SMBM II: Defense of Yoshi's Island (Final! MVPs announced!)

[hiplop]

VIFAM is never a bad vote, I dont think hes capable of getting a town PM

[DemonHybrid]

I feel that there can't be two townies who ask the same exact anti-town question in a row. We can PoE through them if need be, but there's so much scum motivation between the two of them that I feel one of them need to die.

[Vifam]

I feel that there can't be two townies who ask the same exact anti-town question in a row. We can PoE through them if need be, but there's so much scum motivation between the two of them that I feel one of them need to die.

Asking a player about a scumread is "Anti Town"?

[Isa]

So much scum motivation I can't even see it
UNVOTE:
VOTE: DemonHybrid

[Xeras]

I feel that there can't be two townies who ask the same exact anti-town question in a row. We can PoE through them if need be, but there's so much scum motivation between the two of them that I feel one of them need to die.

So... asking someone about their opinion in reads is scummy....

No.

Unvote, Vote DemonHybrid

[Bowser]

The "Surf's Up" votecount of Day 1

Ranmaru [L-12]
hiplop [L-12]
chkflip [L-12]
Kcdapot [L-12]
Vifam [L-12]
David Xanatos [L-11] projectmatt
TheJakalope [L-12]
manho [L-12]
Parabollocks [L-12]
projectmatt [L-11] Vifam
Riceballtail [L-12]
WeyounsLastClone [L-11] hiplop
Sunset [L-11] chkflip
Wrathchild [L-11] Hoppster
Xeras [L-11] DemonHybrid
Bunnylover [L-11] WLC
diddin [L-12]
Isa [L-12]
stormer [L-12]
DemonHybrid [L-10] Isa, Xeras
Celebloki [L-12]
Hoppster [L-12]

With 22 still kicking, it takes 12 to lynch, and 6 to lynch at deadline.

Deadline is

(expired on 2011-09-08 13:00:00)

or

September 8th, 2011 @ 12:00pm CDT

[projectmatt]

I feel that there can't be two townies who ask the same exact anti-town question in a row. We can PoE through them if need be, but there's so much scum motivation between the two of them that I feel one of them need to die.

Why are you setting us up for two specific lynches?

Asking somebody to explain their read isn't any kind of tell at all. Don't be that person.

[Hoppster]

VOTE: WLC HOPPSTER TOWNCRED IS WORTH EVERYTHING.

>> Hoppster: SHEEP ME FOR TOWN-CRED <votes: Wrathchild>
>> Hiplop: OKAY HOPPSTER <vote:WLC>

wat

one moar chance for town-cred hiplop

don't blow it


UNVOTE:
VOTE: Isa

So much scum motivation I can't even see it
UNVOTE:
VOTE: DemonHybrid

This looks like a vote that is deliberately vague so that it could equally be defended in retrospect as either a serious vote or a non-serious vote.


DH's derp is null, I think. But if he's scum projectmatt is town (assuming non-multi-scum).

[Vifam]

I feel that there can't be two townies who ask the same exact anti-town question in a row. We can PoE through them if need be, but there's so much scum motivation between the two of them that I feel one of them need to die.

Why are you setting us up for two specific lynches?

Asking somebody to explain their read isn't any kind of tell at all. Don't be that person.

Why is David scum?


At least bother to answer the question that started DH's derp vote on Xeras.

[hiplop]

I THINK WRAITHCHILDS MIDDLE NAME IS LAWRENCE, HENCE MY VOTE ON WLC

VOTE: ISA

[Vifam]

"C'mon DH they're just asking me to explain myself don't be on their case about it"



-----Forget to explain.

[projectmatt]

I feel that there can't be two townies who ask the same exact anti-town question in a row. We can PoE through them if need be, but there's so much scum motivation between the two of them that I feel one of them need to die.

Why are you setting us up for two specific lynches?

Asking somebody to explain their read isn't any kind of tell at all. Don't be that person.

Why is David scum?


At least bother to answer the question that started DH's derp vote on Xeras.

Why do you think I'm calling David scum?

[Vifam]

Don't pull that mess.


Why is David scum?

[projectmatt]

Good enough.

Unvote

Did you honestly expect me to have a solid scum read on page one? The purpose was to get out of RVS conversation going.

