Mini 228 - Smash Brothers - GAME OVER

rajrhcpfreak · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:38 pm

no i think the vig killed Assasin.

no evidence, just speculation.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:24 pm

I've been assigned a fairly long and difficult paper to write; it's doubtful I'll be of much use until Thursday. I'll try on my little mental recesses.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:55 am

Day 2 First Vote Count

2 Chaos - inHimshallibe, Iammars
2 Bacde - Bacde, Chaos

Not voting: armlx, PBuG, rajrhcpfreak, SinisterOverlord, Someone

With

9

alive, it's

5

to lynch.

SinisterOverlord · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Tue Sep 20, 2005 3:05 am

Hm. Seems we're not getting any clues about the killing groups from the nightscene...

I also personally would think we're more likely to have an SK than a vig (though it could be both, and a doc got off a protect - maybe on Bacde?).

Re: yesterday, sorry about that. It happens to me sometimes... I get busy with stuff. In retrospect, I probably should've unvoted, and at least let you guys know.. well, we all screw up sometimes.

rajrhcpfreak · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Tue Sep 20, 2005 4:26 am

ok.

i dont understand.

i thought Bacde was pretty much confirmed, atleast in my mind.

so i have to

Vote: Chaos

armlx · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Tue Sep 20, 2005 4:41 am

Vote Chaos

He was next on my list of suspicion yesterday. Nothing else to say.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:54 am

4 out of 5. Defense?

Bacde · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:53 pm

SinisterOverlord wrote:Hm. Seems we're not getting any clues about the killing groups from the nightscene...

I also personally would think we're more likely to have an SK than a vig (though it could be both, and a doc got off a protect - maybe on Bacde?).

Re: yesterday, sorry about that. It happens to me sometimes... I get busy with stuff. In retrospect, I probably should've unvoted, and at least let you guys know.. well, we all screw up sometimes.

Why it just so happens that I WAS protected from nightkills last night. Seems pretty suspicious to me that you even brought up the idea that someone might have targetted me last night.

FoS: SinisterOverlord

Iammars · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:13 pm

Ehh... We know you have a self-protect ability, so it's not that far of a stretch to think that.

SinisterOverlord · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:48 pm

Bacde wrote:Why it just so happens that I WAS protected from nightkills last night. Seems pretty suspicious to me that you even brought up the idea that someone might have targetted me last night.

Logically, the most probable thing for scum/SK/whatever to do would be to kill off the one claimed, potentially quite powerful protown role. Equally logically, it makes sense for a doc to protect the one claimed, potentially quite powerful protown role. Add the self-protect ability into the equation, it's not an unreasonable thought.

Chaos · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Tue Sep 20, 2005 3:18 pm

I am

Donkey Kong

. My roletype is

Roleblocker

.

So yeah,

I roleblocked Iammer's last night

, as he looked pretty scummy to me, and because it was pretty obvious Bacde wasn't mafia. And this new information about him being protected from a night kill last night makes it even more unlikely that he is the Serial Killer. So yeah,

Unvote

. I don't know if Iammer's confirming whether or not he was smashed into the ground by me helps confirm my role, but I'll leave that to his discretion to reveal.

@armlx: Please explain what exactly I was doing that was summy. Don't just say you think I'm suspicous and drop it at that. I thought Bacde was scummy and I was wrong about his loyalties, what else is there against me?

Bacde · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Tue Sep 20, 2005 3:57 pm

Just to clarify, I don't know if anyone targetted me to die last night. I just know that I had protection from nightkills last night. So now I'm still as likely as before to be an SK, if thats truly what you beleive.

I'm actually tempted to beleive Chaos at the moment, but this is really based on the fact that he said his roletype was just 1 word too. It would be easy to just decide to claim roleblocker. Not to mention that scum often do get extra abilities like roleblocking. But then again, it doesn't matter what I think, I can't vote today!

Someone and Sinisteroverlord are both making me VERY nervous. Their lack of posts should not go unnoticed! If they were scum, this is exactly what they would want to happen. As much as I was convinced indentereddjinn was scum, I am less so on Chaos. I'd much rather hear the opinions of our less-than frequent posters before a lynch.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Tue Sep 20, 2005 3:59 pm

unvote

for now. Chaos, you were on the wrong side of the bandwagon Yesterday, which is why I chose to vote you, as was SinisterO. I happen to believe your claim, so

vote: SO

Iammars · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Wed Sep 21, 2005 5:01 am

What was your result?

armlx · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Wed Sep 21, 2005 9:31 am

Chaos: See what Inhim said. He summed it up well.

I also didnt intend to put you at lynch - 1. I can't do math well while playing mafia. I was thinking 7 to lynch, not 5.

I wont vote for SO now for this reason.

Iammars · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Wed Sep 21, 2005 9:42 am

My post obviously directed at Chaos.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:00 pm

I'd rather lynch the one not here at the moment.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:09 pm

Whoa. Not what I meant. Let's lynch the one that hasn't claimed yet.

Chaos · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:33 pm

Iammars wrote:My post obviously directed at Chaos.

Believe it or not, I have no idea. I even asked the mod during Day 1 if I would learn what my results were during night.

I did not / do not. I have no idea if you have a night ability or not. Seems kinda like a cop-out for me.

You can donfirm that you got smashed into the ground last night, right?

Chaos · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:35 pm

Chaos wrote:You can
c
onfirm that you got smashed into the ground last night, right?

Err.. This sounds like I'm asking you if you have a night action or not. To clarify, I am not. Reveal whatever you think is nessesary at your own discretion.

SinisterOverlord · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:49 pm

Erm...

Okay. So you plan to go through all the people who didn't go out of their way to express their agreement with you yesterday, and I presume force a claim out of them?

*shrug* I was voting for Bacde yesterday because he looked suspicious a while. I contemplated unvoting, based on the claim, but I'm still not entirely satisfied - I really don't like the way he's acting. Work and assignments struck, and before I could get back proper the day was over.

Also, I'm not here?

Bacde · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:51 pm

This game will pretty much grind to a halt unless we get our less frequent posters in here. This pretty much means YOU Pbug and Someone, and also SO a bit for lurking yesterday. As for Chaos, I am still just as suspicious of him as I was before. I really don't understand why he chose to block Iammars rather than someone who wasn't voting for indentureddjinn.

Wait, not to mention he still put his vote back on me at the beginning of today, and still pretty much accused me of being a likely SK. Either I'm really stupid here or something doesn't make sense. I just don't know what to think regarding Chaos.

Still awaiting responses from the lurkers...

Bacde · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:55 pm

Psh, wrote this while SO was writing too. I am personally nervous about you lurking yesterday, and I really appreciate how you are posting a lot more today.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Wed Sep 21, 2005 7:59 pm

I'm applying pressure to see posts. SO has responded in I think a protown manner.

unvote

- I too would like to hear from the less vocal ones.

Iammars · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Thu Sep 22, 2005 1:17 am

No. I didn't get smashed last night.