In post 299, Om of the Nom wrote:In post 296, Voidedmafia wrote:Also, I find what you're doing scummy regardless of my townread on Whisky, so...that's false, too.
NOTICE HOW THIS CAME AFTER THE FACT
...No it isn't?
In post 299, Om of the Nom wrote:In post 296, Voidedmafia wrote:Also, I find what you're doing scummy regardless of my townread on Whisky, so...that's false, too.
NOTICE HOW THIS CAME AFTER THE FACT
All his posts had been fluff and no content at all. I cbf to check exactly when I said that, but at the time he may have already passed all that off as a reaction test (or just some of it) and I didn't like that either.[/quote]In post 298, Om of the Nom wrote:
Disagree because I have a townread on Whisky, but I'm not entirely sure why you think Whisky is scum here. What posts gave you this read?
Because Whisky wasn't posting anywhere near as much fluff anymore, I've explained I think they're fluff, I still think they're fluff, that's all there is to it.
Hmmm, take a look at EVERY POST TODAY. Maybe you might find that I'm hugely undecided on which of you is the lesser evil.
Mainly doesn't mean completely, I still had some bad gut vibes from him, and I actually ended up using reason to show why he's scum. You've barely given reason until I prodded you today.
It would have told me who was scum but then I reread both of you and him together and realised how fucking inconclusive it was.
Though tbh that was just a bit of padding to make it sound like he was the better shot since frankly I knew he was going to flip scum anyway (totes not a scumslip).
Beforehand I thought he was probably bussing, but then I literally had no idea whatsoever.
1.)Not really, since I don't actually have any absolutes and 2.)there aren't really any scumteam guesses just some connections to Sala. 3.)Also how I provide both sides of the argument to show my thought process.
They were so that I could try and deduce the buddy based on both your posts and Whisky cross-referenced with Sala, I just needed to keep track of the quotes I used.
You seriously haven't read anything I've posted today have you? There is a goldmine of content and actually wanting to fucking win the game.
Om of the Nom wrote:I asked you to make a case on me earlier and you refused to do so because Whisky is town ergo I'm scum.
Now you actually say that I'm actually scummy individually from Whisker's supposed towniness.
In post 308, Om of the Nom wrote:Voided your play was pretty damn bad
just saying
PEDIT: You're already dead
In post 306, Voidedmafia wrote:P_EDIT: GOD FUCKING DAMMIt, YOU TWO, STOP FUCKING DOING THIS!
In post 307, Voidedmafia wrote:CAN I PLEASE GET THROUGH POSTING AT LEAST ONCE, FOR CRYING OUT LOUD?!
In post 69, Om of the Nom wrote:Whisky is definitely scum, and if he isn't he's probably good enough to make the right shot.
Can we just lynch Whisky?
In post 314, Om of the Nom wrote:In post 69, Om of the Nom wrote:Whisky is definitely scum, and if he isn't he's probably good enough to make the right shot.
Can we just lynch Whisky?
This should have happened goddamnit people should listen to me more
In post 316, Om of the Nom wrote:Not really, most of his posts were fluff and not adding anything to the discussion or just mindless somewhat game-related quips.
You were fucking blind to the fact that I actually cared about winning and my emotions were real. Your townread clouded your judgement heavily and it severely affected your play which is why I lynched you.
In post 318, Om of the Nom wrote:You were way too focused on proving why Whisky was town than why I was scum, just like how Sala was too focused on proving his credibility over proving I'm scum.
In post 320, Om of the Nom wrote:LYLO is a time when you need to reevaluate your reads, especially with only 2 other people there, and depending on the game you could probably be there because your reads are wrong, giving you more incentive to reevaluate them anyway. You chose to stick by a previous townread that you never even explained instead of taking the time to actually reread both of us and compare them.
In post 323, Om of the Nom wrote:I figured you'd be able to tell the difference between real anger and fake anger in regards to me by now
It was bad in this case since you were almost doing it just to show me why I'm wrong, which is stupid since you thought I was scum anyway therefore it would have been useless to convince me. As town it's half the battle to prove to the other townies why you're right and person A is scum, not prove to the scum why they're scum.
Explaining it to yourself does jack shit if you want to be heard.