Mini 549 (Tarhalindur Mostly Mountainous) - Game Over

[Earwig]

Vote: Jester

for not confirming

FoS: Ectomancer

for FoS'ing me, and 'cause he's always scum.

[Earwig]

Unvote: Jester

Vote: Nyktorion

for voting Jester 11 minutes after me.

[Earwig]

ectomancer's quick accusation of tamuz reeks of scum to me
his logic doesnt make any sense and i get the feeling he was trying to start a quick day 1 bandwagon for no reason

fos:ectomancer

I've been in a couple of games with Ectomancer before. That's just his play style. If you check out other games he's in or has been in, you'll see that.

[Earwig]

Trying to get in my good graces Earwig? Scum...

No, I'm trying to make everyone think we're scum buddies by defending you.

On another note, SlySly has only had 3 posts. The first a random vote - nothing unusual there. The next 2 were nothing of substance. Seems to be lurking to me.

At first look, it might appear that Rosso Carne is lurking as well. I've been in game or 2 with him - this seems to be his play style. That, or he really is always scum.

Also, I have to agree with Nyktorion:

Unvote, Vote: Rosso Carne

for trying to look active without adding content.

Although I appreciate the support on voting off the Nazi, I have a large problem with your ''reason''.

First -- ''Trying to look active'' makes no sense. One is either active or not active. There is no such thing as ''looking active.''

Second -- It's early in the game, how is someone supposed to add content this early when it's barely started?

Overall -- Your reason for voting RC is completely invalid. The accusation is a huge stretch and I'm unsure at this moment whether I consider this a scumtell or not.

Well, it is still possible to have many posts without really saying much (or in other words: to have a good difference between the number of posts and the number of relevant posts). And while you are right that my accusation might be miniscule in a progressed game, I think it is still a good reason for a vote considering the current ((semi-)random) state of the game, and the other possible reasons to vote for someone currently.

However, I find it quite interesting how you fiercely you are rushing towards Rosso's defence in the face of my rather semi-random accusation. Might be a slight first tell that you both have the same alignment, and that you know about that.

However, I'm going to go one step further.

Unvote: thenextepisode

Vote: Blackberry

Yes, I realize that puts Blackberry at 3 votes - no danger of lynch yet.

[Earwig]

I can see my post had the desired effect.

……….. In other news: Earwig, your post 49 is treading on the edge of some very dangerous territory. Please, for your sake, review Rule 3 carefully, and note that scumbuddy claims are something that I am unlikely to be lenient on. Consider this a warning. -Tar

……………………

Warning taken. It won't happen again. I meant it as a joke.

………………………..
Do you care to explain why you are voting me? O_o

On a side note -- I know nothing of RC's alignment. I simply found your "reason" suspiscious.

I was voting you because Nyktorion stated you were "fiercly" rushing to Rosso's defense, then he said that might be a tell that you were alligned with Rosso.

Vote: Blackberry

Yes, I realize that puts Blackberry at 3 votes - no danger of lynch yet.

What's this line all about? No danger of lynch yet? Isn't that rather the whole point of a vote, to lynch someone? Why do you need to reassure us that he is in no actual danger?

It was a pre-emptive statement. I was expecting everyone to get all over my case because I put someone at 3 votes. Yes, the whole point is to lynch someone.

Post 14:

Vote: Nyktorion

for voting Jester 11 minutes after me.

Post 49

Unvote: thenextepisode

Vote: Blackberry

Yes, I realize that puts Blackberry at 3 votes - no danger of lynch yet.

@Earwig: Don't you remember who you were voting for?

I was going by the vote count. After checking, I see that I must have been on something - I obviously looked at it wrong.



While I'm at it:

Unvote

[Earwig]

On another note, SlySly has only had 3 posts. The first a random vote - nothing unusual there. The next 2 were nothing of substance. Seems to be lurking to me.

