Somewhat caught up. (MoI, replacing out voluntarily would mean I lose any attachment to the game, so... good job with an empty threat? Stop being an idiot.)
Calling me scum won't change my alignment, AngryPidgeon.
In post 1016, Eidolon wrote:Thigs i notice about tierce's iso:
- She pushed hard on me an rapid from a very early point. Not really scumhunting. Like seriously... main target being the newbs? mafia tactic 101.
- She didn't bus mae until she started taking heat from AP about her extended attack on RC after he claimed. Man, her switch to mae looks really opportunistic here. "oh well, my first lynch didn't pan out. i'll just bus my buddy instead."
- She KNOWS Seilkop's alignment with an extremely little amount of input, from the very beginning of the game. doesn't waver on this read or question seil whatsoever (Even goes so far as to omgus us all when we lynched her while she wasn't here to prevent that) another mafia 101 tactic.
You're claiming I ignored what would be a juicy town wagon on D1 (Amrun) to bus? What's even better--Amrun would have likely been the default lynch if I hadn't asked for an extension. In the meantime, no one was paying attention to Maemuki. You and Empking were both sitting on Amrun, then you waffled some, unvoted, and posted this:
In post 494, Eidolon wrote:I actually agree with some of tierce's points on maemuki and would be more inclined to lynch her though my scumread isn't extremely strong.
before shifting to Maemuki after some
D1 wagon analysis that excuses your votes in the premise that "I was voting not-with-my-scumreads." If you were sheeping your townreads, why not simply say so back then? Why the need for the posturing analysis?
You and rapidcanyon were the D1 focus from several players. The accusation of not-scumhunting is baseless and makes no sense--"the newbs"? Even if you are new to MS, you two have claimed to have an year of experience. seilkops acted much less experienced in mafia than you. And who jumped on seilkops?
You
did. Then you think he's town, arguing that his RVS disclaimer made sense in hindsight even thought you didn't like the original justification.
This was a leaning townread, and yet you push him to your second scumread
less than an hour after
he announced a V/LA.
I show this...
In post 777, Eidolon wrote:Points for me:
First to vote scum day two. unlikely to bus two scums in a row for no reason, especially when more pressure was geared at me.
Pressured scum early on day one. Unvoted amrun at the right time, got momentum off of her when i could have let my vote stay on her, and got some heat for it in the process, and then went on to vote scum.
...
is bunk, and yet you choose to ignore it in favor of soothing me in
Post 795. What's more, is that your 'went on to vote scum' is, by self-admission, not your own doing, as
Post 497 shows it's not really your decision.
Her stance on seilkops boils down to gut.
In post 807, Eidolon wrote:Seil, why am i scum?
Laugh all you want at the rc/me analysis, but nearly every post you changed your mind and your justification for why was rather shaky. first you said our interaction looked force, yet you still thought votes on me would lead to a (implied town) claim, and then you justified it by saying our old site was the reason for our interaction, but if i claimed i might just be fake claiming and it wouldn't matter.... those couple posts were straight BS and you know it. If i had to fake claim, i very likely would have been spotted.
This is very apologetic for someone addressing a scumread, it feels like she's talking to someone Eidolon is convinced is town and yet needs to lynch. And while she calls seilkops's stance contradictory, there is no indication on how that stance pushes a scum agenda.
The #870-1 sequence doesn't make sense from a townie who was apparently so willing to hear seilkops out:
In post 870, Eidolon wrote: In post 856, seilkops wrote:
Sorry, I had no idea who my person was. I wiki'd the name, saw it came from the film Dogma, and basically left it at that. I thought the name would be enough to prove I was town.
This doesn't make any sense to me. I figured mafia should know this as well. The movies are in the pm's....
but you completely ignored the point everyone has been asking about why you said your claim would clear you, and then you claim VT.
You've got to be scum
Vote: Seilkops
.
this puts him at l-1
In post 871, Eidolon wrote:Sorry. you did answer the question, it was overshadowed by the fail of a sentence in front of it... but it still doesn't make sense. why would a name clear you? wtf?
The L-1 vote seems for the lack of an explanation, then she sees seilkops has given it, and still sits on that vote. Reminds me of petapan-scum's continued vote on a player in Chain of Command after it was made clear his reason was bunk--he just shrugged and kept at it; Eidolon did the same here.
