In post 1097, Oblivion wrote:
In post 1094, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 1084, Oblivion wrote:
You're not openly forthcoming. Your cards are held and it is trying to hack your brain and you're denying it. That is how it feels.
I am used to the average impression of me being that I am someone who dumps all thoughts into the thread. So this is certainly a novel take.
From my POV, it feels like you asked me a question that is functionally not answerable, and then view me as being stubborn by not answering. I think we have fundamentally different ways of thinking about other players, and that is just a barrier that exists that is independent to my willingness to share my thoughts.
Perhaps. May it attempt to explain one more time what it is looking for?
From what I gathered, you wanted me to write out my mental model on those players. But I don't generally think of players in particularly concrete ways, such that I can just whip out a solid description.
My mental models are amorphous, ephemeral, shifting. I take a gaseous mental model, and place it into a solid container of context, and only then does it start having a true shape.
If I were to try to nail down a more generic mental model, devoid of the containers, on any of the players, I would probably need a week per player, and I would likely have to back reading multiple games to get my bearings.
If you have specific questions, I am happy to try to answer, but if you leave it as open ended as you did, and it feels like you are asking for my Treatise de Fferyllt (or Cabd, or Pooky), it is not something that I am capable of producing for you.