Execution Mafia GAMEOVER!

[Amrun]

TS, Exe wasn't the one who said that. He basically accused me of sheeping, which I clearly was not.

vezo accused me of the opposite, which is still absolutely baffling to me.

@Exe: Your last post is a perfect example of a post with confusing syntax. Is the post addressed to me? If so, WHY is it addressed to me and why didn't you indicate that? If it's not, then why did you refer to TS as "he" and to me as "you" when I wasn't even involved? That post makes very little sense and the only reason I can somewhat decipher it is because it is so short. When you post walls entirely full of such confusion, it's unintelligible.


I agree with TS's statement about StrungOver. More content plz.

p-edit: Excuse me, HC? I voted in my first post.

[Haschel Cedricson]

Sorry, when I said "Votes" what I really meant was "Votes for Exe".

[Amrun]

What about my posts makes you think I'm even remotely inclined to vote for Exe?

[Shattered Viewpoint]

Haschel, we will gain nothing by immediately electing an executioner. It can wait.

Stop it, your scummy is showing.

[Amrun]

Eh, even though I disagree with electing an executioner now, it isn't inherently scummy. The execution itself would not be immediate.

In all honesty, I'd rather focus on scumhunting and then simply elect someone to do the killing who thinks that killing our target is a good idea. That seems a lot more natural and fruitful.

[Haschel Cedricson]

Haschel, we will gain nothing by immediately electing an executioner. It can wait.

Stop it, your scummy is showing.

On the contrary, we gain everything.

Stop it, your ability to think things through is showing.

[Haschel Cedricson]

Damn it, I meant to say "fail to think things through". Now I look retarded.

[Shattered Viewpoint]

Amrun, hypothesize with me for a moment. Say we elect Exe RIGHT NOW THISVERYMINUTE and, as we're discussing who to execute, Exe makes a slip and outs himself as obvscum?

Yes, we can elect too soon. And I won't have any of it.

[Haschel Cedricson]

Amrun, hypothesize with me for a moment. Say we elect Exe RIGHT NOW THISVERYMINUTE and, as we're discussing who to execute, Exe makes a slip and outs himself as obvscum?

Yes, we can elect too soon. And I won't have any of it.

Then we kill him at night, or failing that, the next day. 1-for-1 exchanges hurt the scum more than they hurt us.

[Haschel Cedricson]

Alternately, we could elect charter executioner instead. If he's scum, he's very unlikely to make a slip on the first day, so your scenario won't come up. Would that make you feel better?

(I'm not saying that you would do this, Exe, but charter is the only other person I've played with before.)

[Amrun]

Amrun, hypothesize with me for a moment. Say we elect Exe RIGHT NOW THISVERYMINUTE and, as we're discussing who to execute, Exe makes a slip and outs himself as obvscum?

Yes, we can elect too soon. And I won't have any of it.

If that were the case, then presumably, what led him to the obvscum slip would be the sense of security he felt. In the end, that would be a gain for us as we got a definite witch, which we can then kill for our nightkill. (Haha, witch which)

I don't promote the idea of choosing an executioner right now myself, but I don't think having a difference in philosophy with someone makes that person scum. I can see the town motivation in it.

[Exe]

So Haschel, who do you think should die?

[Exe]

@Exe: Your last post is a perfect example of a post with confusing syntax. Is the post addressed to me? If so, WHY is it addressed to me and why didn't you indicate that? If it's not, then why did you refer to TS as "he" and to me as "you" when I wasn't even involved? That post makes very little sense and the only reason I can somewhat decipher it is because it is so short. When you post walls entirely full of such confusion, it's unintelligible.

Isn't it obvious who wasn't reading the thread? I mean, really, come on. You're just reaching now. The context makes my post perfectly understandable.

[Exe]

Amrun, hypothesize with me for a moment. Say we elect Exe RIGHT NOW THISVERYMINUTE and, as we're discussing who to execute, Exe makes a slip and outs himself as obvscum?

Yes, we can elect too soon. And I won't have any of it.

Also, I'd be happy to give scum the executioner role if they slip up with it.

Can everyone post a top Suspect in a visible manner? I wanna see how things are shaping up.

[Exe]

Amrun, hypothesize with me for a moment. Say we elect Exe RIGHT NOW THISVERYMINUTE and, as we're discussing who to execute, Exe makes a slip and outs himself as obvscum?

Yes, we can elect too soon. And I won't have any of it.

Also, I'd be happy to give scum the executioner role if they slip up with it.

Can everyone post a top Suspect in a visible manner? I wanna see how things are shaping up.

[Shattered Viewpoint]

My #1 is still Umbrage.

[Haschel Cedricson]

Right now my number one choice of kill would be

twistedspoon

. Partially for reasons everybody else has mentioned, partially for his sudden shift into a Godwin Corollary defense, and partially for the general feel of flailing that I'm getting from his posts.

Secondary choice is Umbrage but that's a contingent read on a scum TS, so that's not as powerful.

By the by, I recommend that we put our choice of execution in blue so that Exe can notice it more easily.

[Umbrage]

@ Exe: Either shut up or get out. You've slipped from the best player in the game to the worst.

Players who are scummy:

charter
Shattered Viewpoint
vezokpiraka
CooLDoG

Players who are town:

Umbrage (duh)
Amrun
Twistedspoon
Final Fires
Ant_to_the_max

Players who need a slap to the face:

Exe
Haschel Cedricson
Tragedy
StrungOver

At this point, there is no way I am giving my vote to Exe. We need someone who isn't likely to fly off the handle and/or abuse their power. Exe is too egotistical, too unpredictable. As for who I do want as an executioner, well I would be my first choice, but failing that either Amrun or Twistedspoon.

