Mini 559 - Cult Mafia again - Game over
-
-
militant Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 192
- Joined: January 20, 2008
- Location: Europe
-
-
XReyoX Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 857
- Joined: March 3, 2007
- Location: London
-
-
lalaland Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 10
- Joined: January 31, 2008
- Location: lalaland...
and I'm the same lalalandmilitant wrote:Yes, lalaland, i am the very same militant from cchttp://www.conquerclub.com/index.php?ref=81252 ConquerClub.com -- Free online risk game. And there's mafia there, too! [/url]-
-
XReyoX
-
-
Oman NK Immune Miller Vig
- NK Immune Miller Vig
- NK Immune Miller Vig
- Posts: 7014
- Joined: June 19, 2007
-
-
XReyoX Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 857
- Joined: March 3, 2007
- Location: London
-
-
omg_im_innocent_wtf Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 410
- Joined: August 14, 2006
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
Official Vote Count(Page 2)
omg_im_innocent_wtf– 2 (Elias_the_thief, Norinel)
militant– 1 (dahen)
XreyoX– 1 (lalaland)
Friend of Old– 1 (GhostWriter)
Norinel– 1 (Oman)
Not Voting:Blazerunner, Friend of Old, GSGold, militant, omg_im_innocent_wtf, XreyoX
With 12 alive, it's 7 to lynch. 6 is a no lynch.
Will be prodding those who have yet to post in thread in 24 hours or so. I will let you know when I prod.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
Norinel Not Voting (3)
- Not Voting (3)
- Not Voting (3)
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: March 2, 2003
- Location: My computer
If people are going to be fake claiming anyway, what's the point of claiming at all? Claiming to give the town info (Like the cop with results) is certainly a good idea regardless, but there doesn't seem to be any other good reason to claim if people are expecting pro-town people to not necessarily tell the truth.
Did anyone else think this is a little bit unnecessary and overdefensive for Page 1? The two votes on omg at that point were both entirely spurious.omg_im_innocent_wtf wrote:forget commenting on me.
if everyone is 100% sure im mafia/cultist, it STILL makes sense in such a role filled game for us to first discuss tactics. and logic is logic, regardless of anyones role.-
-
GSGold Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 21
- Joined: January 20, 2008
- Location: Indiana
Whoa, didn't realize this game started. Claiming/Fake Claiming on Day 1 seems to have no point, since we really don't have a lot to go on in a Day start.
I agree. With the amount of players, it could easilly spiral into a bandwagon, however, so I'm not sure if he was just a bit jumpy on the idea of a bandwagon against him for no reason or what.Norinel wrote:Did anyone else think this is a little bit unnecessary and overdefensive for Page 1? The two votes on omg at that point were both entirely spurious.-
-
Friend of Old Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 89
- Joined: October 4, 2007
- Location: England - South
Fake claiming is definately a can of worms, especially as that would give the scum a 'get out of jail free' card, as it were. I'd suggest claiming true and claiming late if at all possible. Circumstances will vary of course. However I do understand the merits of such play, especially if it saves townies from the cult.
One thing I'd like to know however is where
came from. Nobody is seriously pointing the finger at anybody, so why post that?if everyone is 100% sure im mafia/cultist, it STILL makes sense in such a role filled game for us to first discuss tactics. and logic is logic, regardless of anyones role.The [i]FoO[/i] is watching...-
-
omg_im_innocent_wtf Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 410
- Joined: August 14, 2006
it was in response to this post from elias. i felt that was pretty obvious tbh.
im not being defensive at all. im making a general point that before we start looking to accuse people we should discuss overall strategy.Elias_the_thief wrote:ugh. dont feel like commenting on all that stuff from OMG at present. I can back up his claim of not random voting though, ive played with him twice before.i swear im not mafia-
-
omg_im_innocent_wtf Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 410
- Joined: August 14, 2006
guys its not defensive at all.
notice the word 'if'? im saying IF, hypothetically, IF, we were in a situation in which everyone wanted to lynch me, we should still discuss start first.
please read posts carefully before commenting. kinda sad that 3 ppl have now quoted that and missed that part.i swear im not mafia-
-
omg_im_innocent_wtf Goon
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
omg_im_innocent_wtf Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 410
- Joined: August 14, 2006
-
-
XReyoX Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 857
- Joined: March 3, 2007
- Location: London
-
-
XReyoX Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 857
- Joined: March 3, 2007
- Location: London
-
-
Blazerunner Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 129
- Joined: February 3, 2008
Sorry for not posting.
