A look at fhq:
Post 0: (That other game went swimmingly didn't it?)
Post 1: Cites wolf's "cop"-logic error. (save) IGMEOYs the miller
2: Comment to miller about the miller (null)
3: Ignorance (?) about the miller
4: Uses miller quote to FoS wolf (that's interesting, or bandwagony), then votes Lowell
5: Accuses Lowell of being too macho, but unvotes Lowell
6: Chaos happens because wolf did not understand "QFT"
7: crywolf is new, Lowell has a poor meta
8: asks Lowell a question about wolf
9: Lowell's meta still poor, wolf needs to explain herself
10: Non-serious comment
11: likes Oman, Lowell must claim, crywolf lurks, response to Ythill
12: Darox conundrum is null, Lowell is scummy despite meta
13: Lowell's votes suck
14: asks Darox about Lowell's scumminess or poor meta
15: Darox's unvote (as opposed to others?) is fishy
16:
fhqwhgads wrote:Darox wrote:The case against me is highly amusing.
Does anyone have something other than that I don't want to see Lowell dead right away but I do want him to say more?
Was that the case?
I thought the case was that you seemed to think his play style is scummy, yet refused to remove your vote at L-1.
Now that he is at L-1 again, you suddenly do remove the vote, contradicting your previous argument of 'what is wrong with being at L-1'?
Also, this isn't the first time in this game that Lowell is it L-1. What makes you think the strategy is going to make him talk this time?
Funny how fhq's post 16 outclasses the day 2 cases against Darox.
17: Darox unvote is still scummy
18: Lowell is uncooperative
19: Rash called out fhq for not explaining fhq's reaction to Darox well enough, fhq admitted it was lacking (Ythill should remember this)
20: Lowell's meta is no longer an excuse, Darox defense is a joke, Lowell Lynch supporter
21: lynch better than no-lynch (yep, look at day 3 too), talks about majority voting (Rashiminos reminds himself to make a comment.)
22:
fhqwhgads wrote:Darox wrote:
No, it is scummy to support a lynch because you think it's the only one that will be supported.
Nice piece of statement twisting there yourself. I believe I have made my point (by the way, my 'statement twisting' question was just a question. I never implied that is what you meant. I just asked it to illustrate why I made the point at all).
Deja vu +2.
23: Meta is no excuse (I'd have to disagree, but that's a thread topic by itself.)
24: votes Darox since Lowell is quiet, Darox is still a joke
25: Darox wanted Lowell to claim, but dismissed the lynch threat behind it, this oddity makes Darox scummy
26: pro-semantics, esp. "Claim or Die" [:)]
27: I'd be lynching Lowell if he were here, but Darox is fine.
28: Lowell must claim, or die.
29: ditto
30: Lack of claim means dead Lowell (Good work).
31: Dang, didn't hammer.
So ends day 1.
There are connections to wolf, and not so much to other living players. Some minor things in both directions, nothing to base a decision on.
As for following the majority versus reaching a majority, I feel it's better if everyone can find a separate reason to believe someone is scummy, rather than throwing their vote to someone else's cause, trusting that someone else. Better that all roads lead to the scum's front door rather than for everyone to follow one scumtrail to a dead end.
An installment of Oman's shorter day 1 is upcoming.