In post 883, Eidolon wrote:if seil flips scum, i will be very happy that i made it through the game w/o being lynched and was only on scum lynches.
if not then hopefully i can prove myself tomorrow.
i'll probably look over everyone's iso again, i really have no idea who else it might be.
This is very awkward twilight posting--why is Eidolon concerned that she would be a focus point Today?
The moment AngryPidgeon considered me as scum, we have this dance
In post 980, Eidolon wrote:Also, you say i'm scum for not going after tierce, but i did slight fos tierce yesterday and her response to me seemed townie enough to where i dropped it. Basically, if she makes it to mylo/lylo, she should be looked at very thoroughly. and i would like her to post more, because we don't have much to work with if that does happen, plus she might have good leads if she is town, which i've tried to get from her today.
And i think we should def. wait to hear more from her today before lynching anyone.
In post 1002, AngryPidgeon wrote:Bombshells everywhere tonight!
VOTE: Tierce
I think its her. I really actually do. Similar reasons that I did on D1. Plus I learned fairly recently that scum bussing D1 is totally heard of.
[snip]
Seriously. I've been strugglung with this game Day because I can see town sides of Amrun, Eid, DW even if they had some scummy things. You know who isn't giving me any town vibes? Tierce. She bussed Maemuki.
In post 1003, Eidolon wrote: In post 1001, AngryPidgeon wrote:What if its Tierce? Just gonna drop that bombshell on everyone. And yes I've been contributing to my other games way more than here. Don't care. Yall are lurkers. Im going to ISO her tomorrow. DW too.
I said that yesterday and got sh!t for it.
I mean, the thing is, seems like if a mafia has a plan set, they would bus their buddy with full force.
Motivation isn't strong for a day 1 lynch that could have been a townie, but it's a possibility.
In post 1004, Eidolon wrote:[snip]
Btw, i still think it's possible that you are scum, and these questions are leading to get all the townies thinking that tierce is scum for holding the game up.
But i also have reasons to think deas is scum.
Guess who Eidolon is going to try to lynch in MyLo/LyLo should I get lynched today? Starts with Angry, ends with Pidgeon.
In post 1005, AngryPidgeon wrote:Heh, I really think its her. I'm reading through her D1 ISO (which admittedly I found scummy at the time, so big shocker that I still find it scummy) and I can't find really any reason to give her town points. At all.
DW's wagon analysis looks town. Plus I just don't see him as scum. I really don't think he is. Eidolon? Her zyrc interactions were bussy looking, but her "Oh maybe I'll vote Zyrc but not now" is honestly too scummy to come from a buddy. It just is. Amrun is well...Amrun. I don't think its her either. Partly cause Empking was on her wagon a lot D1 and Zyrc RVS'd her. Also I really just don't get huge scum vibes from her; just really mild town ones. Tierce? Scum. I was giving her too much of a pass for the D1 Maemuki bus, but its gotta be her. I swear by my golden Scumdar that never runs out of batteries that its her.
P-edit: Thanks
I swear Im not scum though. Honest to god I have not seen a single scum card on this site. I literally do not roll scum. My issue is that I really had to force some reads on you, DW, Amrun today because I don't have any strong ones. I really don't. I kept trying to PoE it down (MoI is pretty much conftown) and look for the scummiest, but I see towntells from all of you at various points. It really comes down to Tierce who has been getting a free pass and lurking around the thread.
I keep oscillating on which of the three of you (amrun, DW, Eid) it could be and I think that is because it isn't. Right now Im leaning Amrun again, but why? It certainly isn't because she has done anything enormously scummy.
DW's wagon analysis is a pretty good towntell.
Eid's Unvote + I may vote zyrc later post is a towntell.
Amrun doesn't have any super towntells but I think her Empking/Mae interactions + the VCs make her probably town.
Tierce? Has done nothing to make me think she is town other than bus Maemuki.
In post 1006, Eidolon wrote:Now that you say it, i really do think you could be right. i think i said something yesterday to the degree of "tierce is coasting through the game due to her mae bus"
At any rate, I'll get behind this push. Tierce is the one slot that hasn't had much input since day 1, so I think she deserves some pressure.
