Newbie 1068 (Town Wins!)

Kcdaspot · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:19 pm

WING on the other hand seems over anxious to spill blood.

what i mean about fatso is: he just may have simply read his role pm, clicked the link into the thread, and began posting WITHOUT reading the first few posts.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:20 pm

also i'm not voting because i'm not confident in a vote right now.

re reading.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:25 pm

VOTE: wing

this is the best lynch now.

"1)Hi. 2)I'm not really interested in getting that vote off, 3)I'm more interested in getting it on scum. I will be contributing more from now forward, I haven't been here. Sorry."

1) "OH SHIT YOU VOTED ME"
2) "I DON'T GIVE A DAMN THAT YOU VOTED ME"
3) "LOOKLOOKLOOK SEE? I'M TOWN!!!!!! "

scum trying to hard to be town.

CLASSIC scumtell

MaxKojote · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:47 pm

Glad to see you agree. I guess I should put forward a vote since all I;m doing is pointing a myriad of fingers of various levels of suspicion. Seeing as you are very eager for a quick lynch, Wing, shall we start with you?

VOTE: WingDamage9001

zoraster · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Sat Feb 26, 2011 3:37 pm

Day 1 Vote Count

MaxKojote ( 0 )

(L - 5 )

Fatso ( 1 ) WingDamage9001,

(L - 4 )

Kcdaspot ( 1 ) }|{opa,

(L - 4 )

neil1113 ( 0 )

(L - 5 )

Nobody Special ( 1 ) RayFrost,

(L - 4 )

RayFrost ( 0 )

(L - 5 )

WingDamage9001 ( 2 ) Kcdaspot, MaxKojote,

(L - 3 )

Shanman ( 0 )

(L - 5 )

}|{opa ( 1 ) neil1113,

(L - 4 )

No Lynch ( 0 )

(L - 5 )

Not Voting ( 3 ) Shanman, Fatso, Nobody Special,
Total Votes ( 9 )

Deadline: March 17th at 19:00 EST
With 9 able to vote, 5 needed to lynch.

WingDamage9001 · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Sat Feb 26, 2011 4:52 pm

MaxKojote wrote:Glad to see you agree. I guess I should put forward a vote since all I;m doing is pointing a myriad of fingers of various levels of suspicion. Seeing as you are very eager for a quick lynch, Wing, shall we start with you?

VOTE: WingDamage9001

When did I call for a lynch? I didn't realize scumhunting was scummy.

RayFrost · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Sat Feb 26, 2011 4:55 pm

Not replying to people's response to your attack on fatso and instead making a shallow defense against

one person

that's called you scummy is scummy.

FoS: WD9001

- suspicion level is OVER 9000!

NS needs to reply to what I've said to him, though.

Jora · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:29 am

neil1113 wrote:Answer my questions. I don't like how you've been avoiding them so far, and I hope you understand silly accusations like yours will not just "slide by" but they will be noted, and commented on.

Sorry, what questions? I re-read all your's posts and dont find any questions adressed to me.

neil1113 · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:33 am

Wing please make a valid defense. And as far as calling for a quick lynch, I believe KCD meant you jumped on a bandwagon without very much reasoning at all. When you hop on a wagon, or when you place a vote down on somebody that others are finding suspicious, the idea of a lynch isn't so far off. In that case, for you to put a vote down is in essence, you agreeing to lynch that person because he/she is scum.

KCD, please answer his question anyway. When did he call for a quick lynch?

Opa, ignore me. I realized the questions were directed towards Frost, not you. So Frost, please address the following post:

Oh and UNVOTE: OPA

neil1113 · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 2:34 am

neil1113 wrote:That said, Frost could you re-explain to me why you're slightly suspicious of myself? Because I agreed with someones post, and apologized for misrepresenting someone? Do I understand that correctly? If so, I have two questions for you.

1. How is apologizing for misrepresenting someone (my re:kcd) scum motivated, in any way?
2. How is agreeing with a point that someone else has made, "slightly" more scum motivated then town?

RayFrost · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 3:06 am

Thought I'd replied to that, but I see I haven't yet.

1. Not really scum motivated, and that's not what I said. Misrepresentation is scum motivated. Apologizing for it is null.

2. The

ease in which you did so

on a

minor

point without really going into more depth is my issue. Reads like an attempt to strengthen an argument without really devoting to it.

Fatso · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 7:08 am

Hmmm... Just did some re-reading and:

FoS: WingDamage9001

FoMS: Kcdaspot

(for hopping around a lot. I suppose we all do that sometimes though.)