Interesting that you didn't accuse myself or Dean Harper or johoohno of this. All three of us had fewer posts than SlySly up to your 49. For the record, I tend to play this game by making longish posts every two or three days. I also don't play MS on weekends unless the game is at a critical phase.

Also, a sort of newbie question. The title of the game is "Mostly Mountainous." From what I understand, a mountainous game is slang for one that has multiple mafia groups. Is that correct?

I was only trying to stir things up. SlySly wasn’t the only one with few or no posts.

[Earwig]

Weren't you in Strawberry, Blackberry? Check all of the games I've been in (there haven't been that many) My play style is the same.

[Earwig]

why are you happy?

[Earwig]

..........................Earwig, I'm happy because you are scum and my vote is on you. berry is suspect though...............

Would you be willing to provide reasons?

[Earwig]

Vote: Tamuz

for not responding, and for not explaining.

[Earwig]

/prodded

[Earwig]

My vote stays on Tamuz for a weak defense of a vote, where he has to stretch the truth, trying to resemble a valid defense.

[Earwig]

I just got poked by Tarhalindur.

Johoohno - you're focusing way too much on setup. Just play the game.

[Earwig]

Why does it feel like thenextepisode is hiding a lie?

because he had 3 votes on him already...

These 2 posts make me think thenextepisode is scum

Vote: thenextepisode

[Earwig]

ill HAMMAH! after hes at L-1 for 12 hours.

just saying.

A few things here:

1) You're already voting for him
2) He's at L-2 now, not L-1
3) You seems to love to "HAMMAH!" a little too much.

[Earwig]

Rosso just has a jackass play style. It doesn't necessarily mean he's scum.

UnVote

For now.

[Earwig]

It doesn't. I was responding/commenting on more than one thing.

[Earwig]

@ Battousai: When you've read through the day, I'd like a your thoughts on your predecessors posts.

That doesn't seem like very good sportsmanship.

[Earwig]

/prodded

[Earwig]

/prodded. One of these days I'm going to actually post something.

[Earwig]

BTW Earwig, your post is shit, I do note that you aren't doing anything real.

I don't really care what you note, Tamuz.

Also, I can't believe you let Ecto get under your skin. As he said - this is a GAME - nothing more. I've been in games with him before - This is how he plays.

[Earwig]

Vote: mozsuggs

for out of the blue voting me and not giving reason.

I have suspicions on several people, butam not voting because I am having a hard time with re-reading. I can't get it done in one session, and have to start all over again.

I will unvote if given a valid reason for the vote.

[Earwig]

Claiming scum is a lynchable offense.

It is in the rules. I got put n notice for joking about it early on.

[Earwig]

I'm surprised SlySly tured out t be town. I was pretty sure he was scum, mainly based on the fact he used the term "pro-town" quite a bit. I had previously only heard scum use that term. :arrow:

[Earwig]

vote:tne

Why? What is your reasoning?

For not providing reasoning, and general jask assery:

Vote: Rosso Carne

[Earwig]

Alright Lurkerwig, you've sat around for 23 pages. Are you sure this is the move? Humor me by recounting the past case against Rosso Carne. Surely your latest reasons are meant to sit upon that foundation, so I'd be interested in

your

interpretation of that foundation.

Alright Scumtomancer -

My vote on Rosso has nothing to do with pat cases against him. In fact, I

sort of

agree with Mizzy on this point. His sparse posting habits alone are not reason enough to think he's scum. I was in a game where he was town and he acted the sam way. It is still possible he's scum. At the very least he's a jack ass player. That doesn't make him scum either.

My vote on Rosso is simply because he had posted nothing in awhile, then out of the blue, places a vote on thenextepisode. I stated as much in the post I voted in. I at least gave reason for my vote.


@Tar:

If Rosso Carne fails to post by tomorrow evening then he will be replaced.

Rosso posted Tuesday morning early - post 571. Not much to the post, but at least he did post. Why he above?

My vote stands on Rosso - until he gives some reason for voting tne