That is my question too. We don't have a voting/execution mechanic to work with, all we have is the trusts.
I could assume that everyone who's been trusted (Black, Drew, Klick) is either town or scum with whoever trusted them, which actually might clear Drew due to a line of logic that my brain is not yet awake enough to verify or explain coherently (update on that later). I don't know if I like that assumption though.
Black is basically confirmed and Klick reads town to me anyway though.
this is kind of what i'm thinking! i think klick is probably town based on how they didn't just, yknow, get out with me. i'm not too sure on drew, though, i dont think he's posted once since klick trusted him
We all agree that Black is the towniest, why don't we ask her to choose two folks to trust fall. She can still be wrong but we know that she won't be actively working against us
In post 0, Klick wrote:
But with creative thinking, we can work around those steep odds. If the town can settle on one strong consensus townread, that person can decide upon an elimination target, and everyone can agree before the target is decided that they will sheep the consensus townread, regardless of their own reads on the situation. All of a sudden, instead of 5 out of 6 town players having to unite against a wolf while avoiding getting sidetracked by scum, just one player needs to get a good read. The odds are much better for town than playing out that vote normally.
That is my question too. We don't have a voting/execution mechanic to work with, all we have is the trusts.
I could assume that everyone who's been trusted (Black, Drew, Klick) is either town or scum with whoever trusted them, which actually might clear Drew due to a line of logic that my brain is not yet awake enough to verify or explain coherently (update on that later). I don't know if I like that assumption though.
Black is basically confirmed and Klick reads town to me anyway though.
this is kind of what i'm thinking! i think klick is probably town based on how they didn't just, yknow, get out with me. i'm not too sure on drew, though, i dont think he's posted once since klick trusted him
He posted an entire readslist after Klick trusted him lol.
But my "read" there is more of a mech-read than a read-read. I'll explain what I mean later.
I townread Alianna.
Post #1000s Collected: 25
On hiatus from playing mafia.
That is my question too. We don't have a voting/execution mechanic to work with, all we have is the trusts.
I could assume that everyone who's been trusted (Black, Drew, Klick) is either town or scum with whoever trusted them, which actually might clear Drew due to a line of logic that my brain is not yet awake enough to verify or explain coherently (update on that later). I don't know if I like that assumption though.
Black is basically confirmed and Klick reads town to me anyway though.
this is kind of what i'm thinking! i think klick is probably town based on how they didn't just, yknow, get out with me. i'm not too sure on drew, though, i dont think he's posted once since klick trusted him
He posted an entire readslist after Klick trusted him lol.
But my "read" there is more of a mech-read than a read-read. I'll explain what I mean later.
In post 0, Klick wrote:
But with creative thinking, we can work around those steep odds. If the town can settle on one strong consensus townread, that person can decide upon an elimination target, and everyone can agree before the target is decided that they will sheep the consensus townread, regardless of their own reads on the situation. All of a sudden, instead of 5 out of 6 town players having to unite against a wolf while avoiding getting sidetracked by scum, just one player needs to get a good read. The odds are much better for town than playing out that vote normally.
We all agree that Black is the towniest, why don't we ask her to choose two folks to trust fall. She can still be wrong but we know that she won't be actively working against us
I don't mind this idea.
I townread Alianna.
Post #1000s Collected: 25
On hiatus from playing mafia.
We all agree that Black is the towniest, why don't we ask her to choose two folks to trust fall. She can still be wrong but we know that she won't be actively working against us
I don't mind this idea.
Oooh, this might actually break the game as well(in towns favor). The two people then chosen should trust fall as soon as they can as well, if we go down this route.
'dREW DID IT BETTER' - T-Bone
'doctor drew our hero' - Shiki
'I love playing with him, he's got an amazing presence to him that just feels like the game is lacking something when he's not there' - JacksonVirgo
I think Black/Drew/myself are just town. I think arguments to the contrary aren't that strong - there are 'what-if's there but they aren't super relevant.
I think Black, Drew and myself should solidify our reads and pick one person each outside of that group that we're confident exiting with. If we all do this successfully, we win.
If it turns out one of us is scum, we can reevaluate considering that if we have to cross that bridge. I don't think that's the world we're in though.
I'm also fine with just delegating to Black if people are more comfy with that. I do think we benefit specifically from Black/Drew/myself not pairing with each other though.
Just a heads up I won't be around much this weekend. I would accept the mayor position if everyone agreed
Right now I'm feeling like mala, Merlyn, and patch might be the riskiest options to pair with people. Nothing much here other than their eagerness to trust fall. I could easily be wrong about them
Alianna is pinging me too for some reason and I can't really explain it. Maybe LAMIST? Less so than the three above
I'm most confident in skygazer and Drew atm but the confidence isn't very high here. That's typical me though. Ghandi feels ok I think
Klick feels ok but I'm always wary here so I think we wait it out. His eagerness to get people out of the game could be a bad sign but not necessarily one
I want to say though Black that you shouldn't confuse a personal preference with a scum/town tell. I hope I can explain what I mean by this. I mean is that you've stated that you want to stay in the game, so it seems you're thinking that others who think like you are presumably towny. But that doesn't mean that your preference is the 'town' way to play- the two don't actually correlate. That I don't want to play this game endlessly till late October is a personal preference of mine, I think it will be fun to trust fall and I'm playing a game in order to have fun.
Also, I'm not sure it even makes sense to say that Mala is eager to trust fall when she's stated she won't be accepting any offers or making others while you're still around. That seems to me to be the opposite of eager to leave the game.
In post 295, Black wrote:
Just a heads up I won't be around much this weekend. I would accept the mayor position if everyone agreed
Right now I'm feeling like mala, Merlyn, and patch might be the riskiest options to pair with people. Nothing much here other than their eagerness to trust fall. I could easily be wrong about them
Alianna is pinging me too for some reason and I can't really explain it. Maybe LAMIST? Less so than the three above
I'm most confident in skygazer and Drew atm but the confidence isn't very high here. That's typical me though. Ghandi feels ok I think
Klick feels ok but I'm always wary here so I think we wait it out. His eagerness to get people out of the game could be a bad sign but not necessarily one
Random Nurse we wait for
Did I miss anyone?
I feel fairly confident that Merlyn is town and I don't feel so strongly about Skygazer atm
I think Mala is pretty likely town
I also have Alianna on my radar as decently likely scum
I don't have a strong read on patchwork
