Empking wrote:Would you mind explaining how that first example was not him blatantly implying something in order to be able to use his pet phrase "I didn't say that"?
This is how I interprated it:
Empking: What allignment is so afraid of 1 (one) vote that they wagon the largest wagon and try and discredit the person voting them?
Neil1113: The largest wagon? 2 votes? =
You consider two votes to be a large bandwagon?
My interpratation: I don't think he was questioning your statement that you were the largest bandwagon, but questioning why you think he would feel the need to join the largest bandwagon when it was only two votes in this case.
Empking: You don't think it was the largest wagon.
My interpratation: You thought he was denying that you were the largest bandwagon, when, in actuality, he was simply saying that he didn't think your bandwagon was as large as he thought you were making it out to be.
Neil1113: I didn't say that.
My interpratation: He didn't say that, it was just how you interprated it.
I'm pretty sure that's the misunderstanding.
Empking wrote:Can you also give a town motivation for him refusing to answer my question while trying to pretend as if he had?
Which question are you talking about?
MagnaofIllusion wrote:@HezLucky – so nothing to say at all regarding the entire pages of Empking versus Neil posting?
Any particular reason why you didn't ask Sloth or zMuffinMan this question?
Also, Magna, what do you think of cjdrum?
MagnaofIllusion wrote:So let me get your logic straight here …
1. Twisted in pre-game expressed a desire to RVS neil for his fake-post about not understanding certain Mafia aspects.
2. You and I explained to him that was a bad tactic for scum to take pre-game
3. Twisted eventually grudgingly agrees.
4. Twisted votes someone else RVS when the game opens.
5. You vote him for it.
That’s what you are basing your point 1 on?
Not quite. I don't think #3 actually happened. This was Twistedspoon's last post before the game actually began:
Twistedspoon wrote:1) nothing, how could it?
There's no way to tell for certain that it's a gambit. However it makes a very respectable RVS wagon
2) I'm not sure If it'd be the best thing. Magna seems to think not. I'd have done it to distance myself from the scum faction were I scum
3) I've reconsidered and I think it's shoddy evidence now that I remember random.org has been used to generate the roles. I doubt our mod would take role requests, especially ones that were posted in the open queue for all to see :p
And the only post after this, but before his random vote was this:
Twistedspoon wrote:1) i don't know neil's meta
2) well i wasn't going to lynch him based on that fact, only an RVS wagon. But hey, feel free to suspect me should I try that tactic. I can't help feeling that I'd have dug my own grave though
He doesn't say in either of these posts that he isn't going to vote Neil for an RVS wagon. He also doesn't give any reason for changing his mind when he random votes either.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Also Wicked – why do think of Empking’s vote for Neil given that it ostensibly had the same reason as Twisted’s early suspicion (see post 28 for context)?
I don't think Empking ever gave the reason for his original vote. If he did, can you quote it please? If that was why he voted Neil, I don't find it suspicious.
Empking, have you ever seen scum blatantly defend their buddy? If so, can you post a link, please?
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr