Mini 549 (Tarhalindur Mostly Mountainous) - Game Over

ryan · Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:53 am

Vote: Dean Harper

Cause all Dean's are evil.

ryan · Post Post #29 (isolation #1) » Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:47 am

Tamuz: The mod count is off as it has me voting (correct) and not voting as well.

ryan · Post Post #62 (isolation #2) » Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:11 pm

Unvote

I think there is more than just random stuff going on right now

ryan · Post Post #66 (isolation #3) » Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:53 am

Uh........I had a random vote on till I lifted it and now am watching Rosso and Blackberry as those two are the two that most interest me currently along with Earwig for their posting content, I'm not sure how that validates a vote but to each his own.

ryan · Post Post #74 (isolation #4) » Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:30 am

Rosso Carne: Pressure away my friend, but if you are pressuring me for "lurking" as you stated, than make sure you've got your facts correct on people and what they've posted in this game so far.

ryan · Post Post #87 (isolation #5) » Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:42 am

Blackberry wrote:My theory on Earwig does not work, as a result his role is inconclusive. lol

I'm interested in said theory, care to share?

ryan · Post Post #92 (isolation #6) » Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:28 am

Than why the heck bring it up in the first place?

ryan · Post Post #126 (isolation #7) » Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:18 am

Blackberry: Coming out with some "theory" (when you could have easily kept it to yourself) and than jumping on people and being very defense on legit questions what said "theory" was isn't helpful to the town (it's distracting) Now we've got players who find you hiding something (which to me seems a stretch) It's not worth a vote but I have to admit I don't understand your intentions for doing this and keeping it up.

FoS: Blackberry

ryan · Post Post #144 (isolation #8) » Sat Jan 26, 2008 7:53 am

So Berry has reasons to attack him YET you vote Earwig?

ryan · Post Post #146 (isolation #9) » Sat Jan 26, 2008 7:57 am

That's not what I would qualify scummy but there have been other legit arguments brought up against him

ryan · Post Post #160 (isolation #10) » Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:17 am

How do you know what Blackberry's theory is?

ryan · Post Post #163 (isolation #11) » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:46 am

Rosso Carne wrote:
ryan wrote:How do you know what Blackberry's theory is?
he said "i have to read earwigs other games"

thats the definition of metagaming.

it didnt mesh.

are you a dumbass or just on drugs?

Does insulting people make you feel like a better player? I asked why him reading Earwig's game was an obvious reason for his theory (he could have thought he found a tell and was looking to see if it was done earlier) if you don't have an intelligent answer to my question, don't answer.

ryan · Post Post #177 (isolation #12) » Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:07 am

Vote: Blackberry

The more I go back and look, the more I believe the "theory" was used to muddy up the game (I'll admit it worked on me) and get us off track of finding scum. I think the inability to give any other insight in the game except to constantly defend this "idea" is just backtracking. Rosso Carne isn't sitting well with me right now (especially after obvious defense of Blackberry) which will be noted for later on as he'd be my #2 on my current scumdar.

ryan · Post Post #211 (isolation #13) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:04 am

Blackberry wrote:
UNVOTE --- VOTE: RYAN

I is know.

Should I consider this an OMGUS vote?

ryan · Post Post #216 (isolation #14) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:26 am

I'm not scum Blackberry so THANK you for feeling more confident about my vote on you.

1) You're scum that's why I'm voting (terrible argument)

2) A vote on me outta nowhere (another suspect reason)

You are looking scummier and scummier all the time.

ryan · Post Post #218 (isolation #15) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:05 am

1) When you argue that somebody is "scum" without evidence THAT is a bad argument, please read what I type and not what you want to read. Basically all you are saying is "You are scum, I'm right" and that is a craptastic argument

2) Where's your evidence again? I've at least explained why I agree with arguments put on you already and stated my own opinions. This is a game of READING, look into it and than come back with something

ryan · Post Post #220 (isolation #16) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:11 am

You are an idiot.

ryan · Post Post #222 (isolation #17) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:20 am

No you are an idiot because.............

