Open 53: Near-Vanilla - Game over!

[skitzer]

Vote: dramamoose

Because mooses are funny! LOL!

Soryr, caffeine high right now.

[skitzer]

unvote

First vote count; I'm no longer random voting.

Time to get serious.

[skitzer]

Disciple Slayer, do you actually think this is a good way to play?

First you fake claim, than you claim again, which is clearly fake.

FoS: Disciple Slayer

[skitzer]

Me as well.

[skitzer]

EBWOP: to induce some conversation, I will pick a random name off the player list and ask them who is most scummilicious.

Original Roll String: 1d13

1 13-Sided Dice: (6) = 6

[/dice]

[skitzer]

OpposedForce, in your own words, can you please tell us who you believe is most suspicious and give a brief explanation?

[skitzer]

For all we know, anyone could be a doc.

[skitzer]

welcome, Thesp.

It's funny how both the DS's have my attention now: Disciple Slayer because of his strange, seemingly thoughtless play, and deadscilent, because of this:

DS: I know you're not the Doc. If you had such an important role why annoce it day one to the scum that will be killing you tonight?

How exactly do you know that Discliple Slayer isn't the doc?

[skitzer]

Why are we not lynching TSN?

Why should we?

[skitzer]

Phate: Explanation of vote?

Crub: Your last post up there: Pseudo-QFT. I'm lazy and don't want to quote it.

SweatspantsNinja: I'm not exactly sure about what a policy lynch is, but I'm sure it's not a good idea. Like he said, he is pretty unreadable when he plays like this. I'm not saying it's a good thing. To me, DS is kind of saying, "Ha, ha, you can't see through this!"

[skitzer]

Shanba: I think that a DS lynch is not a good idea, as I aforementioned, he is quite hard to read, and although the sanity of this game would be increased with him gone, the well-being may be severely detrimented because we have no hard evidence on him except for his blatant posts.

TheSweatpantsNinja was likely trying to lynch DS for easier gameplay. I can see both sides of this argument.

FomS: Shanba
FomS: TheSweatpantsNinja

[skitzer]

dramamoose has posted once, I feel a prod would be of great need.

[skitzer]

Mod: Could you prod dramamoose as well?

Done

[skitzer]

Sorry I've been kind of lurky. I haven't had much to goo on, except for maybe killa seven not replying to whoever's "Are you scum?" question.

[skitzer]

Man, this day's gone on too long.

I'm getting desperate to get someone lynched.

The post that really sets me off wrong about rw is:

to all the people who are voting for me, i think it says something to my innocence that I'm still here posting and defending myself when it would be so gosh-darn easy for to slip into lurking and let the whole thing blow other.

Bolded makes me somewhat suspicious of TSN. Although TSN quoted a very suspicious post by RW too.

Not very big leads, but suspicions all the same.

[skitzer]

MelodyMan, although you are new, that does not make sense. Maybe if you were to explain your suspicions in-thread for everyone to see, you would find one more scummy than the other, rather than base it on others' votes alone.

[skitzer]

OK, I'm sorry for not posting, but I feel by looking back at games, I don't really do much on Day 1, I feel like I need a whole day cycle to look.

I can clearly see why people are voting for MelodyMan, and he is my biggest suspicion, but I don't want to put him at L-2 just yet. They may have been newb mistakes.

I don't see much of a point on RossWilliam.

I'm sorry I'm not much of a contributer.

[skitzer]

Because of his first vote. He voted for the person with the most votes between his two suspicoins

[skitzer]

OK, my choice for deadline is melodyman. I feel as though his first vote wasn't good, and I don't believe he has been very contributive otherwise. In that case,

Vote: Melodyman23

[skitzer]

I can see the mistakes on killa seven's part, but I'm not so sure it warrants a lynch.

[skitzer]

EBWOP: not "lynch", "vote".

[skitzer]

Sorry.

I'm not sure I see the big point on Crub. He may have been analysing something that needed this retrospect. If he's trying to help the game, let it be.

FoS: Korlash

for not answering his question and instead turning the point back on him.

[skitzer]

Ooh, your right something is wrong with that.

Nullify the FoS. I still don't understand why you voted for Crub.

[skitzer]

Oh ok.

[skitzer]

Justin: I don't really have an opinion on Crub right now. But if he's trying to help the town, which yes, was wrongly worded, then it would be ok. I think it would help if Crub could explain his true intentions.

I think I was in a hurry when I wrote that post. Sorry.

[skitzer]

neko: I feel Crub's tunnel-vision did not help the game, which did give a somewhat reasonable reason for Korlash's vote, but I don't get why you asked someone to answer a question after another. Explain.

[skitzer]

Well if he's "recuperated" from his tunnel-vision, then I don't see it as much more then something to note. The "oh ok" was because his remark concerning curbs.

[skitzer]

On what? I'm confused. I guess I didn't read it correctly. For some reason I thought Crub asked a question, and Korlash voted him for asking the question, and thats why I found Crub suspicious...I had the wrong people.

[skitzer]

wiat, don't prod me!

I'm going to reread through the past stuff.

[skitzer]

I'm sorry, this game has sort of fallen out of my attention. I've been paying attention, but I haven't really been making posts. I'll try to reread and post later, I've had an immensley busy week.

[skitzer]

OK, I would like to mention two people in this game:

TheSweatpantsNinja

The first thing I noticed was that he has been very anti-lurker the entire game. Now, I don't want to say that lurkers are good, but I think it truly depends on the setup. In an open setup, this is easily seen. Lurkers are not good for the town in which the setup includes a heavy number of power roles, and it appears we only have one power role remaining. Still, lurkers can be bad, as they are not helping the town.

Then, I noticed, at one point, TSN voted crub, which I totally didn't see any reasoning behind, seeing as I had reread Crub right before TSN, and I saw crub as a distinctly town player.

killa seven

I don't believe in metas. If you were to take a meta of killa seven, you might be tempted to vote him, but I have seen that there is no relation. What irks me a minor bit is that he has played more to aid the town in this game, which maybe just experience showing, but it's something I want to keep my eye on.

[skitzer]

neko - I meant that usually, killa isn't very helpful, but this time he is being somewhat helpful, which is odd.

Justin - he hasn't really done anything to harm the town, It just seems like he's not scum.

[skitzer]

Well, not to be rude, but usually k7 doesn't scum hunt very much, but I do see him attempting it every once in a while. That's what makes it strange.

[skitzer]

I'm sorry, neko, but to put it bluntly, k7 has just been acting strange. He's not like himself in this game.

[skitzer]

I'm sorry, I've just have nothing to expound upon ATM. Maybe with some replacements we can get this game going again.

[skitzer]

My views on TSN were negative, but my K7 views were semi positive, therefore I guess the only one I find scummy is TSN...

vote: TSN