Marathon 8 (CYODS/jeepfest Classic+)

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:51 am

tho i guess there is the possibility that kilm did the vigging, which would mean you could be telling the truth

livingod · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:51 am

No reason?

vote pooky

ISO · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:52 am

Vote Count:

4 to lynch

PookyTheMagicalBear: 2 (livingod, Mojo)
Glork: 1 (Machiavellian-Mafia)
livingod: 1 (Battle Mage)

Day 2 will last a maximum of one hour, btw.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:52 am

no reason? wtf r u talking about?

livingod · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:52 am

I was addressing BM

Glork · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:52 am

Wait... If we can mutually protect, Pooks, we'd ensure that both scumgroups kill the same one among us in order to actually kill. But if they try to co-ordinate their tactics in-thread, we'll know what groups they are in and we can mutually vig one entire group, thus ensuring a loss for them. And if they shoot blindly and don't both target the same one of us, we'll both survive.

I'm trying to decide how we can use this to our advantage.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:53 am

i'm trying to decide if Kilm vigged last night, or if you're scum.

Battle Mage · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:53 am

im talking about this:

livingod wrote:Like i read the OP after the game starts.

unvote vote raffles

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:53 am

i'm going to reread his posts

Glork · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:54 am

Pooky, I

promise

that I am not scum. I know it doesn't hold the same weight as your guarantees, but seriously.

The whole point of my "massclaim" idea, other than to get a good laugh, was to see if I could catch a scumbag who didn't think enough to read the OP. I never expected a Doctor to

NOT READ HIS OWN ROLE PM.

I'm completely baffled.

livingod · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:54 am

BM: Raffles didnt seem to realize that we were all army docs, even after glork's claim and/or the OP.

Machiavellian-Mafia · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:55 am

mod:

are the votes in the vote count in chronological order?

livingod · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:55 am

I hope the forum doesn't get downtime during these games.

Glork · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:55 am

Alphabetical, MM.

ISO · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:56 am

mod: are the votes in the vote count in chronological order?

Vote counts are ordered by number of votes, and then alphabetically (as is standard in my games).

livingod · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:56 am

And I was wondering why i was fifth on the last wagon...

Battle Mage · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:56 am

fair enough. it helps however if you state your reasons AT THE TIME.
For instance, why are you waggonning Pooky?

livingod wrote:BM: Raffles didnt seem to realize that we were all army docs, even after glork's claim and/or the OP.

Glork · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:57 am

btw, the scumgroups are likely BattleMage/Mojo and livingod/MM.

Battle Mage · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:57 am

huh?
please explain.

Glork wrote:btw, the scumgroups are likely BattleMage/Mojo and livingod/MM.

Glork · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:57 am

Actually, no, I rescind that. I remember a particular scumchat game in which Pooky loopholed his way out of a "guarantee" based on word choice or something like that. I don't trust him enough right now.

livingod · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:58 am

And that leaves you, pooky and who else?

livingod · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:58 am

oh, nvr mnd then

Machiavellian-Mafia · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:58 am

Nobody should be trusted in this game, thus I'm not trusting anyone claiming doc.

Battle Mage · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:58 am

answer my question. why are you voting for Pooky?

livingod wrote:And that leaves you, pooky and who else?

Glork · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:59 am

Battle Mage wrote:huh?
please explain.

I'm just saying that, at this point, busing is highly unlikely, so you and livingod are not likely to be scum.

I also decided that both scums wouldn't jump on the same player right off the bat, so livingod/mojo is probably not a scumgroup.

When I made that post, I thought I trusted Pooky enough to say that he's not likely scum. (I have since changed my mind on that.)

So my conclusion was livingod/MM and battlemage/mojo.