Mike Amok wrote:Here's a reason: I'm Super Duper Kalifragilistic Ultra Innocent.
*blinks several times* wow. Convinced me.
mathcam wrote:Well, I apologize for the triple post, especially when the first two were so long, but
Note to Porro: Gaspode is on the dead list and the alive list on page 1.
Is everything else there correct?
Cam
MeMe wrote:I mean, why on earth would cp think he would need protection? His two targets (gaspode & diplomat) were pro-town, so there's certainly no reason for mafia to want him dead -- even if he's innocent, he's been their good little helper.
Oops. Sorry, I forgot that we didn't yet know the roles when you submitted your plea. No reason to get nasty, though, and to call me illogical. I mean, be objective, cp. Ascasinopete referring to my post wrote:This is so far beyond illogical I didn’t think I really needed to answer it. I’d asked for the protection before either of their roles had been revealed, when they both still very much looked like scum. And, at the time, I had been the only one using logic of any sort in my accusations.
Well, I didn't have a "problem" with them -- I always love it when people talk. But, if you'll notice, I never followed your recommendations. Just because I didn't "complain" doesn't mean that you should infer that I was special-ordering a banner reading "Paragon of Sense" with which to festoon you. Yeah, you were literate, but you were still wrong. See? Logic ain't everything, apparently.casinopete wrote:How can you cast doubt on my methods like this, MeMe, when you seemed to have absolutely no problem with my accusations before?
casinopete wrote: Please, speak up. The more people talking, the more fun this game is.
I'm still more suspicious of you than Blicero, though, so I'll leave my vote until someone (possibly, Mike, yourself) provides me a better target.
Did you mean Blicero, or DS?