The colored clause clearly demonstrates that he uses the word confirmed much more loosely than you do. You know that, you just want to rage over semantics and argue past dana. You like to yell things.LynchMePls wrote:But pops, this is ignoring the full chain of questioning. My original question was "Why are you calling yourself confirmed town". His response had 2 arguments, BOTH OF WHICH I SHOWED DO NOT MAKE HIM CONFIRMED TOWN. But nowhere did he admit that those pieces of evidence do NOT make him CONFIRMED town.popsofctown wrote:LynchMePls wrote:This is flatly false. Any claimed name could be VT.danakillsu wrote:If I was given a fakeclaim that WASN'T VT, then it wouldn't make much sense AS A VT. Therefore, the fact that my claim makes sense as a VT should tell you that my fakeclaim would have had to be VT from the start to make me scum.This makes me less likely scum,though admittedly not a ton less likely.You are stretching and you are refusing to acknowledge that even if your point were true(which it isn't),IT DOESN'T MAKE YOU CONFIRMED TOWN.hat
This argument is stupid, and I'm tired of it. The simple fact is dana was blatantly exaggerating by calling himself "confirmed", which is hugely anti-town at best. When people use the word "confirmed", it better damn well be fucking confirmed. I don't keep a spread sheet of all the claims, so when he called himself "confirmed" I spent about a half hour or so looking back in the record trying to figure out what the fuck he was talking about, when I couldn't figure out why he was confirmed I asked him to explain it, and it turned out to be BS.
I do not like the LL lynch. Zoraster's flip confirms LL's name, and Clegane being a SK against Lannister town doesn't seem right.
The colored text describes the chance of dana being town as if it's somewhere between 0% and 100%. That's not claiming to be guaranteed town.