Some examples.
This says that Slepz is a lurker and therefore scum. The request to Gwyn is reasonable, but the proposition made to fitz is not. Its scummy.Nikanor wrote:Three more votes on Slepzlurkerscum.
Gwynplaine, would you be opposed to changing your vote over to Slepz today?
fitz, how about this: I'll answer your question when you vote Slepz. Sound fair?
Slepz must die, simply because he is a lurker?Nikanor wrote:Slepz is lurking. So he needs to die. End of story.
Vote Slepz for Mafioso 2010.
Even when a possible explanation is put forward for Slepz lack of post... he has to die because he's a lurker. And lets not forget the bargain he tried to make with JS. Pushing as hard and insistently as this for a lynch makes sense when you have a genuinely good case for their lynch. Nikanor, unless he cares to explain in retrospect, has no such case, just a burning desire to lynch Slepz. Its very scummy.Nikanor wrote:...The man with the buttons wrote:You are aware he's V/LA right?
No, I actually wasn't.
DIE SLEPZ DIE ANYWAY. The May long weekend ended on Monday. Why aren't you back yet?
I'm still suspicious of TBM for exactly the same reasons I spent a large portion of yesterday voting for him. I can very easily see Nik and TBM as scum together based on how easily Nikanor "reads" TBM as town based only on 2 iso posts, ignoring the scumminess that come thereafter. I am fairly confident in a Nik/TBM as scumbuddies.
Since one page is much much too early in the day for L-1 on TBM today.