Wow, that was quite an answer. No, that was outstanding. OK I believe you, you were distracted. As for the Mafia Grapher I really like it (I have a couple of suggestions if you are interested).
Personally I am very keen on analysis, however over time I have learnt that analysis on its own, doesn’t work. On top of analysis you need to go with your gut and intuitions and look for those slight subtleties that analysis will never pick up. [Hey this is only an opinion so if you disagree with it that is fine by me, and anyway I think you should keep up with the MG].
Anyway, let me point out one of the subtleties that you missed (you were probably still to distracted):
First you did make a defence (post#108):
Ah, just it clicked and I checked, the quote that is not a quote. Didn't have my PM memorized word-for-word.
Now in my opinion I thought that it was a very good defence. And as such a good play on your part.
But Kleimar didn’t get it:
I would like to join the Malaprop bandwagon but given the amount of votes he has I will FOS him instead. I want to hear a defence first.
Kleimar did not think that you had made a defence!! Which means that Kleimar is ‘out of the loop’.
But instead of pointing this out you went and made a second defence (post#113). This second defence in my opinion was one of your bad plays (1 out of the 4 that I hinted to). For a start if players haven’t got it by now (and I would have thought that the scum would have got it straight away – but I’ll post about that later) they certainly have got it now. Also . . . actually I’m not going to say, but there were other points in your second defence which I didn’t like.
If I were you, all I would have done was FOS:Kleimar and say something like, “Kleimar why don’t you think I (Malaprop) made a defence in post#108?”