[DemonHybrid]

I feel that there can't be two townies who ask the same exact anti-town question in a row. We can PoE through them if need be, but there's so much scum motivation between the two of them that I feel one of them need to die.

Asking a player about a scumread is "Anti Town"?

So much scum motivation I can't even see it
UNVOTE:
VOTE: DemonHybrid

I feel that there can't be two townies who ask the same exact anti-town question in a row. We can PoE through them if need be, but there's so much scum motivation between the two of them that I feel one of them need to die.

So... asking someone about their opinion in reads is scummy....

No.

Unvote, Vote DemonHybrid

I'm saying that the fact that this happened:

Why is David scum?

Followed by this:

Why is David Scum?

within the span of 5 minutes is fucking weird, and that I don't think that the BOTH of them could be town.

[DemonHybrid]

Had JUST Vifam or JUST Xeras asked why David is scum, I wouldn't have said anything, but I guess missing the point is the cool thing to do nowadays, especially when I clearly stated why I thought it was weird in #26.

Xeras' vote pushes him into a bit more townish territory.

Unvote, Vote: Vifam

[Vifam]

Good enough.

Unvote

Did you honestly expect me to have a solid scum read on page one? The purpose was to get out of RVS conversation going.

No, I had the same goal as you. I didn't take you literally but it was a good topic to push on. BUT:



What prompted you to unvote David when he hasn't really done anything yet?

[Vifam]

Oh wait, I understand.


UNVOTE:

[Hoppster]

fucking weird

There's a rather huge difference between 'anti-town' and 'fucking weird'.

Which is it?


Also, more people should vote Isa.

[projectmatt]

No.

I'm saying that the fact that this happened:

Followed by this:

within the span of 5 minutes is fucking weird, and that I don't think that the BOTH of them could be town.

..Why? If a player says that "we should quicklynch player x, he's mafia!", the expected response to such a question is why? Both town and scum would be curious as to why somebody said this. Explain the scum motivation.

[DemonHybrid]

Unvote

It's time to quicklynch David Xantos. He is scum.

Vote: David Xantos

This vote doesn't need interrogation. It's very obviously pressure and asking a "why" behind it shows a

little bit

of "Let me try to see if I can undermine this vote". There is plenty of "I really want to know why the vote is there", which could be newbie logic (not getting the pressure behind the vote), but there is that little bit of scum motivation.

It IS anti-town, but one person doing it is fine. Two people doing in a row is weird and shows blatant off motivation.

[DemonHybrid]

Vifam, did you read Xeras' reply to projectmatt before you asked that question?

[Vifam]

Unvote

It's time to quicklynch David Xantos. He is scum.

Vote: David Xantos

This vote doesn't need interrogation. It's very obviously pressure and asking a "why" behind it shows a

little bit

of "Let me try to see if I can undermine this vote". There is plenty of "I really want to know why the vote is there", which could be newbie logic (not getting the pressure behind the vote), but there is that little bit of scum motivation.

It IS anti-town, but one person doing it is fine. Two people doing in a row is weird and shows blatant off motivation.

Uhm, we are in the RVS stage, the whole point is to get out and start discussion, and I think asking about a scumread on page 1 is a good way to start discussion.

[Isa]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Isa

So much scum motivation I can't even see it
UNVOTE:
VOTE: DemonHybrid

This looks like a vote that is deliberately vague so that it could equally be defended in retrospect as either a serious vote or a non-serious vote.

Can't it be...BOTH!? The grey area between an RVS vote and not an RVS vote...how I adore thee.

Disagreeing with DemonHybrid's answer to our votes.

HIPLOP
Y U NO TOWN CRED!?

[DemonHybrid]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Isa

So much scum motivation I can't even see it
UNVOTE:
VOTE: DemonHybrid

This looks like a vote that is deliberately vague so that it could equally be defended in retrospect as either a serious vote or a non-serious vote.

Can't it be...BOTH!? The grey area between an RVS vote and not an RVS vote...how I adore thee.

Disagreeing with DemonHybrid's answer to our votes.

HIPLOP
Y U NO TOWN CRED!?

You can disagree. That's just how I feel. My vote's on Vifam until he can prove to me that there is no scum motivation behind asking that question 5 minutes after Xeras did, and even asking the question in the first place.