In post 100, kondi2424 wrote:But he voted you for pressure. I smell some OMGUS up in here. You then go on to call him scummy because he didn't unvote you when you answered your question, but he had a new reason to vote you; he thought your strategy was scummy. By the way, you did the same thing. Your new reason to vote him was because he didn't change his vote.
VOTE: Delta
This is where you vote Delta. This was fine for the time of day; Delta's vote was pretty clear OMGUS.
I did look again, just now, and no, it was basically OMGUS. Which was fine when you did it, but by this time nearly one hundred posts had gone by and you hadn't offered any opinion on the wagon, anyone other than Delta, etc.
You say this sarcastically, but you sure didn't give any reads yesterday.
In post 312, kondi2424 wrote:I'll post my reads tomorrow. My reads completely suck on Day 1, as I'm best at viewing reactions with flipped players.
This is such crap. Lots of people's reads suck on Day One. In fact, I'd say most people's reads suck on Day One, and I'd definitely include my own. The reason for giving reads on Day One is not because you're going to peg all the scum in your D1 reads. It's so, once we get more flips and information, we can go back and look at those reads for evidence of buddying, distancing, etc. The fact that you didn't want to give them after you were asked is pretty telling to me.
So what's crap about your Delta vote was not so much the vote itself, which was valid when you made it, but the fact that you ignored nearly 200 posts that came after and avoided giving any opinion on any player other than "Delta is scummy 'cause OMGUS."
FoS: Kondi
If I had two votes, I'd vote for both Kondi and Empking, but unfortunately I can only vote one at a time!
Thank you for the heads-up, though!
