First, Siv's back-and-forth on voting Tim is ridiculous. First he sheeps Tim to put IceGuy at L-1, then when I don't hammer he immediately puts the guy he just sheeped at L-1! Then he says he doesn't want to see-saw, but unvotes anyway! And then he goes back to Tim at L-1 but in his
next
post says "nobody quickhammer". Are you kidding me? If he didn't want anyone quickhammering Tim, he wouldn't have put him at L-1 in the first place! That second post feels like scum saying "Oh crap I better say don't hammer so when he flips town I can say 'I told you not to hammer! See? I'm town!'" Blech.Meanwhile, Cobbler comes back from his break (with an obnoxious reason -- "oh, I took a site break, but didn't bother telling anyone who might be impacted by it") with possibly the worst "catch-up" post I've ever seen. He says basically, "I'm parking my vote on Tim and everyone else is null" which I read as "I'm hoping to get my mislynch and keep all my options open for tomorrow." On top of that he says "Timeater isn't
that
much scummier than everyone else" (so he's basically null too?), but still doesn't unvote
to look for other scum, with about a week left to deadline.I can't decide which of the above is scummier. Either of you have anything to say in your defense?