Well, day start has pros and cons, of course. Pro is no one starts killed without ever saying anything
Con is we have nothing to start. No cop report, no attempted doc saves, no dead body with a known role so we can predict how many of each role we have left.
About the discussion about claim-lynch, fake claim, etc. I think its quite pointless. If we expect people to fake claim, there is no telling if the one claiming is a maifa or a townie. Soo, I guess its quite random, people can just do as they will... This is my first forum game, so I may be wrong, but this is how it seems to me.
Im not voting now, as we have no clue-
-
XReyoX Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 857
- Joined: March 3, 2007
- Location: London
-
-
Norinel Not Voting (3)
- Not Voting (3)
- Not Voting (3)
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: March 2, 2003
- Location: My computer
I agree that it's a hypothetical. But the problem I had wasn't the meaning, it was the fact that you even threw it out there as a possibility at all.omg wrote:before we continue, could i please just get a quick confirmation from those that misread/misunderstood my post that you now understand it?
Although as far as the point goes, I'd say we can discuss suspicion and strategy at the same time.
Agreed. Picking out little things from strategy discussion can go a long way. Plus, we might even be able to come up with a useful strategy.XReyoX wrote:Blaze: The reason why ppl random vote at the beginning of the game is to encourage disscusion. No discussions are pointless. You could sometimes work out the real intension of the people who start or join them.-
-
Elias_the_thief He/HimNot Statistically SignificantHe/Him
- Not Statistically Significant
- Not Statistically Significant
- Posts: 3194
- Joined: August 15, 2006
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Maryland.
-
-
XReyoX Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 857
- Joined: March 3, 2007
- Location: London
-
-
Elias_the_thief He/HimNot Statistically SignificantHe/Him
- Not Statistically Significant
- Not Statistically Significant
- Posts: 3194
- Joined: August 15, 2006
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Maryland.
-
-
omg_im_innocent_wtf Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 410
- Joined: August 14, 2006
it is too hard to explain what hypothetical means. but i will summarise by saying that i didnt 'throw it out there as a possibility'. i did not at any point in that post consider that to be a possible scenario.Norinel wrote:
I agree that it's a hypothetical. But the problem I had wasn't the meaning, it was the fact that you even threw it out there as a possibility at all.omg wrote:before we continue, could i please just get a quick confirmation from those that misread/misunderstood my post that you now understand it?
Although as far as the point goes, I'd say we can discuss suspicion and strategy at the same time.
Agreed. Picking out little things from strategy discussion can go a long way. Plus, we might even be able to come up with a useful strategy.XReyoX wrote:Blaze: The reason why ppl random vote at the beginning of the game is to encourage disscusion. No discussions are pointless. You could sometimes work out the real intension of the people who start or join them.
basically consider this, the following scale represents ppl that are 100% im evil:
0 -;-----------------------------1----------2----3-----* all
now, at the time i made that post i probably thought that the level of that scale was about ;. however, i was making a general point, and thus brought up the * situation to demonstrate that regardless of where the correct point on the scale was, this general point held. i brought up the * because as you can see on the scale, if the general point holds at that point, then it also holds at points 1, 2, 3 and ;. basically by proving that even at the most extreme point it is true, i have proved that it is true at all other points on the scale, and thus no other point on the scale will need to be discussed at any time. in fact this is how hypothetical situations are often used.
do you understand now?i swear im not mafia
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-