1) I'm not scum (and playing a game without giving evidence is just stupid) Even if you were town (which I don't believe you are) you'd at least come up with something more than just "you're scum, I know it" I mean seriously dude, somebody who's been on this site for almost three years should be ALOT smarter than you come off.

2) You don't think this is a game of reading and re-acting to other people's posts, when this is EXACTLY what this freakin game is. How else do you play the game moron?

3) You don't think you need evidence on why somebody is scum (just go with the gut and blindly vote people?) I mean COME on now, you can't be that stupid.

4) You aren't helping the town and haven't been. Your theory was distracting (on purpose) and you haven't done anything but mess around with your font and basically distract (distracting=ANTI town) the entire game. You haven't done a town thing this entire game and I'm calling you out on it.

ryan · Post Post #224 (isolation #18) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:26 am

Sure it is Blackberry, keep smoking the pipe my friend

ryan · Post Post #227 (isolation #19) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:29 am

No I'm implying you are scum muddying up the waters, WHAT part of that are you not understanding?

ryan · Post Post #236 (isolation #20) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:20 am

Jester wrote:Agreed, ROTN. ryan's so off his normal track in this game I'm tempted to think he might be a bad guy.
FOS: ryan

My normal track?

ryan · Post Post #239 (isolation #21) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:08 pm

SlySly wrote:
ryan wrote:
Jester wrote:Agreed, ROTN. ryan's so off his normal track in this game I'm tempted to think he might be a bad guy.
FOS: ryan
My normal track?
Apparently you have quite a reputation. In a game I played recently, my posting style was compared to yours. Paraphrasing what Korlash said, "You post just like Ryan, and oh how I hate Ryan."

Keep up the good work. Anyone that Korlash hates can't be all bad!!

Well if my reputation is aggressive than I'm fine with that.

ryan · Post Post #255 (isolation #22) » Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:54 am

Unvote

ryan · Post Post #260 (isolation #23) » Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:18 am

Why does it feel like thenextepisode is hiding a lie?

ryan · Post Post #287 (isolation #24) » Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:54 am

thenextepisode wrote:At the request of RangeroftheNorth, I will properly punctuate my sentences.
It seems I now have reason to continue keeping up with this game because not everyone has bought in on my bandwagon. I encourage you to let my newbness slide and to grant me a reprieve by unvoting.
I still believe that Rosso Carne is scum, and if Blackberry were active he would have jumped on my wagon too.

Grant you a reprieve? How do we know you aren't a new scum begging for his life?

ryan · Post Post #290 (isolation #25) » Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:41 am

thenextepisode: Please explain again why you aren't mafia? You seem to be trying to use the "noob" tag to get yourself out of this current jam you are in and I'm having trouble buying it

ryan · Post Post #299 (isolation #26) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:42 am

How does Rosso's playstyle effect your vote on tne?

ryan · Post Post #301 (isolation #27) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:53 am

Thank you for clarifying

ryan · Post Post #305 (isolation #28) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:23 am

Are you serious Jester? You challenged me? You stated why you thought I was not playing as I "allegedly normally do" I disagreed with your statements, did you want me to waste 4 pages going back and forth with you and bickering? It's counterproductive to do so, and I chose not to. You say when I'm "sure" about somebody I go after them..........well as you can see with me currently not voting I'm not "sure" about anyone right now. I've got suspicions on Rosso Carne and thenextepisode, but it's not enough to lay a vote at the present time. Now if I was voting somebody and wasn't constantly going after them, THAN yes you could use that as a tell, but I'm not voting right now and not going after anyone as you stated "aggressively" so your scum tell, is null and void.

ryan · Post Post #315 (isolation #29) » Fri Feb 15, 2008 6:42 am

LOL, I don't why but this made me laugh. Nice response (insert sarcasm)