I admit I may have been wrong about vezok. I'll have to look into him.

@ Haschel: Hey, why don't you go form the Exe Fan Club, and leave the rest of us to play the game? OK? Good.

@ Tragedy: Are you playing this game or not? Make a choice.

[Tragedy]

@Umbrage: I just came back from school just now and gotta pick up my bros.
More content later, but YOU.
You're just trying to distance yourself away since I have no content yet..
BRB.

[Umbrage]

This post is all about: vezokpiraka

At first, I didn't think that infamous quote was an attempt at rolefishing. But then I found this beauty in his very first post:

Also before we decide on who to execute I think we should wait for a claim.

So, I think it's safe to say that vezok has only one thing on his mind: who the PRs are.

This quote supports the theory:

I asked that question because I wanted to see a reaction and something else. I won't tell what that something else is.

Then why haven't you commented on the reaction you got? It seems to me that that would be the first thing you'd do upon getting the reaction you were looking for, share your results. Otherwise, what good does it do? You don't say what reaction you were looking for or why it is important. Instead, you post this:

I really don't like how amrun is trying to appear so original for the sake originality. I looks like scum trying to stand out from the crowd. I don't know why they would do that but that is what it makes me think of.

What is the difference between scum trying to stand out from the crowd and town trying to stand out from the crowd? How does standing out from the crowd help scum? Usually they want to blend in. You are qualifying your scum read by implying it's more of a gut instinct, which is basically a back door.

Wait! What?
How did I sheep this game SV?

I didn't even vote someone.

In his very next post:

unvote
vote Exe

So much for your defence.

The one thing that makes me hesitate from saying vezok is scum is his blatant sheeping and buddying toward Exe. It looks like genuine confused town.

Thoughts?

[Haschel Cedricson]

@ Haschel: Hey, why don't you go form the Exe Fan Club, and leave the rest of us to play the game? OK? Good.

I've got a better idea. Why don't you go form the Let's Waste A Fuckton Of Time Arguing About Who Should Be The Executioner Club, and leave the rest of us to focus on the important aspects of the game?

[Umbrage]

Important aspects? Like spamming VOTE X NAO?

Can you at least admit that his play has taken a hell of a dive? I don't even know WHY you want Exe to kill someone. Or who you want him to kill.

[Twistedspoon]

and partially for the general feel of flailing that I'm getting from his posts.

If I wanted to flail there's a nice button below the tab key that i'd use

I agree with TS's statement about StrungOver.

Indeed, the one thing we cannot afford is a player to slip under the radar

Can everyone post a top Suspect in a visible manner? I wanna see how things are shaping up.

no prizes for guessing mine

Exe makes a slip and outs himself as obvscum?

Does this mean you suspect Exe more now?

I don't want to invoke Godwin's Law, so I'll compare him to Stalin instead.

This is hilarious. (I am also writing an essay on Lenin/Kerensky right now, so this is doubly amusing)

lol, that wasn't how I put it, but points for comedic exploitation. It's quite funny when you put it that way.

@Umbrage: Why don't you go form the Let's Waste A Fuckton Of Time Arguing About Who Should Be The Executioner Club, and leave the rest of us to focus on the important aspects of the game?

I'd have said that the executioner was an important aspect since they choose who lives and dies, and are trusted with much power. I assume you're more interested with talking about who should be executed though from your post. It's the decision between executer and executed that's important. Which to we delegate more time towards deciding? A case could be made for executor since they are decided by the whole town, whereas the executed is completely down to the executor themselves and could entirely ignore who the town believe should get the chop. However, In the end it's the executions that decide the play of the game and which side take the lead.


I really think Exe suits the colour red. I'd very much like it if you statred to post in red, Exe

To finish off, I want to hear the suspicions of Final Fires, Cool Dog and StrungOver. Especially Final fires since he looks to be a contender for the executioner role.
At the moment I don't know what to think of Vezo and Tragedy. To be honest, I haven't really had a chance to study or think about them with all the mess dumped on myself

[Amrun]

Aw, Umbrage, I was compiling a case on vezok and you ruined it. That's okay, though, since I was going to say basically the same thing.

It's obvious that my number one suspect is still vezok.

@tragedy: Content soon or your stalling will be a scumtell.

@Exe: If you can't figure out why that post was not good English, then I'll be happy to give you some English lessons. It will be good practice for when I become an English teacher. We SHOULD NOT have to spend five minutes figuring out the basic content of a one-line post. Context should not be relied on so heavily. You muddled your antecedents and treating it so flippantly is annoying. Having genuine trouble is permissable, but don't pretend your posts are crystal clear when they're not.

[Haschel Cedricson]

Right, I have to head off to class now, so I won't be around until much later this evening. But before I go, I want to make one thing clear.

It does not matter who the executioner is. At all.

The executioner is only going to execute who we tell them to execute. If they execute somebody else, then we kill them as soon as possible. Every moment we spend arguing about who should have the honor of actually typing "Execute: [WHO THE TOWN CHOSE] is a moment we are not arguing about who to execute, and that is by far the more important question. The quicker we do that, the quicker we can start discussing night scenarios. There are four questions we need to answer every day. Of those four, three of them are of crucial importance. The fourth is a formality, and we should take care of it as soon as possible.

I chose Exe because he seemed reasonably pro-town. If we make him the executioner and he is scum, that doesn't matter as long as he kills who we tell him to. If he doesn't, then we kill him. There are literally no downsides here. If you guys don't want Exe to be the executioner, then pick somebody else, and I'll vote for them as soon as it's a majority. But let's do it right now.

If we haven't elected an executioner in 24 hours, then everybody who obstructs that process is going to shoot right up my scumlist.