Vote: Tierce.
And yeah, she mentioned a busy schedule, and i understand that, i really do. But when you have time to come in and post coaching type things about claims, you obviously have read enough to where you can offer SOME OPINIONS ON YOUR SCUMSPECTS.
AP doesn't need any more buddies. Especially with such a nice setup to turn on him tomorrow should I get lynched.
VOTE: Eidolon
In post 1012, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Actually why not
[massclaim]
at this stage? We have flips of Tracker / Bodyguard / VTs versus Goon / Goon with my claim and Angry’s claim out there. Odds are more than favorable that we don’t have ANOTHER protective role given Quilford’s death and I very much doubt we have any other significant roles at all. Cop doesn’t make sense even with a Godfather.
And given the game-state tomorrow is likely to be a No Lynch so a Mass claim would come out at that point anyway.
I admit my wording is weird. The thing was that people were randomly claiming--the "we are not massclaiming" bit was "we are not going through massclam"--it was not a stance of "we are NOT going to do it", it was "this is not an organized massclaim, this is people claiming randomly, please stop it". If there is going to be a massclaim, I'd like to see that request coming from someone who is essentially cleared: i.e. you.
DeasWave... I'm far more comfortable reading Deas than Delta, and the latter seems to be behind the majority of the posts. Deas is a decent player, but I'm not too keen in Delta in general--it's the kind of player whose case-making abilities don't really look for scumminess, regardless of DW's alignment. I need to reread it a bit more and try to focus on Deas's motivations.
In post 942, DeasWave wrote:Anyway, we discussed Amrun and decided that the three or four (not a "million") side-reasons we had for suspecting her were probably nothing, and the one main reason was Amrun possibly protecting Mae with her vote on our wagon. After some deliberation we decided that this wasn't strong either, since it wouldn't have actually saved Mae and it's doubtful that Amrun would stick her neck out so far for her buddy who was already an inch away from eating rope. We had decided that the scum thing for her to do would have been to go after IceGuy, not us.
While I appreciate (and understand) that you're keeping your hydra discussions outside the thread, why do we rarely get to see reasons for your reads when they change? There is a lot of a posterori explanation. I'll grant you that it all seems to match so far to a point in which I'm not use for Delta's scum play, i.e. that you're actually referring back to your discussions, but that is all the more reason for you to provide public opinions on events as they happen. Please? (Paging Deas... Paging Deas...)
In post 915, AngryPidgeon wrote:Scum Eid is setting herself up for sheep accusations and a big OMGUS from me (which I think she would expect). I really dont see her risking getting into a firefight with me so early as scum Today.
If Eidolon is scum, she has to deal with you sooner rather than later. You're one of the most vocal players, MoI has his claim making him town, I'm obvtown--who is Eidolon going to push now to ensure she still has viable mislynches later? This is a point in the game in which if she's scum, she can no longer afford to avoid certain players.
This confuses me. I don't see a need for you to ask a player why your townread is town.
In post 971, Amrun wrote: In post 969, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Why do you read him (AngryP) as Town, if I may ask? I don’t see anything that says “obv-Town” in his ISO and his “Oh, Amrun isn’t obv-Town” and “MoI you are scummy but your claim makes sense … anyone else want to claim a PR and make me able to widen my mislynch net” posts today are really, really scummy.
The way he said he wouldn't vote for Maemuki even if the alternative was a no lynch. That's risky for scum.
This. It was a really weird refuse to bus--it was a very risky maneuver that might result in flipped scum-Maemuki and atention flying immediately to AngryPidgeon. I've actually seen this happen--Isa refused to bus Thor and became rather obvious scum in the process--but it's a very risky stance.
In addition, AP seems to really want the push the game into movement. 1) He's really pushing for activity, and 2) The way his reads have been shifting today is fluid--while he is considering almost everyone, it reads as thorough analysis of the game coming from town. I've been in that state of massive paranoia in Weather Mafia II.
In post 1013, AngryPidgeon wrote:Also
[Tierce's]
push
[on Maemuki]
gave her super towncred and
made me look really bad
because I had been FoSing her heavily up to that point in the game.
No? I've been calling you Town, and Amrun has the same opinion for similar reasons. You don't look bad at all.