WingDamage9001 · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 7:48 am

MaxKojote wrote: FOS: WingDamage9001

Been reading through the topic, Wing's eagerness to get a lynch done practically screams "I want to kill someone!", possibly followed silently by "And I wanna kill someone else tonight!". Mafia is not a game about speed, until you're approaching the deadline and still have no-one set as a lynch. Probability-wise, we have the higher chance of lynching a member of the town, so a speedlynch is likely to hit them. The eagerness to run into that without first drawing out information and reactions from people suggests a more scummy mindset from someone not willing to let the town get a chance to gather information.

First, why FOS when you have a vote? It's like you're trying to get others to vote for you. Second, once again, I don't want a lynch. I want information, and votes get that. My vote was on a BW, and on purpose. I want to hear more from Fatso. So your point is moot, as I am trying to pull out information. If Fatso were to hit L-2 or so, I would unvote if the case weren't strong enough yet.

Fatso · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:04 am

What's "L-2?"

Fatso · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:04 am

Oh, never mind. I figured it out.

Shanman · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:05 am

Fatso wrote:Hmmm... Just did some re-reading and:

FoS: WingDamage9001

FoMS: Kcdaspot
(for hopping around a lot. I suppose we all do that sometimes though.)

Well thank you for giving your opinions about these people, but how about some rational? You gave a reason for Kcdaspot, (which you yourself said was weak), but why did you FoS WingDamage9001? It seems like OMGUS finger pointing.

MaxKojote · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:24 am

WingDamage9001 wrote:
MaxKojote wrote: FOS: WingDamage9001

Been reading through the topic, Wing's eagerness to get a lynch done practically screams "I want to kill someone!", possibly followed silently by "And I wanna kill someone else tonight!". Mafia is not a game about speed, until you're approaching the deadline and still have no-one set as a lynch. Probability-wise, we have the higher chance of lynching a member of the town, so a speedlynch is likely to hit them. The eagerness to run into that without first drawing out information and reactions from people suggests a more scummy mindset from someone not willing to let the town get a chance to gather information.
First, why FOS when you have a vote? It's like you're trying to get others to vote for you. Second, once again, I don't want a lynch. I want information, and votes get that. My vote was on a BW, and on purpose. I want to hear more from Fatso. So your point is moot, as I am trying to pull out information. If Fatso were to hit L-2 or so, I would unvote if the case weren't strong enough yet.

Chronology, dear. That post occurred before my vote.

In addition, your original vote on the guy put him at L-2. So would you like to try again?

In addition to

that

, "I wanna win this. Now." suggests a will to rush. Yes it could have been meaningless fluff, but this is Mafia. Almost all of what you say will be used against you at some point in time. It could have been Town, hoping for a quick end, it could have been Scum, hoping for a quick lynch.

If you're trying to scumhunt, you're not really doing a good job at it. You seem more to be playing follow the leader than doing any actual hunting of your own.

Fatso · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:27 am

@Shanman: That was for seeming over eager. Basically what several others have said.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:40 am

neil1113 wrote: KCD, please answer his question anyway. When did he call for a quick lynch?

who said he called for one?

I said he was hoping for one.

and now he's panicking.

WingDamage9001 · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:41 am

Fatso wrote:@Shanman: That was for seeming over eager. Basically what several others have said.

This is why Fatso is scum supreme. It's barning at its best(worst).

Fatso · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:47 am

I'm not barning, I just happen to agree on this point. There's a difference.

WingDamage9001 · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:02 am

Fatso wrote:I'm not barning, I just happen to agree on this point. There's a difference.

There is a difference, but you aren't doing the right thing. Without offering your own opinions and explanations, you're barning. And right now, you're barning.

Fatso · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:10 am

How can I offer a different opinion from other people's when my opinion IS THE SAME? Just because I'm the last one to put it out there doesn't make it barning.

WingDamage9001 · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:57 am

Your opinion doesn't have to be different. Just say things in your own words. This is advice for the future for you. It helps everyone if you do, because everyone can understand everyone better.

WingDamage9001 · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:00 am

MaxKojote wrote:Glad to see you agree. I guess I should put forward a vote since all I;m doing is pointing a myriad of fingers of various levels of suspicion. Seeing as you are very eager for a quick lynch, Wing, shall we start with you?

VOTE: WingDamage9001

This post feels very town to me, other than the voting me part

It offers clear explanations, and there's no attempt to hide things. Now compare this to a Fatso post. There's a difference. Fatso is scummy.