Mini 1462: Serra's Fun House (Game over)

Yates · Post Post #2325 (ISO) » Mon Aug 19, 2013 3:40 pm

In post 2323, Mr_Ree wrote:@Yates, I'm sorry man. When you suddenly turned on me, posted the qt and quoted EM, the only answer I could come up with was that you were alerting your scumbuddies in case I targetted you again.

Meh - I outsmarted myself. Also the victim of my own gambit I guess. Sometimes they work. Sometimes they blow up spectacularly in your face!

serrapaladin · Post Post #2326 (ISO) » Mon Aug 19, 2013 3:47 pm

In post 2325, Yates wrote:
In post 2323, Mr_Ree wrote:@Yates, I'm sorry man. When you suddenly turned on me, posted the qt and quoted EM, the only answer I could come up with was that you were alerting your scumbuddies in case I targetted you again.
Meh - I outsmarted myself. Also the victim of my own gambit I guess. Sometimes they work. Sometimes they blow up spectacularly in your face!

Don't ever change <3

I do still feel responsible for this because of the role naming thing.

I'm not quite sure how I want to do original roles from now on.

DoctorPepper · Post Post #2327 (ISO) » Mon Aug 19, 2013 3:49 pm

Nahh, dont feel bad. I would have no idea how to name the role..

serrapaladin · Post Post #2328 (ISO) » Mon Aug 19, 2013 3:52 pm

Well, "anonymous neighbouriser-jailkeeper" was its equivalent in more or less standard terms.

Mr_Ree · Post Post #2329 (ISO) » Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:17 pm

In post 2325, Yates wrote:
In post 2323, Mr_Ree wrote:@Yates, I'm sorry man. When you suddenly turned on me, posted the qt and quoted EM, the only answer I could come up with was that you were alerting your scumbuddies in case I targetted you again.
Meh - I outsmarted myself. Also the victim of my own gambit I guess. Sometimes they work. Sometimes they blow up spectacularly in your face!

Yeah. I guess we both fell victim to our own gambits. The way I described myself did match your EM reference. I needed people to believe the hider part of my role. The misinformation helped for most of the game. The consecutive no lynches gave scum a chance to stop and think and try killing me.

We would have had the best luck by breaking the game with my plan, going outside the pairs. Other than that, the big turning point in favor of scum was the no lynches.

Mr_Ree · Post Post #2330 (ISO) » Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:24 pm

In post 2328, serrapaladin wrote:Well, "anonymous neighbouriser-jailkeeper" was its equivalent in more or less standard terms.

It was a great role. I just wish the anonymous part lasted slightly longer.

Give it to me again next time. Feel free to make the following changes:
1. Lie detector
2. Hider like untargettability
3. 1 shot vig option

Seriously, why did nobody else call me out on this...?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #2331 (ISO) » Mon Aug 19, 2013 5:32 pm

See, I thought about it, and I was like "There's no way that role is even remotely correct. That's just too OP and would rely on the town's disbelief of the role. If town believed it, and it was true, then there is literally no killing it." I just...couldn't make myself believe that you were lying. lol

RachMarie · Post Post #2332 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 6:05 am

Wow they really wanted me dead I guess I am special

lol

Why me over shos?

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #2333 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 6:06 am

In post 2332, RachMarie wrote:Wow they really wanted me dead I guess I am special lol

Why me over shos?

you are very intimidating

RachMarie · Post Post #2334 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 6:07 am

LMAO yeah sure I am

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #2335 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 6:30 am

I will say this is like twice I have seen shos in a game, and he is pretty good. Not a knock at you by any means but if I had to choose between the 2, i'd have killed shos. I feel like if I was scum I could manipulate you better than I could shos.

shos · Post Post #2336 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 6:44 am

"better"? you will NEVER MANIPULATE ME MWAHAHAHA (...says after having been manipulated by fuzzy)

RachMarie · Post Post #2337 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 6:46 am

LOL ..... I was gonna say

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #2338 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 7:04 am

No I think i could manipulate rach lol

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #2339 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 7:05 am

In post 2336, shos wrote:"better"? you will NEVER MANIPULATE ME MWAHAHAHA (...says after having been manipulated by fuzzy)

But yeah you did get f'd by fuzzy lol

Mr_Ree · Post Post #2340 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:04 am

That is why I picked Rach first....

Usually it's Yates or I that manipulate the game... we got played... hard...

Moreso by Nacho and Doc P though. Did. Not. See. That. Coming.

Mr_Ree · Post Post #2341 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:17 am

I tried nominating you guys twice now...

I got an error each time. The site does not want you to have this...

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #2342 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:38 am

Nacho and Doc were the allstars of the scum team, tbf. Couldn't have done it without them.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #2343 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:39 am

As soon as DP voted, I literally sat there and refreshed the screen, hoping nacho would come in and hammer.
and then I started thinking "Oh god, what if there's a vig" lololol

Yates · Post Post #2344 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:49 am

In post 2326, serrapaladin wrote:Don't ever change <3

I do still feel responsible for this because of the role naming thing.

I'm not quite sure how I want to do original roles from now on.

I pull these gambits for the amusement of my mods and myself. Otherwise, VT just blows and what's the point?

StubbsKVM · Post Post #2345 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 9:09 am

I look forward to playing with Yates again, It felt like we were a 2 man town block on day 1 lol...

Yates · Post Post #2346 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:47 am

Agreed!

DoctorPepper · Post Post #2347 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:09 pm

Its alright Ree, I dont think we deserve it after getting 2 no kills

)

Anyway, I probably will nom you later for most memorable moment for claiming an incredibly unbalanced role that didnt die until mylo!

DoctorPepper · Post Post #2348 (ISO) » Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:46 pm

Wait, they dont have a best role claim category anymore :/

Damn, most memorable is for humorous stuff.

Mr_Ree · Post Post #2349 (ISO) » Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:25 am

Lol. Don't worry about it. I don't deserve it much either (for this game.)