · Post Post #439 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:52 am

In post 427, Papa Zito wrote:oh my god WHY IS THIS 18 PAGES

why does this fact surprise people

Papa Zito · Post Post #440 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:55 am

In post 438, Accountant wrote:Reasoning for the nahdia and rc scumreads tho?

Yes I have those.

Menno I was

hoping

for less because #effort

Accountant · Post Post #441 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:56 am

ok so share it

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #442 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:07 am

In post 430, xRECKONERx wrote:
In post 369, GuyInFreezer wrote:
In post 323, xRECKONERx wrote:the guy who said "hey i finally rolled town in a large theme" is town
Why?
because scum don't make that post

Digging further will get me "too scummy to be scum" thing won't it

Nahdia · Post Post #443 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:09 am

I'm fine being policy-nuked after I remove Counterintelligence from the game if that's how you wanna play it, Zeetoe.

@Cheetory I modded this game with scum!Accountant http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=67256
Perception of town!Accountant is from a game I watched http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=68000
In fairness though I hadn't recalled the town Accountant I'd seen is from a Newbie game where plenty of people who tend to be forceful do act a bit more gentle so eh.

Not liking Dayne. 372 was just bad IMO. There was nothing about the post Spiff made that pinged me in the slightest so I really don't understand such a forceful call-out like that. Reads as just fake to me.

Disagree with Accountant that 375 is bad. I make posts like this as town.

Recks' 321 is needlessly defensive and 430 bugs me. I make flippant early reads on really minor stuff too but that just feels a bit

too

simple a post to form a read on.

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #444 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:10 am

In post 407, Something_Smart wrote:of all the responses to 26

lolnope

McMenno · Post Post #445 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:11 am

In post 423, Accountant wrote:McMenno, what are your reads?

you can be a townread

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #446 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:11 am

Man I haven't played the game this big in a while so it'll take me time to try to keep track of everyone lol

Papa Zito · Post Post #447 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:12 am

In post 443, Nahdia wrote:I'm fine being nuked from the game if that's how you wanna play it, Zeetoe.

Excellent.

@Reck: Gimme my dayvig I have needs man

Accountant · Post Post #448 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:16 am

@Nahdia: I was particularly unmotivated in Banana Split for reasons I don't fully understand. It happens, I just get bad vibes or tiredness about games from the start sometimes. So that's not indicative about my meta. I can show you some games where I have been very authoritative to the point of hubris as town.

Nahdia · Post Post #449 (ISO) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:21 am

In post 448, Accountant wrote:@Nahdia: I was particularly unmotivated in Banana Split for reasons I don't fully understand. It happens, I just get bad vibes or tiredness about games from the start sometimes. So that's not indicative about my meta. I can show you some games where I have been very authoritative to the point of hubris as town.

Mm, alright. Honestly, I usually try to stray basing reads in meta because stuff like this can corrupt meta-reads easily. I think it's more useful seeing people react to meta-reads on them is pretty much as useful as the meta themselves in a lot of cases.